Home / Security / CVE index / 2022
2022 NetApp CVEs (page 3)
Showing 289 CVEs with a 2022 identifier — page 3 of 3. Sorted by CVE id.
Always verify. NetApp's advisory is authoritative for affected versions and fixes; NVD carries the CVSS record.
Showing 289 of 289
| CVE | Published | Severity | CVSS | Summary / Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2022-32149 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230203-0006 |
CVE-2022-32189 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220923-0003 |
CVE-2022-3219 | 2023-02-23 | LOW | 3.3 | GnuPG can be made to spin on a relatively small input by (for example) crafting a public key with thousands of signatures attached, compressed down to just a fe NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230324-0001 |
CVE-2022-32205 | 2022-07-07 | MEDIUM | 4.3 | A malicious server can serve excessive amounts of `Set-Cookie:` headers in a HTTP response to curl and curl < 7.84.0 stores all of them. A sufficiently large am NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220915-0003 |
CVE-2022-32206 | 2022-07-07 | MEDIUM | 6.5 | curl < 7.84.0 supports "chained" HTTP compression algorithms, meaning that a serverresponse can be compressed multiple times and potentially with different algo NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220915-0003 |
CVE-2022-32207 | 2022-07-07 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | When curl < 7.84.0 saves cookies, alt-svc and hsts data to local files, it makes the operation atomic by finalizing the operation with a rename from a temporary NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220915-0003 |
CVE-2022-32208 | 2022-07-07 | MEDIUM | 5.9 | When curl < 7.84.0 does FTP transfers secured by krb5, it handles message verification failures wrongly. This flaw makes it possible for a Man-In-The-Middle att NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220915-0003 |
CVE-2022-32212 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220915-0001 |
CVE-2022-32213 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220915-0001 |
CVE-2022-32214 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220915-0001 |
CVE-2022-32215 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220915-0001 |
CVE-2022-32221 | 2022-12-05 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | When doing HTTP(S) transfers, libcurl might erroneously use the read callback (`CURLOPT_READFUNCTION`) to ask for data to send, even when the `CURLOPT_POSTFIELD NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230208-0002 · NTAP-20230110-0006 |
CVE-2022-32222 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220915-0001 |
CVE-2022-32223 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220915-0001 |
CVE-2022-32224 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250605-0007 |
CVE-2022-32231 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230302-0011 |
CVE-2022-32250 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220715-0005 |
CVE-2022-32275 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220715-0008 |
CVE-2022-3239 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230214-0006 |
CVE-2022-32532 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220812-0002 |
CVE-2022-32742 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0010 |
CVE-2022-32744 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0010 |
CVE-2022-32745 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0010 |
CVE-2022-32746 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0010 |
CVE-2022-3294 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230505-0007 |
CVE-2022-32981 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220722-0006 |
CVE-2022-33105 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0005 |
CVE-2022-33178 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230127-0003 |
CVE-2022-33179 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230127-0004 |
CVE-2022-33180 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230127-0005 |
CVE-2022-33181 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230127-0006 |
CVE-2022-33182 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230127-0007 |
CVE-2022-33183 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230127-0008 |
CVE-2022-33184 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230127-0009 |
CVE-2022-33185 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230127-0010 |
CVE-2022-33186 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221110-0001 |
CVE-2022-33187 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221128-0002 |
CVE-2022-3358 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0014 |
CVE-2022-33879 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220812-0004 |
CVE-2022-33894 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230921-0002 |
CVE-2022-33972 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230302-0012 |
CVE-2022-33980 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0015 |
CVE-2022-34169 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006 · NTAP-20220729-0009 |
CVE-2022-3424 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230406-0005 |
CVE-2022-34265 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220818-0006 |
CVE-2022-34305 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0006 |
CVE-2022-34339 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0016 |
CVE-2022-34357 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006 · NTAP-20240405-0001 |
CVE-2022-3437 | 2023-01-12 | MEDIUM | 6.5 | A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability was found in Samba within the GSSAPI unwrap_des() and unwrap_des3() routines of Heimdal. The DES and Triple-DES decry NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230216-0008 · NTAP-20221028-0011 |
CVE-2022-34526 | 2022-07-29 | MEDIUM | 6.5 | A stack overflow was discovered in the _TIFFVGetField function of Tiffsplit v4.4.0. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220930-0002 |
CVE-2022-3488 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230223-0009 |
CVE-2022-34903 | 2022-07-01 | MEDIUM | 6.5 | GnuPG through 2.3.6, in unusual situations where an attacker possesses any secret-key information from a victim's keyring and other constraints (e.g., use of GP NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220826-0005 |
CVE-2022-34918 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220826-0004 |
