Home / Security / CVE index / 2019
2019 NetApp CVEs
Showing 300 CVEs with a 2019 identifier — page 1 of 3. Sorted by CVE id.
Always verify. NetApp's advisory is authoritative for affected versions and fixes; NVD carries the CVSS record.
Showing 300 of 300
| CVE | Published | Severity | CVSS | Summary / Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2019-0086 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190515-0002 |
CVE-2019-0089 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190515-0002 |
CVE-2019-0090 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190515-0002 |
CVE-2019-0091 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190515-0002 |
CVE-2019-0092 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190515-0002 |
CVE-2019-0093 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190515-0002 |
CVE-2019-0094 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190515-0002 |
CVE-2019-0096 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190515-0002 |
CVE-2019-0097 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190515-0002 |
CVE-2019-0098 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190515-0002 |
CVE-2019-0099 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190515-0002 |
CVE-2019-0117 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191113-0006 |
CVE-2019-0119 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190516-0001 |
CVE-2019-0120 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190516-0001 |
CVE-2019-0126 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190516-0001 |
CVE-2019-0131 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191213-0001 |
CVE-2019-0139 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191113-0001 |
CVE-2019-0140 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191113-0001 |
CVE-2019-0142 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191113-0001 |
CVE-2019-0143 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191113-0001 |
CVE-2019-0144 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191113-0001 |
CVE-2019-0145 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191113-0001 |
CVE-2019-0146 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191113-0001 |
CVE-2019-0147 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191113-0001 |
CVE-2019-0148 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191113-0001 |
CVE-2019-0149 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191113-0001 |
CVE-2019-0150 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191113-0001 |
CVE-2019-0151 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191113-0002 |
CVE-2019-0152 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191113-0002 |
CVE-2019-0153 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190515-0002 |
CVE-2019-0154 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200320-0004 |
CVE-2019-0155 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200320-0005 |
CVE-2019-0165 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191213-0001 |
CVE-2019-0166 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191213-0001 |
CVE-2019-0168 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191213-0001 |
CVE-2019-0169 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191213-0001 |
CVE-2019-0170 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190515-0002 |
CVE-2019-0174 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190612-0001 |
CVE-2019-0184 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191113-0007 |
CVE-2019-0185 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191113-0008 |
CVE-2019-0190 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190125-0001 |
CVE-2019-0192 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190327-0003 |
CVE-2019-0196 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190617-0002 |
CVE-2019-0197 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190617-0002 |
CVE-2019-0199 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190419-0001 |
CVE-2019-0201 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190619-0001 |
CVE-2019-0211 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0001 |
CVE-2019-0215 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0001 |
CVE-2019-0217 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0001 |
CVE-2019-0220 | 2019-06-11 | MEDIUM | 5.3 | A vulnerability was found in Apache HTTP Server 2.4.0 to 2.4.38. When the path component of a request URL contains multiple consecutive slashes ('/'), directive NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190625-0007 |
CVE-2019-0221 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190606-0001 |
CVE-2019-0222 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190502-0006 |
CVE-2019-0227 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006 |
CVE-2019-0230 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200821-0004 |
CVE-2019-0232 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190419-0001 |
CVE-2019-0233 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200821-0004 |
CVE-2019-1002100 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190416-0002 |
CVE-2019-10071 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190910-0004 |
CVE-2019-10072 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190625-0002 |
CVE-2019-10081 | 2019-08-15 | HIGH | 7.5 | HTTP/2 (2.4.20 through 2.4.39) very early pushes, for example configured with "H2PushResource", could lead to an overwrite of memory in the pushing request's po NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0003 |
CVE-2019-10082 | 2019-09-26 | CRITICAL | 9.1 | In Apache HTTP Server 2.4.18-2.4.39, using fuzzed network input, the http/2 session handling could be made to read memory after being freed, during connection s NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0003 |
CVE-2019-10086 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250725-0005 |
CVE-2019-10088 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190828-0004 |
