Home / Security / CVE index / 2024
2024 NetApp CVEs
Showing 300 CVEs with a 2024 identifier — page 1 of 3. Sorted by CVE id.
Always verify. NetApp's advisory is authoritative for affected versions and fixes; NVD carries the CVSS record.
Showing 300 of 300
| CVE | Published | Severity | CVSS | Summary / Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2024-0057 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240208-0007 |
CVE-2024-0232 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240315-0007 |
CVE-2024-0397 | 2024-06-17 | HIGH | 7.4 | A defect was discovered in the Python “ssl” module where there is a memory race condition with the ssl.SSLContext methods “cert_store_stats()” and “get_ca_certs NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250411-0006 |
CVE-2024-0408 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240307-0006 |
CVE-2024-0409 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240307-0006 |
CVE-2024-0450 | 2024-03-19 | MEDIUM | 6.2 | An issue was found in the CPython `zipfile` module affecting versions 3.12.1, 3.11.7, 3.10.13, 3.9.18, and 3.8.18 and prior. The zipfile module is vulnerable to NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250411-0005 |
CVE-2024-0553 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240202-0011 |
CVE-2024-0565 | 2024-01-15 | MEDIUM | 6.8 | An out-of-bounds memory read flaw was found in receive_encrypted_standard in fs/smb/client/smb2ops.c in the SMB Client sub-component in the Linux Kernel. This i NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240223-0002 |
CVE-2024-0567 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240202-0011 |
CVE-2024-0684 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240808-0001 |
CVE-2024-0690 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250117-0001 |
CVE-2024-0727 | 2024-01-26 | MEDIUM | 5.5 | Issue summary: Processing a maliciously formatted PKCS12 file may lead OpenSSL to crash leading to a potential Denial of Service attack Impact summary: Applicat NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240208-0006 |
CVE-2024-0760 | 2024-07-23 | HIGH | 7.5 | A malicious client can send many DNS messages over TCP, potentially causing the server to become unstable while the attack is in progress. The server may recove NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240731-0004 |
CVE-2024-0831 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240223-0005 |
CVE-2024-0853 | 2024-02-03 | MEDIUM | 5.3 | curl inadvertently kept the SSL session ID for connections in its cache even when the verify status (*OCSP stapling*) test failed. A subsequent transfer to the NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240503-0012 · NTAP-20240426-0009 +1 |
CVE-2024-0985 | 2024-02-08 | HIGH | 8.0 | Late privilege drop in REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY in PostgreSQL allows an object creator to execute arbitrary SQL functions as the command issuer. T NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241220-0005 |
CVE-2024-10005 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250110-0004 |
CVE-2024-10006 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250110-0005 |
CVE-2024-10086 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250110-0006 |
CVE-2024-1048 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240223-0007 |
CVE-2024-10524 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250321-0007 |
CVE-2024-10846 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250425-0008 |
CVE-2024-1086 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240614-0009 |
CVE-2024-10921 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250627-0006 |
CVE-2024-10976 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250509-0010 |
CVE-2024-10977 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251107-0002 |
CVE-2024-10978 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250822-0003 |
CVE-2024-10979 | 2024-11-14 | HIGH | 8.8 | Incorrect control of environment variables in PostgreSQL PL/Perl allows an unprivileged database user to change sensitive process environment variables (e.g. PA NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250110-0003 |
CVE-2024-11053 | 2024-12-11 | LOW | 3.4 | When asked to both use a `.netrc` file for credentials and to follow HTTP redirects, curl could leak the password used for the first host to the followed-to hos NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250131-0003 · NTAP-20250131-0004 +1 |
CVE-2024-11168 | 2024-11-12 | LOW | 3.7 | The urllib.parse.urlsplit() and urlparse() functions improperly validated bracketed hosts (`[]`), allowing hosts that weren't IPv6 or IPvFuture. This behavior w NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250411-0004 |
CVE-2024-11187 | 2025-01-29 | HIGH | 7.5 | It is possible to construct a zone such that some queries to it will generate responses containing numerous records in the Additional section. An attacker sendi NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250207-0002 |
CVE-2024-11233 | 2024-11-24 | MEDIUM | 4.8 | In PHP versions 8.1.* before 8.1.31, 8.2.* before 8.2.26, 8.3.* before 8.3.14, due to an error in convert.quoted-printable-decode filter certain data can lead t NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241220-0008 |
CVE-2024-11234 | 2024-11-24 | MEDIUM | 4.8 | In PHP versions 8.1.* before 8.1.31, 8.2.* before 8.2.26, 8.3.* before 8.3.14, when using streams with configured proxy and "request_fulluri" option, the URI is NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241220-0008 |
CVE-2024-11236 | 2024-11-24 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | In PHP versions 8.1.* before 8.1.31, 8.2.* before 8.2.26, 8.3.* before 8.3.14, uncontrolled long string inputs to ldap_escape() function on 32-bit systems can c NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241220-0008 |
CVE-2024-11477 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250214-0007 |
CVE-2024-11612 | 2024-11-22 | MEDIUM | 6.5 | 7-Zip CopyCoder Infinite Loop Denial-of-Service Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to create a denial-of-service condition on affected in NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251010-0001 |
CVE-2024-11741 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250509-0006 |