CVE-2022-3515 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230706-0008 |
CVE-2022-3520 | 2022-12-02 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Heap-based Buffer Overflow in GitHub repository vim/vim prior to 9.0.0765. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241115-0010 |
CVE-2022-35205 | 2023-08-22 | MEDIUM | 5.5 | An issue was discovered in Binutils readelf 2.38.50, reachable assertion failure in function display_debug_names allows attackers to cause a denial of service. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231006-0010 |
CVE-2022-35252 | 2022-09-23 | LOW | 3.7 | When curl is used to retrieve and parse cookies from a HTTP(S) server, itaccepts cookies using control codes that when later are sent back to a HTTPserver might NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220930-0005 |
CVE-2022-35255 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230113-0002 |
CVE-2022-35260 | 2022-12-05 | MEDIUM | 6.5 | curl can be told to parse a `.netrc` file for credentials. If that file endsin a line with 4095 consecutive non-white space letters and no newline, curlwould fi NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230110-0006 |
CVE-2022-35278 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221209-0005 |
CVE-2022-3541 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221228-0001 |
CVE-2022-3545 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221223-0003 |
CVE-2022-35637 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230921-0003 |
CVE-2022-3564 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221223-0001 |
CVE-2022-3570 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230203-0002 |
CVE-2022-35737 | 2022-08-03 | HIGH | 7.5 | SQLite 1.0.12 through 3.39.x before 3.39.2 sometimes allows an array-bounds overflow if billions of bytes are used in a string argument to a C API. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220915-0009 |
CVE-2022-35912 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220812-0005 |
CVE-2022-3592 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0011 |
CVE-2022-35951 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221020-0005 |
CVE-2022-35957 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221215-0001 |
CVE-2022-3597 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230110-0001 |
CVE-2022-35977 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230302-0006 |
CVE-2022-3598 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230110-0001 |
CVE-2022-3599 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230110-0001 |
CVE-2022-3602 | 2022-11-01 | HIGH | 7.5 | A buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chain sig NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221102-0001 |
CVE-2022-36021 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230331-0002 |
CVE-2022-36033 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221104-0006 |
CVE-2022-36062 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221215-0001 |
CVE-2022-36067 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221017-0002 |
CVE-2022-36123 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220901-0003 |
CVE-2022-36129 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220901-0011 |
CVE-2022-3626 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230110-0001 |
CVE-2022-3627 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230110-0001 |
CVE-2022-36313 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220909-0005 |
CVE-2022-36359 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220915-0008 |
CVE-2022-36392 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230824-0002 |
CVE-2022-3649 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230214-0009 |
CVE-2022-36648 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231006-0004 |
CVE-2022-36760 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230216-0007 |
CVE-2022-36773 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221014-0005 |
CVE-2022-36879 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220901-0007 |
CVE-2022-36946 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220901-0007 |
CVE-2022-37026 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250605-0008 |
CVE-2022-3705 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221223-0004 |
CVE-2022-3715 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241108-0002 |
CVE-2022-37341 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250718-0012 |
CVE-2022-37343 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230824-0001 |
CVE-2022-3736 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230223-0009 |
CVE-2022-37434 | 2022-08-05 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | zlib through 1.2.12 has a heap-based buffer over-read or buffer overflow in inflate in inflate.c via a large gzip header extra field. NOTE: only applications th NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230427-0007 · NTAP-20220901-0005 |
CVE-2022-37436 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230216-0007 |
CVE-2022-37454 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230203-0001 |
CVE-2022-37708 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230309-0008 |
CVE-2022-3786 | 2022-11-01 | HIGH | 7.5 | A buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chain sig NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221102-0001 |
CVE-2022-37966 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230110-0003 |
CVE-2022-37967 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230110-0003 |
CVE-2022-38023 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230110-0003 |
CVE-2022-38083 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230824-0001 |
CVE-2022-38087 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231124-0006 |
CVE-2022-38102 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230824-0002 |
CVE-2022-38177 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221228-0010 |
CVE-2022-38178 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221228-0009 |
CVE-2022-38533 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221104-0007 |
CVE-2022-3857 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230406-0004 |
CVE-2022-38708 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230113-0003 |
CVE-2022-3872 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221215-0005 |
CVE-2022-38732 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220926-0001 |
