NetApp Black Box — ONTAP knowledge base

Home / Security / ONTAP CVE Index

ONTAP CVE Index

1669 CVEs referenced by NetApp ONTAP security advisories. CVSS detail is added automatically as NVD records are backfilled; KEV-flagged entries are marked.

Always verify. Severity and CVSS come from the NVD record; NetApp's advisory is authoritative for affected versions and fixes.
Showing 1669 of 1669
CVEPublishedSeverityCVSSSummary / Sources
CVE-1999-0016——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170815-0001
CVE-2002-200012021-11-11HIGH7.5The Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Protocol allows remote attackers (from the client side) to send arbitrary numbers that are actually not public keys, and trigge NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260227-0010
CVE-2003-0028——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150122-0002
CVE-2003-1418——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150209-0001
CVE-2004-1653——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191107-0001
CVE-2004-21312004-01-27——Stack-based buffer overflow in ontape for IBM Informix Dynamic Server (IDS) 9.40.xC3 and earlier allows local users, with DSA privileges, to execute arbitrary c NVD ↗ ·
CVE-2004-25392004-12-31——Unknown vulnerability in Network Appliance NetCache 5.2 and Data ONTAP 6.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (panic and reboot) and possibly NVD ↗ ·
CVE-2005-33272005-10-27——Network Appliance Data ONTAP 7.0 and earlier allows iSCSI Initiators to bypass iSCSI authentication via a modified client that skips the Security (Start) mode, NVD ↗ ·
CVE-2006-35692006-07-13——Unspecified vulnerability in NetApp Data ONTAP 7.0x through 7.0.4P8D9, 7.1x, 7.1.0.1x, and 7.2RC1, RC2, and RC3, as used in IBM N series Filers and other produc NVD ↗ ·
CVE-2008-09602008-06-10——SNMPv3 HMAC verification in (1) Net-SNMP 5.2.x before 5.2.4.1, 5.3.x before 5.3.2.1, and 5.4.x before 5.4.1.1; (2) UCD-SNMP; (3) eCos; (4) Juniper Session and R NVD ↗ ·
CVE-2008-31602008-07-14——Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in IBM Data ONTAP 7.1 before 7.1.3, as used by IBM System Storage N series Filer and IBM System Storage N series Gateway, h NVD ↗ ·
CVE-2008-33492008-07-28——Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in NetApp Data ONTAP, as used on NetApp and IBM eServer platforms, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands, ca NVD ↗ ·
CVE-2009-5155——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190315-0002
CVE-2010-1871——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161017-0001
CVE-2010-3613——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141030-0002
CVE-2011-4461——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190307-0004
CVE-2012-1667——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141030-0003
CVE-2012-4244——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221209-0008
CVE-2012-5615——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141119-0001
CVE-2013-1620——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141028-0001
CVE-2013-1741——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141028-0001
CVE-2013-2566——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150122-0001
CVE-2013-5855——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141028-0001
CVE-2014-0076——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20140609-0004
CVE-2014-0092——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141024-0001
CVE-2014-0160——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20140410-0001
CVE-2014-0224——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141119-0001
CVE-2014-125087——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240208-0009
CVE-2014-2479——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141028-0001
CVE-2014-2480——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141028-0001
CVE-2014-2481——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141028-0001
CVE-2014-2493——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141028-0001
CVE-2014-3470——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20140609-0004
CVE-2014-3505——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141030-0001
CVE-2014-3506——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141030-0001
CVE-2014-3507——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141030-0001
CVE-2014-3508——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141030-0001
CVE-2014-3509——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141030-0001
CVE-2014-3510——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141030-0001
CVE-2014-3511——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141030-0001
CVE-2014-3512——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141030-0001
CVE-2014-3513——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141015-0002
CVE-2014-3566——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141015-0001 · NTAP-20150126-0001
CVE-2014-3567——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141015-0002
CVE-2014-3568——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141015-0002
CVE-2014-3569——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150417-0002
CVE-2014-4201——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141028-0001
CVE-2014-4202——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141028-0001
CVE-2014-4210——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141028-0001
CVE-2014-4211——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141028-0001
CVE-2014-4212——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141028-0001
CVE-2014-4217——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141028-0001
CVE-2014-4222——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141028-0001
CVE-2014-4241——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141028-0001
CVE-2014-4242——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141028-0001
CVE-2014-4249——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141028-0001
CVE-2014-4251——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141028-0001
CVE-2014-4253——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141028-0001
CVE-2014-4254——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141028-0001
CVE-2014-4255——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141028-0001
CVE-2014-4256——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141028-0001
CVE-2014-4257——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141028-0001
CVE-2014-4267——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141028-0001
CVE-2014-4274——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141119-0001
CVE-2014-4287——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141119-0001
CVE-2014-4288——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141023-0001
CVE-2014-4877——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150122-0003
CVE-2014-5139——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141030-0001
CVE-2014-6271——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20140924-0001
CVE-2014-6277——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20140924-0001
CVE-2014-6278——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20140924-0001
CVE-2014-6456——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141023-0001
CVE-2014-6457——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141023-0001
CVE-2014-6458——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141023-0001
CVE-2014-6463——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141119-0001
CVE-2014-6464——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141119-0001
CVE-2014-6466——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141023-0001
CVE-2014-6468——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141023-0001
CVE-2014-6469——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141119-0001
CVE-2014-6474——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141119-0001
CVE-2014-6476——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141023-0001
CVE-2014-6478——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141119-0001
CVE-2014-6484——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141119-0001
CVE-2014-6485——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141023-0001
CVE-2014-6489——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141119-0001
CVE-2014-6491——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141119-0001
CVE-2014-6492——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141023-0001
CVE-2014-6493——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141023-0001
CVE-2014-6494——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141119-0001
CVE-2014-6495——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141119-0001
CVE-2014-6496——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141119-0001
CVE-2014-6500——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141119-0001
CVE-2014-6502——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141023-0001
CVE-2014-6503——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141023-0001
CVE-2014-6504——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141023-0001
CVE-2014-6505——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141119-0001
CVE-2014-6506——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141023-0001
CVE-2014-6507——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141119-0001
CVE-2014-6511——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141023-0001
CVE-2014-6512——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141023-0001
CVE-2014-6513——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141023-0001
CVE-2014-6515——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141023-0001
CVE-2014-6517——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141023-0001
CVE-2014-6519——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141023-0001
CVE-2014-6520——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141119-0001
CVE-2014-6527——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141023-0001
CVE-2014-6530——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141119-0001
CVE-2014-6531——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141023-0001
CVE-2014-6532——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141023-0001
CVE-2014-6549——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150126-0001
CVE-2014-6551——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141119-0001
CVE-2014-6555——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141119-0001
CVE-2014-6558——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141023-0001
CVE-2014-6559——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141119-0001
CVE-2014-6562——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141023-0001
CVE-2014-6564——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20141119-0001
CVE-2014-6568——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150304-0001
CVE-2014-6585——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150126-0001
CVE-2014-6587——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150126-0001
CVE-2014-6591——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150126-0001
CVE-2014-6593——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150126-0001
CVE-2014-6601——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150126-0001
CVE-2014-7169——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20140924-0001
CVE-2014-7186——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20140924-0001
CVE-2014-7187——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20140924-0001