CVE-2019-10092 | 2019-09-26 | MEDIUM | 6.1 | In Apache HTTP Server 2.4.0-2.4.39, a limited cross-site scripting issue was reported affecting the mod_proxy error page. An attacker could cause the link on th NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0003 |
CVE-2019-10093 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190828-0004 |
CVE-2019-10094 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190828-0004 |
CVE-2019-10097 | 2019-09-26 | HIGH | 7.2 | In Apache HTTP Server 2.4.32-2.4.39, when mod_remoteip was configured to use a trusted intermediary proxy server using the "PROXY" protocol, a specially crafted NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0003 |
CVE-2019-10098 | 2019-09-25 | MEDIUM | 6.1 | In Apache HTTP server 2.4.0 to 2.4.39, Redirects configured with mod_rewrite that were intended to be self-referential might be fooled by encoded newlines and r NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0003 |
CVE-2019-10101 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230818-0012 |
CVE-2019-10102 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230818-0012 |
CVE-2019-1010204 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190822-0001 |
CVE-2019-1010266 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190919-0004 |
CVE-2019-10103 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230818-0012 |
CVE-2019-10125 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190411-0003 |
CVE-2019-10126 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190710-0002 |
CVE-2019-10127 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210430-0004 |
CVE-2019-10128 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210430-0004 |
CVE-2019-10140 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0002 |
CVE-2019-10158 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231227-0009 |
CVE-2019-10160 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190617-0003 |
CVE-2019-10161 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190705-0001 |
CVE-2019-10166 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190705-0001 |
CVE-2019-10167 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190705-0001 |
CVE-2019-10168 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190705-0001 |
CVE-2019-10174 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0018 |
CVE-2019-10184 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0016 |
CVE-2019-10197 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190903-0001 |
CVE-2019-10207 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200103-0001 |
CVE-2019-10212 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0017 |
CVE-2019-10218 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191031-0001 |
CVE-2019-10219 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0024 |
CVE-2019-10220 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200103-0001 |
CVE-2019-10241 | 2019-04-22 | MEDIUM | 6.1 | In Eclipse Jetty version 9.2.26 and older, 9.3.25 and older, and 9.4.15 and older, the server is vulnerable to XSS conditions if a remote client USES a speciall NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190509-0003 |
CVE-2019-10246 | 2019-04-22 | MEDIUM | 5.3 | In Eclipse Jetty version 9.2.27, 9.3.26, and 9.4.16, the server running on Windows is vulnerable to exposure of the fully qualified Base Resource directory name NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190509-0003 |
CVE-2019-10247 | 2019-04-22 | MEDIUM | 5.3 | In Eclipse Jetty version 7.x, 8.x, 9.2.27 and older, 9.3.26 and older, and 9.4.16 and older, the server running on any OS and Jetty version combination will rev NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190509-0003 |
CVE-2019-10638 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190806-0001 |
CVE-2019-10639 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190806-0001 |
CVE-2019-10744 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191004-0005 |
CVE-2019-11034 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190502-0001 |
CVE-2019-11035 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190502-0001 |
CVE-2019-11036 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190517-0003 |
CVE-2019-11041 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190822-0003 |
CVE-2019-11042 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190822-0003 |
CVE-2019-11043 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191031-0003 |
CVE-2019-11044 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200103-0002 |
CVE-2019-11045 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200103-0002 |
CVE-2019-11046 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200103-0002 |
CVE-2019-11047 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200103-0002 |
CVE-2019-11048 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200528-0006 |
CVE-2019-11049 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200103-0002 |
CVE-2019-11050 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200103-0002 |
CVE-2019-11068 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0001 |
CVE-2019-11086 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191213-0001 |
CVE-2019-11087 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191213-0001 |
CVE-2019-11088 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191213-0001 |
CVE-2019-11089 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200320-0005 |
CVE-2019-11090 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191213-0001 |
CVE-2019-11091 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190515-0001 |
CVE-2019-11097 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191213-0001 |
CVE-2019-11100 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191213-0001 |
CVE-2019-11101 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191213-0001 |
CVE-2019-11102 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191213-0001 |
CVE-2019-11103 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191213-0001 |
CVE-2019-11104 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191213-0001 |