CVE-2022-38733 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221220-0001 |
CVE-2022-38734 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230228-0001 |
CVE-2022-38749 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240315-0010 |
CVE-2022-38750 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240315-0010 |
CVE-2022-38751 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240315-0010 |
CVE-2022-38752 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240315-0009 |
CVE-2022-38791 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221104-0008 |
CVE-2022-39046 | 2022-08-31 | HIGH | 7.5 | An issue was discovered in the GNU C Library (glibc) 2.36. When the syslog function is passed a crafted input string larger than 1024 bytes, it reads uninitiali NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221104-0002 |
CVE-2022-39160 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230113-0003 |
CVE-2022-39176 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221020-0002 |
CVE-2022-39177 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221020-0002 |
CVE-2022-39189 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230214-0007 |
CVE-2022-3920 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221223-0010 |
CVE-2022-3924 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230223-0009 |
CVE-2022-39306 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221215-0004 |
CVE-2022-39307 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221215-0004 |
CVE-2022-39324 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230309-0010 |
CVE-2022-39328 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221215-0003 |
CVE-2022-39399 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0012 |
CVE-2022-39400 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0013 |
CVE-2022-39408 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0013 |
CVE-2022-39410 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0013 |
CVE-2022-3970 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221215-0009 |
CVE-2022-3977 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230223-0005 |
CVE-2022-3996 | 2022-12-13 | HIGH | 7.5 | If an X.509 certificate contains a malformed policy constraint and policy processing is enabled, then a write lock will be taken twice recursively. On some oper NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230203-0003 |
CVE-2022-40186 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221111-0008 |
CVE-2022-40242 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221215-0007 |
CVE-2022-40258 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230731-0008 |
CVE-2022-40259 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221215-0007 |
CVE-2022-40303 | 2022-11-23 | HIGH | 7.5 | An issue was discovered in libxml2 before 2.10.3. When parsing a multi-gigabyte XML document with the XML_PARSE_HUGE parser option enabled, several integer coun NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221209-0003 |
CVE-2022-40304 | 2022-11-23 | HIGH | 7.8 | An issue was discovered in libxml2 before 2.10.3. Certain invalid XML entity definitions can corrupt a hash table key, potentially leading to subsequent logic e NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221209-0003 |
CVE-2022-40540 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230616-0001 |
CVE-2022-40664 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221118-0005 |
CVE-2022-40674 | 2022-09-14 | HIGH | 8.1 | libexpat before 2.4.9 has a use-after-free in the doContent function in xmlparse.c. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0008 |
CVE-2022-40735 | 2022-11-14 | HIGH | 7.5 | The Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Protocol allows use of long exponents that arguably make certain calculations unnecessarily expensive, because the 1996 van Oor NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260227-0008 |
CVE-2022-40897 | 2022-12-23 | MEDIUM | 5.9 | Python Packaging Authority (PyPA) setuptools before 65.5.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via HTML in a crafted package or custom PackageI NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006 · NTAP-20230214-0001 |
CVE-2022-4095 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230420-0005 |
CVE-2022-40982 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230811-0001 |
CVE-2022-41222 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230214-0008 |
CVE-2022-41296 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230120-0003 |
CVE-2022-41316 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221201-0001 |
CVE-2022-41317 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230216-0004 |
CVE-2022-41318 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230216-0004 |
CVE-2022-41323 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221124-0001 |
CVE-2022-4139 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230309-0004 |
CVE-2022-41409 | 2023-07-18 | HIGH | 7.5 | Integer overflow vulnerability in pcre2test before 10.41 allows attackers to cause a denial of service or other unspecified impacts via negative input. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260320-0014 |
CVE-2022-4144 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230127-0012 |
CVE-2022-41678 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240216-0004 |
CVE-2022-41715 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230120-0006 |
CVE-2022-41716 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230120-0007 |
CVE-2022-41717 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230120-0008 |
CVE-2022-4172 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230127-0013 |
CVE-2022-41723 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230331-0010 |
CVE-2022-41724 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230331-0009 |
CVE-2022-41725 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230331-0009 |
CVE-2022-41741 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230120-0005 |
CVE-2022-41742 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230120-0005 |
CVE-2022-41804 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230915-0003 |
CVE-2022-41854 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006 · NTAP-20240315-0009 |
CVE-2022-41858 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230223-0006 |
CVE-2022-41862 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230427-0002 |