CVE-2014-8176——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150616-0001
CVE-2015-0204——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150417-0001
CVE-2015-0207——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150323-0002
CVE-2015-0208——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150323-0002
CVE-2015-0209——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150323-0002
CVE-2015-0235——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150127-0001
CVE-2015-0285——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150323-0002
CVE-2015-0286——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150323-0002
CVE-2015-0287——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150323-0002
CVE-2015-0288——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150323-0002
CVE-2015-0289——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150323-0002
CVE-2015-0290——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150323-0002
CVE-2015-0291——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150323-0002
CVE-2015-0292——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150323-0002
CVE-2015-0293——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150323-0002
CVE-2015-0374——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150304-0001
CVE-2015-0381——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150304-0001
CVE-2015-0382——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150304-0001
CVE-2015-0383——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150126-0001
CVE-2015-0385——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150304-0001
CVE-2015-0391——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150304-0001
CVE-2015-0395——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150126-0001
CVE-2015-0400——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150126-0001
CVE-2015-0403——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150126-0001
CVE-2015-0405——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150417-0002
CVE-2015-0406——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150126-0001
CVE-2015-0407——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150126-0001
CVE-2015-0408——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150126-0001
CVE-2015-0409——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150304-0001
CVE-2015-0410——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150126-0001
CVE-2015-0411——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150304-0001
CVE-2015-0412——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150126-0001
CVE-2015-0413——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150126-0001
CVE-2015-0421——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150126-0001
CVE-2015-0423——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150417-0002
CVE-2015-0432——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150304-0001
CVE-2015-0433——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150417-0002
CVE-2015-0437——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150126-0001
CVE-2015-0438——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150417-0002
CVE-2015-0439——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150417-0002
CVE-2015-0441——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150417-0002
CVE-2015-0458——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150417-0001
CVE-2015-0459——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150417-0001
CVE-2015-0460——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150417-0001
CVE-2015-0469——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150417-0001
CVE-2015-0470——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150417-0001
CVE-2015-0477——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150417-0001
CVE-2015-0478——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150417-0001
CVE-2015-0480——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150417-0001
CVE-2015-0484——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150417-0001
CVE-2015-0486——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150417-0001
CVE-2015-0488——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150417-0001
CVE-2015-0491——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150417-0001
CVE-2015-0492——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150417-0001
CVE-2015-0498——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150417-0002
CVE-2015-0499——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150417-0002
CVE-2015-0500——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150417-0002
CVE-2015-0501——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150417-0002
CVE-2015-0503——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150417-0002
CVE-2015-0505——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150417-0002
CVE-2015-0506——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150417-0002
CVE-2015-0507——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150417-0002
CVE-2015-0508——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150417-0002
CVE-2015-0511——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150417-0002
CVE-2015-0973——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240719-0005
CVE-2015-1787——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150323-0002
CVE-2015-1788——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150616-0001
CVE-2015-1789——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150616-0001
CVE-2015-1790——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150616-0001
CVE-2015-1791——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150616-0001
CVE-2015-1792——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150616-0001
CVE-2015-1793——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151030-0001
CVE-2015-1794——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151207-0001
CVE-2015-20107——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220616-0001
CVE-2015-2566——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150417-0002
CVE-2015-2567——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150417-0002
CVE-2015-2568——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150417-0002
CVE-2015-2571——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150417-0002
CVE-2015-2573——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150417-0002
CVE-2015-2575——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150417-0003 · NTAP-20150417-0003
CVE-2015-2582——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150716-0001
CVE-2015-2590——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150715-0001
CVE-2015-2596——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150715-0001
CVE-2015-2597——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150715-0001
CVE-2015-2601——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150715-0001
CVE-2015-2611——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150716-0001
CVE-2015-2613——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150715-0001
CVE-2015-2617——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150716-0001
CVE-2015-2619——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150715-0001
CVE-2015-2620——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150716-0001
CVE-2015-2621——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150715-0001
CVE-2015-2625——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150715-0001
CVE-2015-2627——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150715-0001
CVE-2015-2628——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150715-0001
CVE-2015-2632——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150715-0001
CVE-2015-2637——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150715-0001
CVE-2015-2638——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150715-0001
CVE-2015-2639——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150716-0001
CVE-2015-2641——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150716-0001
CVE-2015-2643——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150716-0001
CVE-2015-2648——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150716-0001
CVE-2015-2659——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150715-0001
CVE-2015-2661——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150716-0001
CVE-2015-2664——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150715-0001
CVE-2015-2808——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150122-0001 · NTAP-20150715-0001
CVE-2015-3193——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151207-0001
CVE-2015-3194——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151207-0001 · NTAP-20160421-0001
CVE-2015-3195——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151207-0001
CVE-2015-3196——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151207-0001
CVE-2015-3197——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160201-0001
CVE-2015-4000——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150619-0001 · NTAP-20150616-0001 +1
CVE-2015-4729——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150715-0001
CVE-2015-4730——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151030-0001
CVE-2015-4731——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150715-0001
CVE-2015-4732——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150715-0001
CVE-2015-4733——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150715-0001
CVE-2015-4734——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151028-0001
CVE-2015-4736——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150715-0001
CVE-2015-4737——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150716-0001
CVE-2015-4748——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150715-0001
CVE-2015-4749——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150715-0001
CVE-2015-4752——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150716-0001
CVE-2015-4756——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150716-0001
CVE-2015-4757——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150716-0001
CVE-2015-4760——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150715-0001
CVE-2015-4761——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150716-0001
CVE-2015-4766——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151030-0001
CVE-2015-4767——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150716-0001
CVE-2015-4769——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150716-0001
CVE-2015-4771——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150716-0001
CVE-2015-4772——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150716-0001
CVE-2015-4791——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151030-0001
CVE-2015-4792——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151030-0001
CVE-2015-4800——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151030-0001
CVE-2015-4802——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151030-0001
CVE-2015-4803——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151028-0001
CVE-2015-4805——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151028-0001
CVE-2015-4806——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151028-0001
CVE-2015-4807——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151030-0001
CVE-2015-4810——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151028-0001
CVE-2015-4815——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151030-0001
CVE-2015-4816——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151030-0001
CVE-2015-4819——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151030-0001
