NetApp Black Box — ONTAP knowledge base

Home / Security / CVE index / 2022

2022 NetApp CVEs

Showing 300 CVEs with a 2022 identifier — page 1 of 3. Sorted by CVE id.

Always verify. NetApp's advisory is authoritative for affected versions and fixes; NVD carries the CVSS record.
Showing 300 of 300
CVEPublishedSeverityCVSSSummary / Sources
CVE-2022-0001——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220818-0004
CVE-2022-0002——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220818-0004
CVE-2022-0185——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220225-0003
CVE-2022-03182022-01-21CRITICAL9.8Heap-based Buffer Overflow in vim/vim prior to 8.2. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241115-0004
CVE-2022-0330——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220526-0001
CVE-2022-0336——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220201-0003
CVE-2022-0358——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221007-0008
CVE-2022-03912022-02-09HIGH7.5A flaw was found in Python, specifically within the urllib.parse module. This module helps break Uniform Resource Locator (URL) strings into components. The iss NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220225-0009
CVE-2022-0396——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220408-0001
CVE-2022-0435——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220602-0001
CVE-2022-0492——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220419-0002
CVE-2022-0500——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220519-0001
CVE-2022-0516——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220331-0009
CVE-2022-0543——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220331-0004
CVE-2022-05612022-02-11MEDIUM5.5Null source pointer passed as an argument to memcpy() function within TIFFFetchStripThing() in tif_dirread.c in libtiff versions from 3.9.0 to 4.3.0 could lead NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220318-0001
CVE-2022-05622022-02-11MEDIUM5.5Null source pointer passed as an argument to memcpy() function within TIFFReadDirectory() in tif_dirread.c in libtiff versions from 4.0 to 4.3.0 could lead to D NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220318-0001
CVE-2022-05632022-02-21MEDIUM5.5A flaw was found in the util-linux chfn and chsh utilities when compiled with Readline support. The Readline library uses an "INPUTRC" environment variable to g NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220331-0002
CVE-2022-0635——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220408-0001
CVE-2022-0646——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220318-0006
CVE-2022-0667——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220408-0001
CVE-2022-0686——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220325-0006
CVE-2022-0691——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220325-0006
CVE-2022-0742——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220425-0001
CVE-2022-07782022-03-15HIGH7.5The BN_mod_sqrt() function, which computes a modular square root, contains a bug that can cause it to loop forever for non-prime moduli. Internally this functio NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006 · NTAP-20220429-0005 +1
CVE-2022-0812——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230427-0011
CVE-2022-0847——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220325-0005
CVE-2022-0865——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221228-0008
CVE-2022-0891——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221228-0008
CVE-2022-08972022-03-25MEDIUM4.3A flaw was found in the libvirt nwfilter driver. The virNWFilterObjListNumOfNWFilters method failed to acquire the driver->nwfilters mutex before iterating over NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220519-0002
CVE-2022-09072022-03-11MEDIUM5.5Unchecked Return Value to NULL Pointer Dereference in tiffcrop in libtiff 4.3.0 allows attackers to cause a denial-of-service via a crafted tiff file. For users NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220506-0002
CVE-2022-09082022-03-11HIGH7.7Null source pointer passed as an argument to memcpy() function within TIFFFetchNormalTag () in tif_dirread.c in libtiff versions up to 4.3.0 could lead to Denia NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220506-0002
CVE-2022-09092022-03-11MEDIUM5.5Divide By Zero error in tiffcrop in libtiff 4.3.0 allows attackers to cause a denial-of-service via a crafted tiff file. For users that compile libtiff from sou NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220506-0002
CVE-2022-09242022-03-11MEDIUM5.5Out-of-bounds Read error in tiffcp in libtiff 4.3.0 allows attackers to cause a denial-of-service via a crafted tiff file. For users that compile libtiff from s NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220506-0002
CVE-2022-0995——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220429-0001
CVE-2022-0998——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220513-0003
CVE-2022-1011——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220425-0002
CVE-2022-1012——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221020-0006
CVE-2022-1048——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220629-0001
CVE-2022-1055——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220506-0007
CVE-2022-1056——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221228-0008
CVE-2022-1116——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220629-0004
CVE-2022-1158——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230214-0003
CVE-2022-1183——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220707-0002
CVE-2022-1199——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221228-0006
CVE-2022-1205——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230214-0003
CVE-2022-12102022-04-03MEDIUM4.3A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in LibTIFF 4.3.0. Affected by this vulnerability is the TIFF File Handler of tiff2ps. Opening a malicious fi NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220513-0005
CVE-2022-1227——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240628-0001
CVE-2022-1259——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221014-0006
CVE-2022-1271——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220930-0006
CVE-2022-12922022-05-03HIGH7.3The c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a mann NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0004 · NTAP-20220602-0009
CVE-2022-13042022-04-14HIGH7.8An out-of-bounds read/write vulnerability was found in e2fsprogs 1.46.5. This issue leads to a segmentation fault and possibly arbitrary code execution via a sp NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241122-0010
CVE-2022-1319——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221014-0006
CVE-2022-13432022-05-03MEDIUM5.3The function `OCSP_basic_verify` verifies the signer certificate on an OCSP response. In the case where the (non-default) flag OCSP_NOCHECKS is used then the re NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220602-0009