CVE-2022-41881 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230113-0004 |
CVE-2022-41915 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230113-0004 |
CVE-2022-41916 | 2022-11-15 | MEDIUM | 5.9 | Heimdal is an implementation of ASN.1/DER, PKIX, and Kerberos. Versions prior to 7.7.1 are vulnerable to a denial of service vulnerability in Heimdal's PKI cert NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230216-0008 |
CVE-2022-41946 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240329-0003 |
CVE-2022-41966 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230216-0005 |
CVE-2022-42003 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221124-0004 |
CVE-2022-42004 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221118-0008 |
CVE-2022-4203 | 2023-02-24 | MEDIUM | 4.9 | A read buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chai NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230214-0011 |
CVE-2022-42252 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221223-0005 |
CVE-2022-4269 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230929-0001 |
CVE-2022-42719 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230203-0008 |
CVE-2022-42720 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230203-0008 |
CVE-2022-42721 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230203-0008 |
CVE-2022-42722 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230203-0008 |
CVE-2022-4283 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230127-0011 |
CVE-2022-42889 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221020-0004 |
CVE-2022-4289 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240415-0004 |
CVE-2022-42898 | 2022-12-25 | HIGH | 8.8 | PAC parsing in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) before 1.19.4 and 1.20.x before 1.20.1 has integer overflows that may lead to remote code execution (in KDC, kadmind, o NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230223-0001 · NTAP-20230216-0008 +1 |
CVE-2022-42915 | 2022-10-29 | HIGH | 8.1 | curl before 7.86.0 has a double free. If curl is told to use an HTTP proxy for a transfer with a non-HTTP(S) URL, it sets up the connection to the remote server NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221209-0010 |
CVE-2022-42916 | 2022-10-29 | HIGH | 7.5 | In curl before 7.86.0, the HSTS check could be bypassed to trick it into staying with HTTP. Using its HSTS support, curl can be instructed to use HTTPS directly NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221209-0010 |
CVE-2022-42919 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221209-0006 |
CVE-2022-4292 | 2022-12-05 | HIGH | 7.8 | Use After Free in GitHub repository vim/vim prior to 9.0.0882. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230113-0005 |
CVE-2022-4293 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230203-0007 |
CVE-2022-42969 | 2022-10-16 | MEDIUM | 5.3 | The py library through 1.11.0 for Python allows remote attackers to conduct a ReDoS (Regular expression Denial of Service) attack via a Subversion repository wi NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260917-0001 |
CVE-2022-4304 | 2023-02-08 | MEDIUM | 5.9 | A timing based side channel exists in the OpenSSL RSA Decryption implementation which could be sufficient to recover a plaintext across a network in a Bleichenb NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230214-0011 |
CVE-2022-43505 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230824-0001 |
CVE-2022-43548 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230427-0007 · NTAP-20230120-0004 |
CVE-2022-43551 | 2022-12-23 | HIGH | 7.5 | A vulnerability exists in curl <7.87.0 HSTS check that could be bypassed to trick it to keep using HTTP. Using its HSTS support, curl can be instructed to use H NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230427-0007 · NTAP-20230214-0002 |
CVE-2022-43552 | 2023-02-09 | MEDIUM | 5.9 | A use after free vulnerability exists in curl <7.87.0. Curl can be asked to *tunnel* virtually all protocols it supports through an HTTP proxy. HTTP proxies can NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230214-0002 |
CVE-2022-43680 | 2022-10-24 | HIGH | 7.5 | In libexpat through 2.4.9, there is a use-after free caused by overeager destruction of a shared DTD in XML_ExternalEntityParserCreate in out-of-memory situatio NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221118-0007 |
CVE-2022-4379 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230223-0004 |
CVE-2022-43883 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230113-0003 |
CVE-2022-43887 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230113-0003 |
CVE-2022-43927 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230302-0009 |
CVE-2022-43929 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230302-0009 |
CVE-2022-43930 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230302-0009 |
CVE-2022-43933 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221128-0003 |
CVE-2022-43934 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221128-0004 |
CVE-2022-43935 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221128-0005 |
CVE-2022-43936 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221128-0006 |
CVE-2022-43937 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240229-0005 |
CVE-2022-43945 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221215-0006 |
CVE-2022-4415 | 2023-01-11 | MEDIUM | 5.5 | A vulnerability was found in systemd. This security flaw can cause a local information leak due to systemd-coredump not respecting the fs.suid_dumpable kernel s NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230216-0010 |
CVE-2022-4450 | 2023-02-08 | HIGH | 7.5 | The function PEM_read_bio_ex() reads a PEM file from a BIO and parses and decodes the "name" (e.g. "CERTIFICATE"), any header data and the payload data. If the NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230214-0011 |
CVE-2022-44570 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231208-0010 |
CVE-2022-44571 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231208-0013 |
CVE-2022-44572 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231208-0014 |
CVE-2022-44611 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230824-0001 |