CVE-2015-4826——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151030-0001
CVE-2015-4830——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151030-0001
CVE-2015-4833——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151030-0001
CVE-2015-4835——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151028-0001
CVE-2015-4836——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151030-0001
CVE-2015-4840——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151028-0001
CVE-2015-4842——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151028-0001
CVE-2015-4843——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151028-0001
CVE-2015-4844——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151028-0001
CVE-2015-4852——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151123-0001
CVE-2015-4858——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151030-0001
CVE-2015-4860——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151028-0001
CVE-2015-4861——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151030-0001
CVE-2015-4862——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151030-0001
CVE-2015-4864——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151030-0001
CVE-2015-4866——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151030-0001
CVE-2015-4868——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151028-0001
CVE-2015-4870——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151030-0001
CVE-2015-4871——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151028-0001
CVE-2015-4872——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151028-0001
CVE-2015-4879——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151030-0001
CVE-2015-4881——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151028-0001
CVE-2015-4882——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151028-0001
CVE-2015-4883——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151028-0001
CVE-2015-4890——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151030-0001
CVE-2015-4893——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151028-0001
CVE-2015-4895——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151030-0001
CVE-2015-4901——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151028-0001
CVE-2015-4902——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151028-0001
CVE-2015-4903——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151028-0001
CVE-2015-4904——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151030-0001
CVE-2015-4905——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151030-0001
CVE-2015-4906——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151028-0001
CVE-2015-4908——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151028-0001
CVE-2015-4910——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151030-0001
CVE-2015-4911——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151028-0001
CVE-2015-4913——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151030-0001
CVE-2015-4916——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151028-0001
CVE-2015-5300——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171004-0001
CVE-2015-5352——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20181023-0001
CVE-2015-5477——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160114-0001
CVE-2015-5600——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151106-0001
CVE-2015-6563——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180201-0002
CVE-2015-6564——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160330-0001
CVE-2015-6565——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160330-0001
CVE-2015-7547——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160217-0002
CVE-2015-7575——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160225-0001 · NTAP-20160121-0001
CVE-2015-7691——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171004-0001
CVE-2015-7692——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171004-0001
CVE-2015-7701——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171004-0001
CVE-2015-7702——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171004-0001
CVE-2015-7703——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171004-0001
CVE-2015-7704——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171004-0002 · NTAP-20171004-0001
CVE-2015-7705——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171004-0001
CVE-2015-7744——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160121-0002
CVE-2015-77462017-09-01CRITICAL9.8NetApp Data ONTAP before 8.2.4, when operating in 7-Mode, allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and (1) obtain sensitive information from or (2) modi NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151112-0001
CVE-2015-7848——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171004-0001
CVE-2015-7849——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171004-0001
CVE-2015-7850——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171004-0001
CVE-2015-7851——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171004-0001
CVE-2015-7852——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171004-0001
CVE-2015-7853——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171004-0001
CVE-2015-7854——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171004-0001
CVE-2015-7855——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171004-0001
CVE-2015-7871——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171004-0001
CVE-2015-78862016-01-18LOW3.7NetApp Data ONTAP before 8.2.4P1, when 7-Mode and HTTP access are enabled, allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive volume information via unspecified vector NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160114-0002
CVE-2015-7973——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171031-0001
CVE-2015-7974——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171031-0001
CVE-2015-7975——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171031-0001
CVE-2015-7976——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171031-0001
CVE-2015-7977——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171031-0001
CVE-2015-7978——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171031-0001
CVE-2015-7979——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171031-0001
CVE-2015-8000——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160317-0001
CVE-2015-80202017-01-11LOW3.7Clustered Data ONTAP versions 8.0, 8.3.1, and 8.3.2 contain a default privileged account which under certain conditions can be used for unauthorized information NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160802-0001
CVE-2015-8126——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160121-0001
CVE-2015-8138——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171004-0002 · NTAP-20171031-0001
CVE-2015-8158——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171031-0001
CVE-2015-8325——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180628-0001
CVE-2015-8461——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160317-0001
CVE-2015-8545——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20151123-0001
CVE-2015-8704——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160322-0001
CVE-2015-8705——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160322-0001
CVE-2015-8960——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180626-0002
CVE-2016-0402——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160121-0001
CVE-2016-0448——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160121-0001
CVE-2016-0466——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160121-0001
CVE-2016-0475——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160121-0001
CVE-2016-0483——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160121-0001
CVE-2016-0494——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160121-0001
CVE-2016-0502——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160121-0002
CVE-2016-0503——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160121-0002
CVE-2016-0504——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160121-0002
CVE-2016-0505——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160121-0002
CVE-2016-0546——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160121-0002
CVE-2016-0594——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160121-0002
CVE-2016-0595——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160121-0002
CVE-2016-0596——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160121-0002
CVE-2016-0597——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160121-0002
CVE-2016-0598——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160121-0002
CVE-2016-0599——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160121-0002
CVE-2016-0600——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160121-0002
CVE-2016-0601——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160121-0002
CVE-2016-0603——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160217-0001
CVE-2016-0605——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160121-0002
CVE-2016-0606——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160121-0002
CVE-2016-0607——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160121-0002
CVE-2016-0608——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160121-0002
CVE-2016-0609——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160121-0002
CVE-2016-0610——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160121-0002
CVE-2016-0611——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160121-0002
CVE-2016-0616——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160121-0002
CVE-2016-0636——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160328-0001
CVE-2016-0639——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160421-0001
CVE-2016-0640——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160421-0001
CVE-2016-0641——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160421-0001
CVE-2016-0642——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160421-0001
CVE-2016-0643——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160421-0001
CVE-2016-0644——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160421-0001
CVE-2016-0646——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160421-0001
CVE-2016-0647——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160421-0001
CVE-2016-0648——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160421-0001
CVE-2016-0649——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160421-0001
CVE-2016-0650——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160421-0001
CVE-2016-0651——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160421-0001
CVE-2016-0652——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160421-0001
CVE-2016-0653——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160421-0001
CVE-2016-0654——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160421-0001
CVE-2016-0655——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160421-0001
CVE-2016-0656——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160421-0001
CVE-2016-0657——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160421-0001
CVE-2016-0658——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160421-0001
CVE-2016-0659——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160421-0001
CVE-2016-0661——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160421-0001
CVE-2016-0662——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160421-0001
CVE-2016-0663——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160421-0001