CVE-2022-1353——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220629-0001
CVE-2022-13542022-08-31MEDIUM5.5A heap buffer overflow flaw was found in Libtiffs' tiffinfo.c in TIFFReadRawDataStriped() function. This flaw allows an attacker to pass a crafted TIFF file to NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221014-0007
CVE-2022-13552022-08-31MEDIUM6.1A stack buffer overflow flaw was found in Libtiffs' tiffcp.c in main() function. This flaw allows an attacker to pass a crafted TIFF file to the tiffcp tool, tr NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221014-0007
CVE-2022-14342022-05-03MEDIUM5.9The OpenSSL 3.0 implementation of the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite incorrectly uses the AAD data as the MAC key. This makes the MAC key trivially predictable. An attacke NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220602-0009
CVE-2022-1471——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006 · NTAP-20230818-0015
CVE-2022-14732022-05-03HIGH7.5The OPENSSL_LH_flush() function, which empties a hash table, contains a bug that breaks reuse of the memory occuppied by the removed hash table entries. This fu NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220602-0009
CVE-2022-1552——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221104-0005
CVE-2022-15862022-05-16CRITICAL9.1An out-of-bounds read vulnerability was discovered in the PCRE2 library in the compile_xclass_matchingpath() function of the pcre2_jit_compile.c file. This invo NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0009
CVE-2022-15872022-05-16CRITICAL9.1An out-of-bounds read vulnerability was discovered in the PCRE2 library in the get_recurse_data_length() function of the pcre2_jit_compile.c file. This issue af NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0009
CVE-2022-1619——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220930-0007
CVE-2022-16222022-05-11MEDIUM5.5LibTIFF master branch has an out-of-bounds read in LZWDecode in libtiff/tif_lzw.c:619, allowing attackers to cause a denial-of-service via a crafted tiff file. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220616-0005
CVE-2022-16232022-05-11MEDIUM5.5LibTIFF master branch has an out-of-bounds read in LZWDecode in libtiff/tif_lzw.c:624, allowing attackers to cause a denial-of-service via a crafted tiff file. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220616-0005
CVE-2022-1651——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220901-0008
CVE-2022-1652——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220722-0002
CVE-2022-16642022-05-26CRITICAL9.8Dpkg::Source::Archive in dpkg, the Debian package management system, before version 1.21.8, 1.20.10, 1.19.8, 1.18.26 is prone to a directory traversal vulnerabi NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221007-0002
CVE-2022-1671——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220901-0004
CVE-2022-16782022-05-25MEDIUM5.9An issue was discovered in the Linux Kernel from 4.18 to 4.19, an improper update of sock reference in TCP pacing can lead to memory/netns leak, which can be us NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220715-0001
CVE-2022-1679——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220629-0007
CVE-2022-1729——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230214-0006
CVE-2022-1734——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220707-0007
CVE-2022-1786——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220722-0001
CVE-2022-1882——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220715-0002
CVE-2022-1941——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240705-0001
CVE-2022-1973——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230120-0001
CVE-2022-1976——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230214-0005
CVE-2022-1996——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220923-0005
CVE-2022-1998——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220707-0009
CVE-2022-2031——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0010
CVE-2022-2047——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220901-0006
CVE-2022-2048——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220901-0006
CVE-2022-2056——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220826-0001
CVE-2022-2057——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220826-0001
CVE-2022-2058——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220826-0001
CVE-2022-20682022-06-21HIGH7.3In addition to the c_rehash shell command injection identified in CVE-2022-1292, further circumstances where the c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shel NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220707-0008
CVE-2022-20824——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220923-0001
CVE-2022-20972022-07-05MEDIUM5.3AES OCB mode for 32-bit x86 platforms using the AES-NI assembly optimised implementation will not encrypt the entirety of the data under some circumstances. Thi NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006 · NTAP-20230420-0008 +1
CVE-2022-21123——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220624-0008
CVE-2022-21125——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220624-0008
CVE-2022-21127——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220624-0008
CVE-2022-21151——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220826-0003
CVE-2022-21166——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220624-0008
CVE-2022-21180——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220624-0006
CVE-2022-21198——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221111-0006
CVE-2022-21216——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230601-0005
CVE-2022-21233——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220923-0002
CVE-2022-21245——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21248——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0007
CVE-2022-21249——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21253——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21254——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21256——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21264——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21265——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-2127——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230731-0010
CVE-2022-21270——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21271——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0007
CVE-2022-21277——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0007
CVE-2022-21278——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21279——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21280——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21282——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0007
CVE-2022-21283——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0007