CVE-2024-12084 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250131-0002 |
CVE-2024-12085 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250131-0002 |
CVE-2024-12086 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250131-0002 |
CVE-2024-12087 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250131-0002 |
CVE-2024-12088 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250131-0002 |
CVE-2024-12133 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250523-0003 |
CVE-2024-12243 | 2025-02-10 | MEDIUM | 5.3 | A flaw was found in GnuTLS, which relies on libtasn1 for ASN.1 data processing. Due to an inefficient algorithm in libtasn1, decoding certain DER-encoded certif NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250523-0002 |
CVE-2024-12254 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250404-0010 |
CVE-2024-12705 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250207-0003 |
CVE-2024-12718 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250904-0008 |
CVE-2024-12747 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250131-0002 |
CVE-2024-12797 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250214-0001 |
CVE-2024-12798 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260522-0001 · NTAP-20250704-0002 |
CVE-2024-12801 | 2024-12-19 | LOW | 2.4 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in SaxEventRecorder by QOS.CH logback version 0.1 to 1.3.14 and 1.4.0 to 1.5.12 on the Java platform, allows an attacker to f NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260522-0001 · NTAP-20250704-0001 |
CVE-2024-12905 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250801-0003 |
CVE-2024-1298 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250306-0002 |
CVE-2024-1313 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240524-0008 |
CVE-2024-13176 | 2025-01-20 | MEDIUM | 4.1 | Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow recovering the private key exists in the ECDSA signature computation. Impact summary: A timin NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250502-0006 · NTAP-20250418-0010 +1 |
CVE-2024-1351 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240524-0010 |
CVE-2024-13978 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251212-0008 |
CVE-2024-1441 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250411-0003 |
CVE-2024-1442 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241122-0007 |
CVE-2024-1459 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241122-0008 |
CVE-2024-1597 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240419-0008 |
CVE-2024-1635 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240322-0007 |
CVE-2024-1737 | 2024-07-23 | HIGH | 7.5 | Resolver caches and authoritative zone databases that hold significant numbers of RRs for the same hostname (of any RTYPE) can suffer from degraded performance NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240731-0003 |
CVE-2024-1874 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240510-0009 |
CVE-2024-1931 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240705-0006 |
CVE-2024-1975 | 2024-07-23 | HIGH | 7.5 | If a server hosts a zone containing a "KEY" Resource Record, or a resolver DNSSEC-validates a "KEY" Resource Record from a DNSSEC-signed domain in cache, a clie NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240731-0002 |
CVE-2024-2004 | 2024-03-27 | LOW | 3.5 | When a protocol selection parameter option disables all protocols without adding any then the default set of protocols would remain in the allowed set due to an NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240524-0006 |
CVE-2024-2048 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240524-0009 |
CVE-2024-20672 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250328-0006 |
CVE-2024-20918 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241108-0002 · NTAP-20240201-0002 |
CVE-2024-20919 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241108-0002 · NTAP-20240201-0002 |
CVE-2024-20921 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241108-0002 · NTAP-20240201-0002 |
CVE-2024-20922 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240201-0002 |
CVE-2024-20923 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240201-0002 |
CVE-2024-20925 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240201-0002 |
CVE-2024-20926 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241108-0002 · NTAP-20240201-0002 |
CVE-2024-20932 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240201-0002 |
CVE-2024-20945 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241108-0002 · NTAP-20240201-0002 |
CVE-2024-20952 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241108-0002 · NTAP-20240201-0002 |
CVE-2024-20960 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240201-0003 |
CVE-2024-20961 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240201-0003 |
CVE-2024-20962 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240201-0003 |
CVE-2024-20963 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240201-0003 |
CVE-2024-20964 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240201-0003 |
CVE-2024-20965 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240201-0003 · NTAP-20240201-0006 |
CVE-2024-20966 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240201-0003 |
CVE-2024-20967 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240201-0003 |
CVE-2024-20968 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240201-0008 |
CVE-2024-20969 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240201-0003 |
CVE-2024-20970 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240201-0003 |
CVE-2024-20971 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240201-0003 |
CVE-2024-20972 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240201-0003 |
CVE-2024-20973 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240201-0003 |
CVE-2024-20974 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240201-0003 |
CVE-2024-20975 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240201-0007 |
CVE-2024-20976 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240201-0003 |
CVE-2024-20977 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240201-0003 |