CVE-2016-0665——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160421-0001
CVE-2016-0666——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160421-0001
CVE-2016-0667——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160421-0001
CVE-2016-0668——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160421-0001
CVE-2016-0686——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160420-0001
CVE-2016-0687——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160420-0001
CVE-2016-0695——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160420-0001
CVE-2016-0701——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160201-0001
CVE-2016-0702——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160303-0001
CVE-2016-0703——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160303-0001
CVE-2016-0704——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160303-0001
CVE-2016-0705——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160303-0001 · NTAP-20160421-0001
CVE-2016-0728——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160211-0001
CVE-2016-0736——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180423-0001
CVE-2016-0777——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160126-0001
CVE-2016-0778——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160126-0001
CVE-2016-0797——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160303-0001
CVE-2016-0798——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160303-0001
CVE-2016-0799——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160303-0001
CVE-2016-0800——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160301-0001
CVE-2016-10009——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171130-0002
CVE-2016-10010——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171130-0002
CVE-2016-10011——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171130-0002
CVE-2016-10012——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171130-0002
CVE-2016-10158——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180112-0001
CVE-2016-10159——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180112-0001
CVE-2016-10160——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180112-0001
CVE-2016-10161——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180112-0001
CVE-2016-10165——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171019-0001
CVE-2016-102292017-04-04CRITICAL9.8udp.c in the Linux kernel before 4.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via UDP traffic that triggers an unsafe second checksum calculation durin NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250103-0008 · NTAP-20250103-0008
CVE-2016-10397——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180112-0001
CVE-2016-10708——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180423-0003
CVE-2016-1285——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160322-0002
CVE-2016-1286——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160322-0002
CVE-2016-1547——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171004-0002
CVE-2016-1548——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171004-0002
CVE-2016-1549——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171004-0002
CVE-2016-1550——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171004-0002
CVE-2016-1551——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171004-0002
CVE-2016-15632016-04-07MEDIUM6.8NetApp Clustered Data ONTAP 8.3.1 does not properly verify X.509 certificates from TLS servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and ob NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160310-0002
CVE-2016-18952017-09-01MEDIUM6.5NetApp Data ONTAP before 8.2.5 and 8.3.x before 8.3.2P12 allow remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service via vectors related to unsafe user input NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170831-0003
CVE-2016-1907——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160519-0001
CVE-2016-1908——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160519-0001
CVE-2016-2047——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160421-0001
CVE-2016-2088——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160322-0002
CVE-2016-2105——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160504-0001 · NTAP-20160721-0002
CVE-2016-2106——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160504-0001
CVE-2016-2107——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160504-0001
CVE-2016-2108——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160504-0001
CVE-2016-2109——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160504-0001
CVE-2016-2118——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160412-0001
CVE-2016-2161——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180423-0001
CVE-2016-2176——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160504-0001
CVE-2016-2177——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160928-0001
CVE-2016-2178——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160928-0001
CVE-2016-2179——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160928-0001
CVE-2016-2180——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160928-0001
CVE-2016-2181——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160928-0001
CVE-2016-2182——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160928-0001
CVE-2016-2183——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160915-0001 · NTAP-20160928-0001 +1
CVE-2016-2516——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171004-0002
CVE-2016-2517——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171004-0002
CVE-2016-2518——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171004-0002
CVE-2016-2519——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171004-0002
CVE-2016-2776——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160930-0001
CVE-2016-2842——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160321-0001
CVE-2016-2848——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180926-0005 · NTAP-20180926-0002
CVE-2016-30642016-09-01MEDIUM6.5NetApp Clustered Data ONTAP before 8.2.4P4 and 8.3.x before 8.3.2P2 allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive cluster and tenant information via uns NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160830-0002
CVE-2016-3115——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160519-0001
CVE-2016-34002017-07-03HIGH7.5NetApp Data ONTAP 8.1 and 8.2, when operating in 7-Mode, allows man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain sensitive information, gain privileges, or cause a denial NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160412-0001
CVE-2016-3422——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160420-0001
CVE-2016-3424——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160721-0002
CVE-2016-3425——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160420-0001
CVE-2016-3426——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160420-0001
CVE-2016-3427——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160420-0001
CVE-2016-3440——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160721-0002
CVE-2016-3443——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160420-0001
CVE-2016-3449——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160420-0001
CVE-2016-3452——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160721-0002
CVE-2016-3458——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160721-0001
CVE-2016-3459——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160721-0002
CVE-2016-3471——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160721-0002
CVE-2016-3477——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160721-0002
CVE-2016-3485——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160721-0001
CVE-2016-3486——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160721-0002
CVE-2016-3492——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161019-0002
CVE-2016-3495——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161019-0002
CVE-2016-3498——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160721-0001
CVE-2016-3500——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160721-0001
CVE-2016-3501——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160721-0002
CVE-2016-3503——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160721-0001
CVE-2016-3508——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160721-0001
CVE-2016-3511——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160721-0001
CVE-2016-3518——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160721-0002
CVE-2016-3521——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160721-0002
CVE-2016-3550——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160721-0001
CVE-2016-3552——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160721-0001
CVE-2016-3587——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160721-0001
CVE-2016-3588——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160721-0002
CVE-2016-3598——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160721-0001
CVE-2016-3606——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160721-0001
CVE-2016-3610——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160721-0001
CVE-2016-3614——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160721-0002
CVE-2016-3615——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160721-0002
CVE-2016-39972017-07-03HIGH7.5NetApp Clustered Data ONTAP allows man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain sensitive information, gain privileges, or cause a denial of service by leveraging fail NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160412-0001
CVE-2016-3998——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160412-0001
CVE-2016-43412017-02-07HIGH7.5NetApp Clustered Data ONTAP before 8.3.2P7 allows remote attackers to obtain SMB share information via unspecified vectors. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161028-0001
CVE-2016-4953——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160722-0001
CVE-2016-4954——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160722-0001
CVE-2016-4955——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160722-0001
CVE-2016-4956——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160722-0001
CVE-2016-4957——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160722-0001
CVE-2016-5195——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161025-0001
CVE-2016-53742017-03-01HIGH8.8NetApp Data ONTAP 9.0 and 9.1 before 9.1P1 allows remote authenticated users that own SMB-hosted data to bypass intended sharing restrictions by leveraging impr NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170228-0002
CVE-2016-5399——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180112-0001
CVE-2016-5436——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160721-0002
CVE-2016-5437——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160721-0002
CVE-2016-5439——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160721-0002
CVE-2016-5440——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160721-0002
CVE-2016-5441——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160721-0002
CVE-2016-5442——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160721-0002
CVE-2016-5443——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160721-0002
CVE-2016-5444——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160721-0002
CVE-2016-5507——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161019-0002
CVE-2016-5541——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0002