CVE-2019-11105 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191213-0001 |
CVE-2019-11106 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191213-0001 |
CVE-2019-11107 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191213-0001 |
CVE-2019-11108 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191213-0001 |
CVE-2019-11109 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191213-0001 |
CVE-2019-11110 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191213-0001 |
CVE-2019-11111 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200320-0005 |
CVE-2019-11112 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200320-0005 |
CVE-2019-11113 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200320-0005 |
CVE-2019-11131 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191213-0001 |
CVE-2019-11132 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191213-0001 |
CVE-2019-11135 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191113-0009 |
CVE-2019-11136 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191113-0004 |
CVE-2019-11137 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191113-0004 |
CVE-2019-11139 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191113-0005 |
CVE-2019-11147 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191213-0001 |
CVE-2019-11157 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191217-0001 |
CVE-2019-11184 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190926-0001 |
CVE-2019-11243 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190509-0002 |
CVE-2019-11244 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190509-0002 |
CVE-2019-11245 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190919-0003 |
CVE-2019-11246 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190919-0003 |
CVE-2019-11247 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190919-0003 |
CVE-2019-11248 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190919-0003 |
CVE-2019-11249 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190919-0003 |
CVE-2019-1125 | 2019-09-03 | MEDIUM | 5.6 | An information disclosure vulnerability exists when certain central processing units (CPU) speculatively access memory. An attacker who successfully exploited t NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190809-0002 |
CVE-2019-11250 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190919-0003 |
CVE-2019-11253 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191031-0006 |
CVE-2019-11254 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200413-0003 |
CVE-2019-11255 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200810-0003 |
CVE-2019-11358 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190919-0001 |
CVE-2019-11477 | 2019-06-19 | HIGH | 7.5 | Jonathan Looney discovered that the TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_gso_segs value was subject to an integer overflow in the Linux kernel when handling TCP Selective Ackno NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190625-0001 |
CVE-2019-11478 | 2019-06-19 | MEDIUM | 5.3 | Jonathan Looney discovered that the TCP retransmission queue implementation in tcp_fragment in the Linux kernel could be fragmented when handling certain TCP Se NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190625-0001 |
CVE-2019-11479 | 2019-06-19 | HIGH | 7.5 | Jonathan Looney discovered that the Linux kernel default MSS is hard-coded to 48 bytes. This allows a remote peer to fragment TCP resend queues significantly mo NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190625-0001 |
CVE-2019-11486 | 2019-04-23 | HIGH | 7.0 | The Siemens R3964 line discipline driver in drivers/tty/n_r3964.c in the Linux kernel before 5.0.8 has multiple race conditions. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190517-0005 |
CVE-2019-11487 | 2019-04-23 | HIGH | 7.8 | The Linux kernel before 5.1-rc5 allows page->_refcount reference count overflow, with resultant use-after-free issues, if about 140 GiB of RAM exists. This is r NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190517-0005 |
CVE-2019-11599 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200608-0001 · NTAP-20190517-0002 |
CVE-2019-11683 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190517-0002 |
CVE-2019-11810 | 2019-05-07 | HIGH | 7.5 | An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel before 5.0.7. A NULL pointer dereference can occur when megasas_create_frame_pool() fails in megasas_alloc_cmds() in NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0003 |
CVE-2019-11811 | 2019-05-07 | HIGH | 7.0 | An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel before 5.0.4. There is a use-after-free upon attempted read access to /proc/ioports after the ipmi_si module is remo NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0003 |
CVE-2019-11815 | 2019-05-08 | HIGH | 8.1 | An issue was discovered in rds_tcp_kill_sock in net/rds/tcp.c in the Linux kernel before 5.0.8. There is a race condition leading to a use-after-free, related t NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0003 |
CVE-2019-11840 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251024-0004 |
CVE-2019-12067 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210727-0001 |
CVE-2019-12086 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190530-0003 |
CVE-2019-12255 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190802-0001 |
CVE-2019-12256 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190802-0001 |
CVE-2019-12257 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190802-0001 |
CVE-2019-12258 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190802-0001 |
CVE-2019-12259 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190802-0001 |
CVE-2019-12260 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190802-0001 |
CVE-2019-12261 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190802-0001 |
CVE-2019-12262 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190802-0001 |
CVE-2019-12263 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190802-0001 |