CVE-2024-20978 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240201-0003 |
CVE-2024-20981 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240201-0003 |
CVE-2024-20982 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240201-0003 |
CVE-2024-20983 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240201-0009 |
CVE-2024-20984 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240201-0003 |
CVE-2024-20985 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240201-0003 |
CVE-2024-20993 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240426-0014 |
CVE-2024-20994 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240426-0013 |
CVE-2024-20996 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240801-0001 |
CVE-2024-20998 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240426-0013 |
CVE-2024-21000 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240426-0013 |
CVE-2024-21002 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240426-0004 |
CVE-2024-21003 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240426-0004 |
CVE-2024-21004 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240426-0004 |
CVE-2024-21005 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240426-0004 |
CVE-2024-21008 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240426-0013 |
CVE-2024-21009 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240426-0013 |
CVE-2024-21011 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240426-0004 |
CVE-2024-21012 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240426-0004 |
CVE-2024-21013 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240426-0013 |
CVE-2024-21015 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240426-0010 |
CVE-2024-21047 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240426-0013 |
CVE-2024-21049 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240426-0012 |
CVE-2024-21050 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240426-0012 |
CVE-2024-21051 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240426-0012 |
CVE-2024-21052 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240426-0012 |
CVE-2024-21053 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240426-0012 |
CVE-2024-21054 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240426-0013 |
CVE-2024-21055 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240426-0011 |
CVE-2024-21056 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240426-0012 |
CVE-2024-21057 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240426-0011 |
CVE-2024-21060 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240426-0013 |
CVE-2024-21061 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240426-0014 |
CVE-2024-21062 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240426-0013 |
CVE-2024-21068 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240426-0004 |
CVE-2024-21069 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240426-0013 |
CVE-2024-21085 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240426-0004 |
CVE-2024-21087 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240426-0013 |
CVE-2024-21094 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240426-0004 |
CVE-2024-21096 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240426-0013 |
CVE-2024-21101 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240426-0015 |
CVE-2024-21102 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240426-0013 · NTAP-20240426-0015 |
CVE-2024-21125 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240801-0001 |
CVE-2024-21127 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240801-0001 |
CVE-2024-21129 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240801-0001 |
CVE-2024-21130 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240801-0001 |
CVE-2024-21131 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240719-0008 |
CVE-2024-21134 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240801-0001 |
CVE-2024-21135 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240801-0002 |
CVE-2024-21137 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240731-0009 |
CVE-2024-21138 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240719-0008 |
CVE-2024-21140 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240719-0008 |
CVE-2024-21142 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240801-0001 |
CVE-2024-21144 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240719-0007 |
CVE-2024-21145 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240719-0008 |
CVE-2024-21147 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240719-0008 |
CVE-2024-21157 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240731-0008 |
CVE-2024-21159 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240801-0002 |
CVE-2024-21160 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240801-0002 |
CVE-2024-21162 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240801-0001 |
CVE-2024-21163 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240801-0001 |
CVE-2024-21165 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240731-0007 |
CVE-2024-21166 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240801-0002 |
CVE-2024-21171 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240801-0001 |
CVE-2024-21173 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240801-0001 |
CVE-2024-21176 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240731-0006 |
CVE-2024-21177 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240801-0001 |
CVE-2024-21179 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240801-0001 |
CVE-2024-21185 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240731-0005 |
CVE-2024-21193 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241025-0006 |
CVE-2024-21194 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241025-0006 |
CVE-2024-21196 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241025-0006 |
CVE-2024-21197 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241025-0006 |
CVE-2024-21198 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241025-0006 |
CVE-2024-21199 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241025-0006 |
CVE-2024-21200 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241101-0007 |
CVE-2024-21201 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241025-0006 |