CVE-2016-5542——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161019-0001
CVE-2016-5546——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0001
CVE-2016-5547——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0001
CVE-2016-5548——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0001
CVE-2016-5549——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0001
CVE-2016-5552——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0001
CVE-2016-5554——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161019-0001
CVE-2016-5556——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161019-0001
CVE-2016-5568——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161019-0001
CVE-2016-5573——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161019-0001
CVE-2016-5582——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161019-0001
CVE-2016-5584——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161019-0002
CVE-2016-5597——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161019-0001
CVE-2016-5609——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161019-0002
CVE-2016-5612——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161019-0002
CVE-2016-5616——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161019-0002
CVE-2016-5617——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161019-0002
CVE-2016-5624——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161019-0002
CVE-2016-5625——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161019-0002
CVE-2016-5626——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161019-0002
CVE-2016-5627——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161019-0002
CVE-2016-5628——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161019-0002
CVE-2016-5629——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161019-0002
CVE-2016-5630——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161019-0002
CVE-2016-5631——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161019-0002
CVE-2016-5632——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161019-0002
CVE-2016-5633——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161019-0002
CVE-2016-5634——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161019-0002
CVE-2016-5635——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161019-0002
CVE-2016-5873——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180112-0001
CVE-2016-6210——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190206-0001
CVE-2016-6302——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160928-0001
CVE-2016-6303——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160928-0001
CVE-2016-6304——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160928-0001 · NTAP-20161019-0002
CVE-2016-6305——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160928-0001
CVE-2016-6306——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160928-0001
CVE-2016-6307——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160928-0001
CVE-2016-6308——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160928-0001
CVE-2016-64952017-02-07MEDIUM5.9NetApp Data ONTAP before 8.2.4P5, when operating in 7-Mode, allows remote attackers to obtain information about the volumes configured for HTTP access. NVD ↗ ·
CVE-2016-6515: OpenSSH vulnerability——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171130-0003
CVE-2016-6662——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161019-0002
CVE-2016-66672017-02-07CRITICAL9.8NetApp OnCommand Unified Manager for Clustered Data ONTAP 6.3 through 6.4P1 contain a default privileged account, which allows remote attackers to execute arbit NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161017-0002
CVE-2016-68202017-01-11HIGH7.5MetroCluster Tiebreaker for clustered Data ONTAP in versions before 1.2 discloses sensitive information in cleartext which may be viewed by an unauthenticated u NVD ↗ · NTAP-20160816-0001
CVE-2016-69042017-12-11HIGH8.1Versions of VASA Provider for Clustered Data ONTAP prior to 7.0P1 contain a web server that accepts plain text authentication. This could allow an unauthenticat NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171208-0002
CVE-2016-7055——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170127-0001
CVE-2016-7076——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20181127-0002
CVE-2016-7426——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170310-0002
CVE-2016-7427——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170310-0002
CVE-2016-7428——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170310-0002
CVE-2016-7429——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170310-0002
CVE-2016-7431——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170310-0002
CVE-2016-7433——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170310-0002
CVE-2016-7434——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170310-0002
CVE-2016-7440——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161019-0002
CVE-2016-7478——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180112-0001
CVE-2016-7479——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180112-0001
CVE-2016-7480——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180112-0001
CVE-2016-8106——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190731-0001
CVE-2016-8283——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161019-0002
CVE-2016-8284——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161019-0002
CVE-2016-8286——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161019-0002
CVE-2016-8287——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161019-0002
CVE-2016-8288——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161019-0002
CVE-2016-8289——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161019-0002
CVE-2016-8290——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20161019-0002
CVE-2016-8318——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0002
CVE-2016-8327——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0002
CVE-2016-8328——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0001
CVE-2016-8610——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171130-0001
CVE-2016-8740——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180423-0001
CVE-2016-8743——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180423-0001
CVE-2016-8864——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180926-0005
CVE-2016-9131——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180926-0005
CVE-2016-9147——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180926-0005
CVE-2016-9310——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170310-0002
CVE-2016-9311——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170310-0002
CVE-2016-9312——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170310-0002
CVE-2016-9444——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180926-0005
CVE-2016-9778——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180926-0005
CVE-2016-9841——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171019-0001
CVE-2017-10002532017-10-05HIGH7.8Linux distributions that have not patched their long-term kernels with https://git.kernel.org/linus/a87938b2e246b81b4fb713edb371a9fa3c5c3c86 (committed on April NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260522-0015
CVE-2017-1000364——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170808-0001
CVE-2017-1000365——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170808-0001
CVE-2017-1000366——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170808-0001
CVE-2017-1000367——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170803-0001
CVE-2017-1000368——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170803-0001
CVE-2017-10004052017-11-30HIGH7.0The Linux Kernel versions 2.6.38 through 4.14 have a problematic use of pmd_mkdirty() in the touch_pmd() function inside the THP implementation. touch_pmd() can NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260527-0014
CVE-2017-1000408——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190404-0003
CVE-2017-1000409——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190404-0003
CVE-2017-10053——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170720-0001
CVE-2017-10067——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170720-0001
CVE-2017-10074——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170720-0001
CVE-2017-10078——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170720-0001
CVE-2017-10081——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170720-0001
CVE-2017-10086——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170720-0001
CVE-2017-10087——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170720-0001
CVE-2017-10089——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170720-0001
CVE-2017-10090——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170720-0001
CVE-2017-10096——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170720-0001
CVE-2017-10101——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170720-0001
CVE-2017-10102——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170720-0001
CVE-2017-10104——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170720-0001
CVE-2017-10105——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170720-0001
CVE-2017-10107——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170720-0001
CVE-2017-10108——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170720-0001
CVE-2017-10109——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170720-0001
CVE-2017-10110——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170720-0001
CVE-2017-10111——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170720-0001
CVE-2017-10114——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170720-0001
CVE-2017-10115——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170720-0001
CVE-2017-10116——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170720-0001
CVE-2017-10117——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170720-0001
CVE-2017-10118——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170720-0001
CVE-2017-10121——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170720-0001
CVE-2017-10125——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170720-0001
CVE-2017-10135——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170720-0001
CVE-2017-10145——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170720-0001
CVE-2017-10176——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170720-0001
CVE-2017-10193——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170720-0001
CVE-2017-10198——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170720-0001
CVE-2017-10243——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170720-0001
CVE-2017-10274——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171019-0001
CVE-2017-10281——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171019-0001
CVE-2017-10285——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171019-0001
CVE-2017-10293——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171019-0001
CVE-2017-10295——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171019-0001
CVE-2017-10309——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171019-0001
CVE-2017-10341——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171019-0001
CVE-2017-10342——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171019-0001
CVE-2017-10345——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171019-0001
CVE-2017-10346——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171019-0001