CVE-2019-12264 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190802-0001 |
CVE-2019-12265 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190802-0001 |
CVE-2019-12379 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190710-0002 |
CVE-2019-12380 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190710-0002 |
CVE-2019-12384 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190703-0002 |
CVE-2019-12400 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190910-0003 |
CVE-2019-12401 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190926-0002 |
CVE-2019-12402 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230818-0001 |
CVE-2019-12418 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200107-0001 |
CVE-2019-12435 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190619-0006 |
CVE-2019-12436 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190619-0006 |
CVE-2019-12450 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190606-0003 |
CVE-2019-12455 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190710-0002 |
CVE-2019-12519 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210205-0006 |
CVE-2019-12520 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210205-0006 |
CVE-2019-12521 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210205-0006 |
CVE-2019-12522 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210205-0006 |
CVE-2019-12524 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210205-0006 |
CVE-2019-12532 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220223-0004 |
CVE-2019-12614 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190710-0002 |
CVE-2019-12615 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190710-0002 |
CVE-2019-12749 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241206-0010 |
CVE-2019-12781 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190705-0002 |
CVE-2019-12814 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190625-0006 |
CVE-2019-12818 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190710-0002 |
CVE-2019-12819 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190710-0002 |
CVE-2019-12875 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190625-0005 |
CVE-2019-12881 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190710-0002 |
CVE-2019-12984 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190806-0001 |
CVE-2019-13012 | 2019-06-28 | HIGH | 7.5 | The keyfile settings backend in GNOME GLib (aka glib2.0) before 2.60.0 creates directories using g_file_make_directory_with_parents (kfsb->dir, NULL, NULL) and NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190806-0003 |
CVE-2019-13057 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190822-0004 |
CVE-2019-13068 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190710-0001 |
CVE-2019-13115 | 2019-07-16 | HIGH | 8.1 | In libssh2 before 1.9.0, kex_method_diffie_hellman_group_exchange_sha256_key_exchange in kex.c has an integer overflow that could lead to an out-of-bounds read NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190806-0002 |
CVE-2019-13117 | 2019-07-01 | MEDIUM | 5.3 | In numbers.c in libxslt 1.1.33, an xsl:number with certain format strings could lead to a uninitialized read in xsltNumberFormatInsertNumbers. This could allow NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200122-0003 · NTAP-20190806-0004 |
CVE-2019-13118 | 2019-07-01 | MEDIUM | 5.3 | In numbers.c in libxslt 1.1.33, a type holding grouping characters of an xsl:number instruction was too narrow and an invalid character/length combination could NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200122-0003 · NTAP-20190806-0004 |
CVE-2019-13139 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190910-0001 |
CVE-2019-13232 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190814-0002 |
CVE-2019-13233 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190806-0001 |
CVE-2019-13272 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190806-0001 |
CVE-2019-13509 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190828-0003 |
CVE-2019-13631 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190806-0001 |
CVE-2019-13636 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190828-0001 |
CVE-2019-13638 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190828-0001 |
CVE-2019-13648 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190806-0001 |
CVE-2019-13990 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0002 |
CVE-2019-14232 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190828-0002 |
CVE-2019-14233 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190828-0002 |
CVE-2019-14234 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190828-0002 |
CVE-2019-14235 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190828-0002 |
CVE-2019-14250 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190822-0002 |
CVE-2019-14271 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190828-0003 |
CVE-2019-14283 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0002 |
CVE-2019-14284 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0002 |
CVE-2019-14287 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0003 |
CVE-2019-14379 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190814-0001 |
CVE-2019-14439 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190814-0001 |
CVE-2019-14444 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190822-0002 |
CVE-2019-14540 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191004-0002 |
CVE-2019-14574 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200320-0005 |
CVE-2019-14590 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200320-0005 |
CVE-2019-14591 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200320-0005 |
CVE-2019-14598 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200221-0005 |
CVE-2019-14607 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191217-0002 |
CVE-2019-14814 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191031-0005 |