CVE-2022-21284——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21285——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21286——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21287——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21288——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21289——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21290——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21291——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0007
CVE-2022-21293——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0007
CVE-2022-21294——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0007
CVE-2022-21296——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0007
CVE-2022-21297——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21299——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006 · NTAP-20220121-0007
CVE-2022-21301——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21302——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21303——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21304——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21305——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0007
CVE-2022-21307——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21308——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21309——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21310——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21311——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21312——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21313——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21314——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21315——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21316——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21317——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21318——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21319——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21320——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21321——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21322——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21323——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21324——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21325——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21326——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21327——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21328——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21329——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21330——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21331——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21332——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21333——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21334——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21335——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21336——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21337——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21339——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21340——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0007
CVE-2022-21341——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0007
CVE-2022-21342——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21344——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21348——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21349——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0007
CVE-2022-21351——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21352——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21355——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21356——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21357——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21358——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21360——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0007
CVE-2022-21362——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21365——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0007
CVE-2022-21366——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0007
CVE-2022-21367——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21368——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21370——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21372——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21374——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21378——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21379——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21380——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008
CVE-2022-21412——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220429-0005
CVE-2022-21413——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220429-0005
CVE-2022-21414——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220429-0005
CVE-2022-21415——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220429-0005
CVE-2022-21417——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220429-0005
CVE-2022-21418——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220429-0005
CVE-2022-21423——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220429-0005
CVE-2022-21425——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220429-0005
CVE-2022-21426——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220429-0006
CVE-2022-21427——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220429-0005
CVE-2022-21434——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006 · NTAP-20220429-0006
CVE-2022-21435——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220429-0005
CVE-2022-21436——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220429-0005
CVE-2022-21437——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220429-0005
CVE-2022-21438——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220429-0005
CVE-2022-21440——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220429-0005
CVE-2022-21443——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006 · NTAP-20220429-0006
CVE-2022-21444——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220429-0005
CVE-2022-21449——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220429-0006
CVE-2022-21451——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220429-0005
CVE-2022-21452——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220429-0005
CVE-2022-21454——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220429-0005
CVE-2022-21455——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0004
CVE-2022-21457——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220429-0005
CVE-2022-21459——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220429-0005
CVE-2022-21460——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220429-0005
CVE-2022-21462——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220429-0005
CVE-2022-21476——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220429-0006
CVE-2022-21478——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220429-0005