CVE-2017-10347——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171019-0001
CVE-2017-10348——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171019-0001
CVE-2017-10349——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171019-0001
CVE-2017-10350——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171019-0001
CVE-2017-10355——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171019-0001
CVE-2017-10356——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171019-0001
CVE-2017-10357——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171019-0001
CVE-2017-10380——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171019-0001
CVE-2017-10386——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171019-0001
CVE-2017-10388——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171019-0001
CVE-2017-11142——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180112-0001
CVE-2017-11143——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180112-0001
CVE-2017-11144——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180112-0001
CVE-2017-11145——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180112-0001
CVE-2017-11147——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180112-0001
CVE-2017-11362——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180112-0001
CVE-2017-11628——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180112-0001
CVE-2017-124202017-08-18HIGH8.8Heap-based buffer overflow in the SMB implementation in NetApp Clustered Data ONTAP before 8.3.2P8 and 9.0 before P2 allows remote authenticated users to cause NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170814-0001
CVE-2017-124212017-09-01HIGH8.8NetApp Clustered Data ONTAP 8.3.x before 8.3.2P12 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code on the storage controller via unspecified vectors. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170831-0002
CVE-2017-124232017-09-01HIGH7.7NetApp Clustered Data ONTAP 8.3.x before 8.3.2P12 allows remote authenticated users to read data on other Storage Virtual Machines (SVMs) via unspecified vector NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170831-0002
CVE-2017-125882017-08-06CRITICAL9.8The zmq3 input and output modules in rsyslog before 8.28.0 interpreted description fields as format strings, possibly allowing a format string attack with unspe NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241227-0009
CVE-2017-128592017-08-18MEDIUM5.9NetApp Data ONTAP before 8.2.5, when operating in 7-Mode in NFS environments, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via unspecified vectors. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170815-0002
CVE-2017-12932——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180112-0001
CVE-2017-140532017-09-01HIGH7.5NetApp OnCommand Unified Manager for Clustered Data ONTAP before 7.2P1 does not set the secure flag for an unspecified cookie in an HTTPS session, which makes i NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170831-0001
CVE-2017-145832017-12-18MEDIUM6.5NetApp Clustered Data ONTAP versions 9.x prior to 9.1P10 and 9.2P2 are susceptible to a vulnerability which allows an attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171215-0001
CVE-2017-15710——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180601-0004
CVE-2017-15715——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180601-0004
CVE-2017-15906——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180423-0004
CVE-2017-16642——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20181123-0001
CVE-2017-180172018-01-03CRITICAL9.8The tcpmss_mangle_packet function in net/netfilter/xt_TCPMSS.c in the Linux kernel before 4.11, and 4.9.x before 4.9.36, allows remote attackers to cause a deni NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250103-0010
CVE-2017-18258——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0001
CVE-2017-18269——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190401-0001
CVE-2017-3135——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180926-0005
CVE-2017-3136——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180802-0002
CVE-2017-3137——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180802-0002
CVE-2017-3138——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180802-0002
CVE-2017-3140——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180926-0001
CVE-2017-3141——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180926-0001
CVE-2017-3142——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190830-0003
CVE-2017-3143——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190830-0003
CVE-2017-3145——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180117-0003
CVE-2017-3167——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180601-0002
CVE-2017-3169——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180601-0002
CVE-2017-3231——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0001
CVE-2017-3238——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0002
CVE-2017-3241——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0001
CVE-2017-3243——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0002
CVE-2017-3244——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0002
CVE-2017-3251——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0002
CVE-2017-3252——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0001
CVE-2017-3253——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0001
CVE-2017-3256——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0002
CVE-2017-3257——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0002
CVE-2017-3258——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0002
CVE-2017-3259——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0001
CVE-2017-3260——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0001
CVE-2017-3261——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0001
CVE-2017-3262——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0001
CVE-2017-3265——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0002
CVE-2017-3272——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0001
CVE-2017-3273——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0002
CVE-2017-3289——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0001
CVE-2017-3291——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0002
CVE-2017-3302——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170420-0002
CVE-2017-3305——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170420-0002
CVE-2017-3308——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170420-0002
CVE-2017-3309——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170420-0002
CVE-2017-3312——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0002
CVE-2017-3313——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0002
CVE-2017-3317——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0002
CVE-2017-3318——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0002
CVE-2017-3319——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0002
CVE-2017-3320——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0002
CVE-2017-3321——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0002
CVE-2017-3322——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0002
CVE-2017-3323——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170119-0002
CVE-2017-3329——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170420-0002
CVE-2017-3331——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170420-0002
CVE-2017-3450——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170420-0002
CVE-2017-3452——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170420-0002
CVE-2017-3453——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170420-0002
CVE-2017-3454——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170420-0002
CVE-2017-3455——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170420-0002
CVE-2017-3456——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170420-0002
CVE-2017-3457——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170420-0002
CVE-2017-3458——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170420-0002
CVE-2017-3459——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170420-0002
CVE-2017-3460——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170420-0002
CVE-2017-3461——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170420-0002
CVE-2017-3462——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170420-0002
CVE-2017-3463——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170420-0002
CVE-2017-3464——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170420-0002
CVE-2017-3465——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170420-0002
CVE-2017-3467——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170420-0002
CVE-2017-3468——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170420-0002
CVE-2017-3509——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170420-0001
CVE-2017-3511——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170420-0001
CVE-2017-3512——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170420-0001
CVE-2017-3514——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170420-0001
CVE-2017-3526——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170420-0001
CVE-2017-3533——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170420-0001
CVE-2017-3539——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170420-0001
CVE-2017-3544——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170420-0001
CVE-2017-3599——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170420-0002
CVE-2017-3600——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170420-0002
CVE-2017-3730——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170127-0001
CVE-2017-3731——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170127-0001
CVE-2017-3732——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170127-0001
CVE-2017-3735——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170927-0001
CVE-2017-3736——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171107-0002
CVE-2017-3737——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171208-0001
CVE-2017-3738——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20171208-0001
CVE-2017-5130——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0001
CVE-2017-52012017-11-10MEDIUM5.7NetApp Clustered Data ONTAP before 8.3.2P8 and 9.0 before P2 allow remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive cluster and tenant information via unspecified NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170809-0001
CVE-2017-5340——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180112-0001
CVE-2017-59882017-04-10HIGH7.5NetApp Clustered Data ONTAP 8.1 through 9.1P1, when NFS or SMB is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via unspecified vectors. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170331-0001
CVE-2017-59952017-03-01HIGH7.5The NetApp ONTAP Select Deploy administration utility 2.0 through 2.2.1 might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170228-0001
CVE-2017-7272——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180112-0001
CVE-2017-73452017-04-10MEDIUM5.3NetApp OnCommand Performance Manager and OnCommand Unified Manager for Clustered Data ONTAP before 7.1P1 improperly bind the Java Management Extension Remote Me NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170331-0002
CVE-2017-7659——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180601-0002
CVE-2017-7668——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180601-0002