CVE-2019-14815 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200103-0001 |
CVE-2019-14816 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191031-0005 |
CVE-2019-14821 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191004-0001 |
CVE-2019-14833 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191031-0001 |
CVE-2019-14835 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191031-0005 |
CVE-2019-14844 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220325-0003 |
CVE-2019-14847 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191031-0002 |
CVE-2019-14861 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191210-0002 |
CVE-2019-14870 | 2019-12-10 | MEDIUM | 5.4 | All Samba versions 4.x.x before 4.9.17, 4.10.x before 4.10.11 and 4.11.x before 4.11.3 have an issue, where the S4U (MS-SFU) Kerberos delegation model includes NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230216-0008 · NTAP-20191210-0002 |
CVE-2019-14887 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200327-0007 |
CVE-2019-14888 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220211-0001 |
CVE-2019-14892 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200904-0005 |
CVE-2019-14893 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200327-0006 |
CVE-2019-14896 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200103-0001 |
CVE-2019-14898 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200608-0001 |
CVE-2019-14900 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0020 |
CVE-2019-14902 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200122-0001 |
CVE-2019-14907 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200122-0001 |
CVE-2019-15030 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191004-0001 |
CVE-2019-15031 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191004-0001 |
CVE-2019-15043 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191004-0004 |
CVE-2019-15090 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0002 |
CVE-2019-15098 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0002 |
CVE-2019-15099 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0002 |
CVE-2019-15117 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0002 |
CVE-2019-15118 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0002 |
CVE-2019-15138 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0005 |
CVE-2019-15166 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200120-0001 |
CVE-2019-15211 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0002 |
CVE-2019-15212 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0002 |
CVE-2019-15213 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0002 |
CVE-2019-15214 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0002 |
CVE-2019-15215 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0002 |
CVE-2019-15216 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0002 |
CVE-2019-15217 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0002 |
CVE-2019-15218 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0002 |
CVE-2019-15219 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0002 |
CVE-2019-15220 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0002 |
CVE-2019-15221 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0002 |
CVE-2019-15222 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0002 |
CVE-2019-15223 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0002 |
CVE-2019-15290 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0002 |
CVE-2019-15291 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0002 |
CVE-2019-15292 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0002 |
CVE-2019-1543 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190314-0002 |
CVE-2019-1547 | 2019-09-10 | MEDIUM | 4.7 | Normally in OpenSSL EC groups always have a co-factor present and this is used in side channel resistant code paths. However, in some cases, it is possible to c NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006 · NTAP-20200416-0003 +2 |
CVE-2019-1549 | 2019-09-10 | MEDIUM | 5.3 | OpenSSL 1.1.1 introduced a rewritten random number generator (RNG). This was intended to include protection in the event of a fork() system call in order to ens NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190919-0002 |
CVE-2019-15504 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0002 |
CVE-2019-15505 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0002 |
CVE-2019-1551 | 2019-12-06 | MEDIUM | 5.3 | There is an overflow bug in the x64_64 Montgomery squaring procedure used in exponentiation with 512-bit moduli. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggest NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191210-0001 |
CVE-2019-1552 | 2019-07-30 | LOW | 3.3 | OpenSSL has internal defaults for a directory tree where it can find a configuration file as well as certificates used for verification in TLS. This directory i NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190823-0006 |
CVE-2019-15538 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191004-0001 |
CVE-2019-15587 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191122-0003 |
CVE-2019-1559 | 2019-02-27 | MEDIUM | 5.9 | If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 · NTAP-20190423-0002 +2 |
CVE-2019-15601 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0003 · NTAP-20200127-0002 |
CVE-2019-15604 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200221-0004 |
CVE-2019-15605 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200221-0004 |
CVE-2019-15606 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200221-0004 |
CVE-2019-1563 | 2019-09-10 | LOW | 3.7 | In situations where an attacker receives automated notification of the success or failure of a decryption attempt an attacker, after sending a very large number NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190919-0002 |
Years: 2026 · 2025 · 2024 · 2023 · 2022 · 2021 · 2020 · 2019 · 2018 · 2017 · 2016 · 2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 1999