CVE-2022-44640 | 2022-12-25 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Heimdal before 7.7.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code because of an invalid free in the ASN.1 codec used by the Key Distribution Center (KDC). NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230216-0008 |
CVE-2022-44792 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230223-0011 |
CVE-2022-44793 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230223-0011 |
CVE-2022-4492 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230324-0002 |
CVE-2022-45047 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240216-0008 |
CVE-2022-45061 | 2022-11-09 | HIGH | 7.5 | An issue was discovered in Python before 3.11.1. An unnecessary quadratic algorithm exists in one path when processing some inputs to the IDNA (RFC 3490) decode NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221209-0007 |
CVE-2022-45141 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230110-0003 |
CVE-2022-45143 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230216-0009 |
CVE-2022-45703 | 2023-08-22 | HIGH | 7.8 | Heap buffer overflow vulnerability in binutils readelf before 2.40 via function display_debug_section in file readelf.c. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231006-0003 |
CVE-2022-45884 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230113-0006 |
CVE-2022-45885 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230113-0006 |
CVE-2022-45886 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230113-0006 |
CVE-2022-45887 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230113-0006 |
CVE-2022-45888 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230113-0006 |
CVE-2022-45919 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230113-0008 |
CVE-2022-45934 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230113-0008 |
CVE-2022-46340 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230127-0011 |
CVE-2022-46341 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230127-0011 |
CVE-2022-46342 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230127-0011 |
CVE-2022-46343 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230127-0011 |
CVE-2022-46344 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230127-0011 |
CVE-2022-46363 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230120-0002 |
CVE-2022-46364 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230120-0002 |
CVE-2022-4645 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230331-0001 |
CVE-2022-46908 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230203-0005 |
CVE-2022-4696 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230223-0003 |
CVE-2022-47015 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230309-0009 |
CVE-2022-4744 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230526-0009 |
CVE-2022-47518 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230113-0007 |
CVE-2022-47519 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230113-0007 |
CVE-2022-47520 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230113-0007 |
CVE-2022-47521 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230113-0007 |
CVE-2022-47629 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230316-0011 |
CVE-2022-47938 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230110-0004 |
CVE-2022-47939 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230110-0004 |
CVE-2022-47940 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230110-0005 |
CVE-2022-47941 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230110-0004 |
CVE-2022-47942 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230110-0005 |
CVE-2022-47943 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230216-0006 |
CVE-2022-48063 | 2023-08-22 | MEDIUM | 5.5 | GNU Binutils before 2.40 was discovered to contain an excessive memory consumption vulnerability via the function load_separate_debug_files at dwarf2.c. The att NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231006-0008 |
CVE-2022-48064 | 2023-08-22 | MEDIUM | 5.5 | GNU Binutils before 2.40 was discovered to contain an excessive memory consumption vulnerability via the function bfd_dwarf2_find_nearest_line_with_alt at dwarf NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231006-0008 |
CVE-2022-48065 | 2023-08-22 | MEDIUM | 5.5 | GNU Binutils before 2.40 was discovered to contain a memory leak vulnerability var the function find_abstract_instance in dwarf2.c. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231006-0008 |
CVE-2022-48174 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241129-0001 |
CVE-2022-48281 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230302-0004 |
CVE-2022-48282 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230324-0003 |
CVE-2022-48285 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0005 |
CVE-2022-48423 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230505-0003 |
CVE-2022-48424 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230505-0002 |
CVE-2022-48425 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230413-0006 |
CVE-2022-48502 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230703-0004 |
CVE-2022-48522 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230915-0008 |
CVE-2022-48554 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231116-0002 |
CVE-2022-48560 | 2023-08-22 | HIGH | 7.5 | A use-after-free exists in Python through 3.9 via heappushpop in heapq. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230929-0008 |
CVE-2022-48564 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230929-0009 |
CVE-2022-48565 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231006-0007 |
CVE-2022-48566 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231006-0013 |
CVE-2022-48624 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240605-0010 |
CVE-2022-48655 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240912-0008 |
CVE-2022-4886 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240307-0013 |
CVE-2022-4899 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230725-0005 |
CVE-2022-4900 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231130-0008 |
CVE-2022-49043 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251024-0011 |
CVE-2022-4909 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260116-0013 |
CVE-2022-4967 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240614-0006 |
Years: 2026 · 2025 · 2024 · 2023 · 2022 · 2021 · 2020 · 2019 · 2018 · 2017 · 2016 · 2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 1999