CVE-2017-7679——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180601-0002
CVE-2017-7890——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180112-0001
CVE-2017-79472017-07-17MEDIUM6.5NetApp Clustered Data ONTAP before 8.3.2P11, 9.0 before P4, and 9.1 before P5 allow attackers to obtain sensitive password information by leveraging logging of NVD ↗ · NTAP-20170630-0001
CVE-2017-8779——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180109-0001
CVE-2017-89232017-05-12CRITICAL9.8The zend_string_extend function in Zend/zend_string.h in PHP through 7.1.5 does not prevent changes to string objects that result in a negative length, which al NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241227-0007
CVE-2017-9119——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180112-0001
CVE-2017-92172017-05-24HIGH7.5systemd-resolved through 233 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via a crafted DNS response with an empty question section. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241213-0003
CVE-2018-0732——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20181105-0001
CVE-2018-0733——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180330-0002
CVE-2018-0734——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20181105-0002
CVE-2018-0735——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20181105-0002
CVE-2018-0737——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180726-0003
CVE-2018-0739——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180330-0002
CVE-2018-1000001——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190404-0003
CVE-2018-1000656——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190221-0001
CVE-2018-11236——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190401-0001
CVE-2018-11237——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190401-0001
CVE-2018-12015——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180927-0001
CVE-2018-1283——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180601-0004
CVE-2018-1301——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180601-0004
CVE-2018-1302——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180601-0004
CVE-2018-1303——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180601-0004
CVE-2018-1312——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180601-0004
CVE-2018-14404——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0002
CVE-2018-15473——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20181101-0001
CVE-2018-15919——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20181221-0001
CVE-2018-16890——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190315-0001
CVE-2018-18065——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20181107-0001
CVE-2018-18066——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20181107-0001
CVE-2018-19591——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190321-0003
CVE-2018-19931——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190221-0004
CVE-2018-19932——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190221-0004
CVE-2018-20002——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190221-0004
CVE-2018-20685——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190215-0001
CVE-2018-20796——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190315-0002
CVE-2018-20836——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0003
CVE-2018-20843——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190703-0001
CVE-2018-25009——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211104-0004
CVE-2018-25010——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211112-0001
CVE-2018-25011——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211104-0004
CVE-2018-25012——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211112-0001
CVE-2018-25013——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211112-0001
CVE-2018-25014——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211104-0004
CVE-2018-25032——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220526-0009
CVE-2018-2579——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180117-0001
CVE-2018-2581——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180117-0001
CVE-2018-2582——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180117-0001
CVE-2018-2588——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180117-0001
CVE-2018-2599——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180117-0001
CVE-2018-2602——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180117-0001
CVE-2018-2603——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180117-0001
CVE-2018-2618——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180117-0001
CVE-2018-2627——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180117-0001
CVE-2018-2629——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180117-0001
CVE-2018-2633——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180117-0001
CVE-2018-2634——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180117-0001
CVE-2018-2637——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180117-0001
CVE-2018-2638——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180117-0001
CVE-2018-2639——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180117-0001
CVE-2018-2641——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180117-0001
CVE-2018-2657——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180117-0001
CVE-2018-2663——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180117-0001
CVE-2018-2675——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180117-0001
CVE-2018-2677——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180117-0001
CVE-2018-2678——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180117-0001
CVE-2018-2783——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180419-0001
CVE-2018-2790——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180419-0001
CVE-2018-2794——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180419-0001
CVE-2018-2795——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180419-0001
CVE-2018-2796——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180419-0001
CVE-2018-2797——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180419-0001
CVE-2018-2798——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180419-0001
CVE-2018-2799——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180419-0001
CVE-2018-2800——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180419-0001
CVE-2018-2811——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180419-0001
CVE-2018-2814——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180419-0001
CVE-2018-2815——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180419-0001
CVE-2018-2825——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180419-0001
CVE-2018-2826——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180419-0001
CVE-2018-2938——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180726-0001
CVE-2018-2940——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180726-0001
CVE-2018-2941——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180726-0001
CVE-2018-2942——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180726-0001
CVE-2018-2952——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180726-0001
CVE-2018-2964——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180726-0001
CVE-2018-2972——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180726-0001
CVE-2018-2973——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180726-0001
CVE-2018-3665——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20181016-0001
CVE-2018-5390——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180815-0003
CVE-2018-5391——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20181003-0002
CVE-2018-54902018-08-03HIGH8.8Read-Only export policy rules are not correctly enforced in Clustered Data ONTAP 8.3 Release Candidate versions and therefore may allow more than "read-only" ac NVD ↗ · NTAP-20150324-0001
CVE-2018-54962018-12-04MEDIUM4.4Data ONTAP operating in 7-Mode versions prior to 8.2.5P2 are susceptible to a vulnerability which discloses sensitive information to an unauthorized user. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20181204-0001
CVE-2018-54972019-01-24MEDIUM4.4Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.1P16, 9.3P10 and 9.4P5 are susceptible to a vulnerability which discloses sensitive information to an unauthorized user NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190109-0001
CVE-2018-54982019-02-01MEDIUM4.4Clustered Data ONTAP versions 9.0 through 9.4 are susceptible to a vulnerability which allows remote authenticated attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190115-0001
CVE-2018-5734——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180926-0005
CVE-2018-5736——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180926-0004
CVE-2018-5737——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180926-0004
CVE-2018-5738——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190830-0002
CVE-2018-5740——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180926-0003
CVE-2018-6485——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190404-0003
CVE-2018-6551——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190404-0003
CVE-2018-6922——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20180815-0002
CVE-2018-77382018-03-07HIGH7.8In util-linux before 2.32-rc1, bash-completion/umount allows local users to gain privileges by embedding shell commands in a mountpoint name, which is mishandle NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241213-0002
CVE-2019-0220——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190625-0007
CVE-2019-10081——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0003
CVE-2019-10082——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0003
CVE-2019-10092——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0003
CVE-2019-10097——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0003
CVE-2019-10098——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0003
CVE-2019-10241——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190509-0003
CVE-2019-10246——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190509-0003
CVE-2019-10247——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190509-0003
CVE-2019-1125——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190809-0002
CVE-2019-11477——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190625-0001
CVE-2019-11478——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190625-0001
CVE-2019-11479——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190625-0001
CVE-2019-11486——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190517-0005
CVE-2019-11487——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190517-0005
CVE-2019-11810——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0003
CVE-2019-11811——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0003
CVE-2019-11815——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0003
CVE-2019-13012——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190806-0003
CVE-2019-13115——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190806-0002
CVE-2019-13117——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190806-0004
CVE-2019-13118——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190806-0004
CVE-2019-14870——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230216-0008
CVE-2019-1547——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190919-0002
CVE-2019-1549——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190919-0002