CVE-2024-21203 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241025-0006 |
CVE-2024-21204 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241101-0009 |
CVE-2024-21207 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241025-0007 |
CVE-2024-21208 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241018-0010 |
CVE-2024-21209 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241101-0005 |
CVE-2024-21210 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241018-0010 |
CVE-2024-21211 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241018-0008 |
CVE-2024-21212 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241025-0008 |
CVE-2024-21213 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241025-0006 |
CVE-2024-21217 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241018-0010 |
CVE-2024-21218 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241025-0006 |
CVE-2024-21219 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241025-0006 |
CVE-2024-21230 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241025-0006 |
CVE-2024-21231 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241025-0006 |
CVE-2024-21232 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241101-0008 |
CVE-2024-21235 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241018-0010 |
CVE-2024-21236 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241025-0006 |
CVE-2024-21237 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241025-0006 |
CVE-2024-21238 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241025-0009 |
CVE-2024-21239 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241025-0006 |
CVE-2024-21241 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241025-0006 |
CVE-2024-21243 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241101-0008 |
CVE-2024-21244 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241101-0008 |
CVE-2024-21247 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241101-0006 |
CVE-2024-21262 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241025-0005 |
CVE-2024-21312 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240208-0008 |
CVE-2024-21409 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250117-0002 |
CVE-2024-21490 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251107-0001 |
CVE-2024-21634 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241108-0002 |
CVE-2024-21664 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250605-0005 |
CVE-2024-21733 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240216-0005 |
CVE-2024-21781 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241011-0009 |
CVE-2024-21829 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241011-0009 |
CVE-2024-21844 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241108-0003 |
CVE-2024-21859 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250919-0014 |
CVE-2024-21871 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241011-0009 |
CVE-2024-21885 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240503-0004 |
CVE-2024-21890 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240315-0002 |
CVE-2024-21891 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240315-0005 |
CVE-2024-21892 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240322-0003 |
CVE-2024-21896 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240329-0002 |
CVE-2024-21982 | 2024-01-12 | MEDIUM | 4.8 | ONTAP versions 9.4 and higher are susceptible to a vulnerability which when successfully exploited could lead to disclosure of sensitive information to unprivil NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240111-0001 |
CVE-2024-21983 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240216-0012 |
CVE-2024-21984 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240216-0013 |
CVE-2024-21985 | 2024-01-26 | HIGH | 7.6 | ONTAP 9 versions prior to 9.9.1P18, 9.10.1P16, 9.11.1P13, 9.12.1P10 and 9.13.1P4 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow an authenticated user with NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240126-0001 |
CVE-2024-21987 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240216-0001 |
CVE-2024-21988 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240614-0010 |
CVE-2024-21989 | 2024-04-17 | HIGH | 8.1 | ONTAP Select Deploy administration utility versions 9.12.1.x, 9.13.1.x and 9.14.1.x are susceptible to a vulnerability which when successfully exploited could a NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240411-0001 |
CVE-2024-21990 | 2024-04-17 | MEDIUM | 5.4 | ONTAP Select Deploy administration utility versions 9.12.1.x, 9.13.1.x and 9.14.1.x contain hard-coded credentials that could allow an attacker to view Deploy c NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240411-0002 |
CVE-2024-21993 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240705-0007 |
CVE-2024-21994 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241108-0001 |
CVE-2024-22017 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240517-0007 |
CVE-2024-22018 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240816-0007 |
CVE-2024-22019 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240315-0004 |
CVE-2024-22020 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241122-0006 |
CVE-2024-22025 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240517-0008 |
CVE-2024-22185 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250926-0010 |
CVE-2024-22201 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240329-0001 |
CVE-2024-22207 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240216-0002 |
CVE-2024-22233 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240614-0005 |
CVE-2024-22234 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240315-0003 |
CVE-2024-22243 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240524-0001 |
CVE-2024-22257 | 2024-03-18 | HIGH | 8.2 | In Spring Security, versions 5.7.x prior to 5.7.12, 5.8.x prior to 5.8.11, versions 6.0.x prior to 6.0.9, versions 6.1.x prior to 6.1.8, versions 6.2.x prior to NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240419-0005 |
CVE-2024-22259 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240524-0002 |
CVE-2024-22262 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240524-0003 |