CVE-2022-21479——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220429-0005
CVE-2022-21482——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220429-0005
CVE-2022-21483——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220429-0005
CVE-2022-21484——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220429-0005
CVE-2022-21485——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220429-0005
CVE-2022-21486——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220429-0005
CVE-2022-21489——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220429-0005
CVE-2022-21490——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220429-0005
CVE-2022-21496——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006 · NTAP-20220429-0006
CVE-2022-21509——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0004
CVE-2022-21515——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0004
CVE-2022-21517——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0004
CVE-2022-21519——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0004
CVE-2022-21522——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0004
CVE-2022-21525——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0004
CVE-2022-21526——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0004
CVE-2022-21527——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0004
CVE-2022-21528——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0004
CVE-2022-21529——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0004
CVE-2022-21530——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0004
CVE-2022-21531——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0004
CVE-2022-21534——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0004
CVE-2022-21537——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0004
CVE-2022-21538——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0004
CVE-2022-21539——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0004
CVE-2022-21540——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0009
CVE-2022-21541——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0009
CVE-2022-21547——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0004
CVE-2022-21549——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0009
CVE-2022-21550——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0004
CVE-2022-21553——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0004
CVE-2022-21556——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0004
CVE-2022-21569——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0004
CVE-2022-21589——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0013
CVE-2022-21592——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0013
CVE-2022-21594——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0013
CVE-2022-21595——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0013
CVE-2022-21599——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0013
CVE-2022-21600——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0013
CVE-2022-21604——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0013
CVE-2022-21605——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0013
CVE-2022-21607——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0013
CVE-2022-21608——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0013
CVE-2022-21611——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0013
CVE-2022-21617——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0013
CVE-2022-21618——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0012
CVE-2022-21619——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0012
CVE-2022-21624——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0012
CVE-2022-21625——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0013
CVE-2022-21626——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0012
CVE-2022-21628——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0012
CVE-2022-21632——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0013
CVE-2022-21633——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0013
CVE-2022-21635——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0013
CVE-2022-21637——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0013
CVE-2022-21638——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0013
CVE-2022-21640——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0013
CVE-2022-21641——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0013
CVE-2022-21673——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220303-0004
CVE-2022-21676——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220209-0002
CVE-2022-21702——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220303-0005
CVE-2022-21703——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220303-0005
CVE-2022-21713——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220303-0005
CVE-2022-21716——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251017-0008
CVE-2022-21724——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220311-0005
CVE-2022-21824——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0004 · NTAP-20220325-0007
CVE-2022-21831——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221118-0001
CVE-2022-2191——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220909-0003
CVE-2022-2196——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230223-0002
CVE-2022-22389——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0007
CVE-2022-22390——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0007
CVE-2022-22483——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230921-0004
CVE-2022-225762022-05-26HIGH8.1An improper authentication vulnerability exists in curl 7.33.0 to and including 7.82.0 which might allow reuse OAUTH2-authenticated connections without properly NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220609-0008
CVE-2022-22577——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221118-0002
CVE-2022-22719——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220321-0001
CVE-2022-22720——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220321-0001
CVE-2022-22721——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220321-0001
CVE-2022-2274——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220715-0010
CVE-2022-22818——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220221-0003
CVE-2022-228222022-01-10CRITICAL9.8addBinding in xmlparse.c in Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.3 has an integer overflow. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220131-0004
CVE-2022-228232022-01-10CRITICAL9.8build_model in xmlparse.c in Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.3 has an integer overflow. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220131-0004
CVE-2022-228242022-01-10CRITICAL9.8defineAttribute in xmlparse.c in Expat (aka libexpat) before 2.4.3 has an integer overflow. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220131-0004

Years: 2026 · 2025 · 2024 · 2023 · 2022 · 2021 · 2020 · 2019 · 2018 · 2017 · 2016 · 2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 1999

← CVE index · Security hub