CVE-2024-22360 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240517-0003 |
CVE-2024-22365 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260403-0007 |
CVE-2024-2240 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250904-0001 |
CVE-2024-22667 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240223-0008 |
CVE-2024-2312 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240426-0003 |
CVE-2024-23444 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250404-0001 |
CVE-2024-23450 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240517-0010 |
CVE-2024-23454 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241101-0002 |
CVE-2024-23599 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241011-0009 |
CVE-2024-23638 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240208-0010 |
CVE-2024-23672 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240402-0002 |
CVE-2024-2379 | 2024-03-27 | MEDIUM | 6.3 | libcurl skips the certificate verification for a QUIC connection under certain conditions, when built to use wolfSSL. If told to use an unknown/bad cipher or cu NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240531-0001 |
CVE-2024-23944 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260130-0008 |
CVE-2024-2398 | 2024-03-27 | HIGH | 8.6 | When an application tells libcurl it wants to allow HTTP/2 server push, and the amount of received headers for the push surpasses the maximum allowed limit (100 NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240503-0009 |
CVE-2024-2408 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250321-0008 |
CVE-2024-24474 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240510-0012 |
CVE-2024-24549 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240402-0002 |
CVE-2024-2466 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240503-0010 |
CVE-2024-24750 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240419-0006 |
CVE-2024-24758 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240419-0007 |
CVE-2024-24783 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240329-0005 |
CVE-2024-24784 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240329-0007 |
CVE-2024-24785 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240329-0008 |
CVE-2024-24786 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240517-0002 |
CVE-2024-24787 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240531-0006 |
CVE-2024-24788 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240605-0002 |
CVE-2024-24789 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250131-0008 |
CVE-2024-24790 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240905-0002 |
CVE-2024-24791 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241004-0004 |
CVE-2024-24795 | 2024-04-04 | MEDIUM | 6.3 | HTTP Response splitting in multiple modules in Apache HTTP Server allows an attacker that can inject malicious response headers into backend applications to cau NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240415-0013 |
CVE-2024-24806 | 2024-02-07 | HIGH | 7.3 | libuv is a multi-platform support library with a focus on asynchronous I/O. The `uv_getaddrinfo` function in `src/unix/getaddrinfo.c` (and its windows counterpa NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240605-0008 |
CVE-2024-2494 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240517-0009 |
CVE-2024-2496 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250814-0005 |
CVE-2024-24985 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250919-0013 |
CVE-2024-24989 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260703-0003 |
CVE-2024-24990 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260703-0004 |
CVE-2024-25030 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240517-0006 |
CVE-2024-25041 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241108-0002 |
CVE-2024-25046 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240517-0005 |
CVE-2024-25047 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0007 |
CVE-2024-25053 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241108-0002 |
CVE-2024-25062 | 2024-02-04 | HIGH | 7.5 | An issue was discovered in libxml2 before 2.11.7 and 2.12.x before 2.12.5. When using the XML Reader interface with DTD validation and XInclude expansion enable NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260116-0019 · NTAP-20241018-0009 |
CVE-2024-2511 | 2024-04-08 | MEDIUM | 5.9 | Issue summary: Some non-default TLS server configurations can cause unbounded memory growth when processing TLSv1.3 sessions Impact summary: An attacker may exp NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240503-0013 |
CVE-2024-25111 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240605-0001 |
CVE-2024-25126 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240510-0005 |
CVE-2024-25176 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251017-0013 |
CVE-2024-25177 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251017-0013 |
CVE-2024-25178 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251017-0013 |
CVE-2024-25617 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240322-0006 |
CVE-2024-25621 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260612-0001 |
CVE-2024-25710 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240307-0010 |
CVE-2024-25744 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241115-0006 |
CVE-2024-25940 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240419-0004 |
CVE-2024-25941 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240510-0003 |
CVE-2024-26141 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240510-0007 |
CVE-2024-26142 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240503-0003 |
CVE-2024-26143 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240510-0004 |
CVE-2024-26144 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240510-0013 |
CVE-2024-26146 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240510-0006 |
CVE-2024-26306 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250228-0007 |
CVE-2024-26308 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240307-0009 |
Years: 2026 · 2025 · 2024 · 2023 · 2022 · 2021 · 2020 · 2019 · 2018 · 2017 · 2016 · 2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 1999