CVE-2019-1551——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191210-0001
CVE-2019-1552——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190823-0006
CVE-2019-1559——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190301-0001
CVE-2019-1563——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190919-0002
CVE-2019-15874——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200511-0002
CVE-2019-15876——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200413-0001
CVE-2019-15877——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200413-0001
CVE-2019-15903——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190926-0004
CVE-2019-16168——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190926-0003
CVE-2019-172722019-11-21HIGH7.2All versions of ONTAP Select Deploy administration utility are susceptible to a vulnerability which when successfully exploited could allow an administrative us NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191121-0002
CVE-2019-17274——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200226-0001
CVE-2019-17498——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220909-0004
CVE-2019-175462019-10-14HIGH8.8tif_getimage.c in LibTIFF through 4.0.10, as used in GDAL through 3.0.1 and other products, has an integer overflow that potentially causes a heap-based buffer NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241220-0007
CVE-2019-18197——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191031-0004
CVE-2019-19317——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191223-0001
CVE-2019-19603——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191223-0001
CVE-2019-19645——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191223-0001
CVE-2019-19646——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191223-0001
CVE-2019-19956——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200114-0002
CVE-2019-20388——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200702-0005
CVE-2019-20907——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200731-0002
CVE-2019-25013——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210205-0004
CVE-2019-3822——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190315-0001
CVE-2019-3823——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190315-0001
CVE-2019-3829——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190619-0004
CVE-2019-3855——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190327-0005
CVE-2019-3856——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190327-0005
CVE-2019-3857——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190327-0005
CVE-2019-3858——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190327-0005
CVE-2019-3859——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190327-0005
CVE-2019-3860——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190327-0005
CVE-2019-3861——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190327-0005
CVE-2019-3862——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190327-0005
CVE-2019-3863——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190327-0005
CVE-2019-3882——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190517-0005
CVE-2019-3900——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190517-0005
CVE-2019-3901——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190517-0005
CVE-2019-5490——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190305-0001
CVE-2019-54912019-02-27HIGH7.5Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.1P15 and 9.3 prior to 9.3P7 are susceptible to a vulnerability which discloses sensitive information to an unauthentica NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190227-0001
CVE-2019-54932019-08-02HIGH7.5Data ONTAP operating in 7-Mode versions prior to 8.2.5P3 are susceptible to a vulnerability which discloses information to an unauthenticated attacker. A succes NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190801-0002
CVE-2019-5497——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190627-0001
CVE-2019-55012019-08-02HIGH7.5Data ONTAP operating in 7-Mode versions prior to 8.2.5P3 may disclose sensitive LDAP account information to unauthenticated remote attackers. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190801-0001
CVE-2019-55022019-08-05CRITICAL9.1SMB in Data ONTAP operating in 7-Mode versions prior to 8.2.5P3 has weak cryptography which when exploited could lead to information disclosure or addition or m NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190802-0002
CVE-2019-55042019-09-24CRITICAL9.8ONTAP Select Deploy administration utility versions 2.12 & 2.12.1 ship with an HTTP service bound to the network allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to pe NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190923-0001
CVE-2019-55052019-09-24CRITICAL9.8ONTAP Select Deploy administration utility versions 2.2 through 2.12.1 transmit credentials in plaintext. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190923-0002
CVE-2019-55062019-10-09MEDIUM5.9Clustered Data ONTAP versions 9.0 and higher do not enforce hostname verification under certain circumstances making them susceptible to impersonation via man-i NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191009-0003
CVE-2019-55082019-10-25HIGH7.5Clustered Data ONTAP versions 9.2 through 9.4 are susceptible to a vulnerability which allows an attacker to use l2ping to cause a Denial of Service (DoS). NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191024-0001
CVE-2019-55092019-11-21CRITICAL9.8ONTAP Select Deploy administration utility versions 2.11.2 through 2.12.2 are susceptible to a code injection vulnerability which when successfully exploited co NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191121-0001
CVE-2019-5608——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190910-0002
CVE-2019-5609——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190910-0002
CVE-2019-5610——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190910-0002
CVE-2019-5611——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190910-0002
CVE-2019-5612——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190910-0002
CVE-2019-5614——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200511-0002
CVE-2019-5953——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190509-0001
CVE-2019-6109——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190213-0001
CVE-2019-6110——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190213-0001
CVE-2019-6111——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190213-0001
CVE-2019-8460——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0001
CVE-2019-8936——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190503-0001
CVE-2019-9169——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190315-0002
CVE-2020-0587——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201113-0001
CVE-2020-0588——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201113-0001
CVE-2020-0590——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201113-0001
CVE-2020-0591——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201113-0001
CVE-2020-0592——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201113-0001
CVE-2020-0593——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201113-0001
CVE-2020-11655——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0001
CVE-2020-11656——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0001
CVE-2020-11868——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200424-0002
CVE-2020-13434——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200528-0004
CVE-2020-13435——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200528-0004
CVE-2020-13817——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200625-0004
CVE-2020-13871——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200619-0002
CVE-2020-13954——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0010
CVE-2020-14145——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200709-0004
CVE-2020-14155——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0010
CVE-2020-14301——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210629-0007
CVE-2020-14372——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210416-0004
CVE-2020-159992020-11-03CRITICAL9.6Heap buffer overflow in Freetype in Google Chrome prior to 86.0.4240.111 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML pag NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240812-0001
CVE-2020-16166——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200814-0004
CVE-2020-16590——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210115-0003
CVE-2020-16591——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210115-0003
CVE-2020-16592——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210115-0003
CVE-2020-16593——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210122-0003
CVE-2020-16598——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210115-0003
CVE-2020-16599——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210122-0003
CVE-2020-19143——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211004-0005
CVE-2020-19144——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211004-0005
CVE-2020-1968——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200911-0004
CVE-2020-1971——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201218-0005
CVE-2020-21490——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230929-0007
CVE-2020-24718——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201016-0002
CVE-2020-24977——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200924-0001
CVE-2020-25632——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220325-0001
CVE-2020-25647——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220325-0001
CVE-2020-27216——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201123-0005
CVE-2020-27618——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210401-0006
CVE-2020-27749——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220325-0001
CVE-2020-27779——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220325-0001
CVE-2020-35342——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231006-0009
CVE-2020-35448——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210129-0008
CVE-2020-35493——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210212-0007
CVE-2020-35494——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210212-0007
CVE-2020-35495——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210212-0007
CVE-2020-35496——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210212-0007
CVE-2020-35507——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210212-0007
CVE-2020-35521——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210521-0009
CVE-2020-35522——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210521-0009
CVE-2020-35523——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210521-0009
CVE-2020-35524——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210521-0009
CVE-2020-35525——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230706-0007
CVE-2020-35527——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221111-0007
CVE-2020-36328——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211112-0001
CVE-2020-36329——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211112-0001
CVE-2020-36330——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211104-0004
CVE-2020-36331——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211112-0001
CVE-2020-36332——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211104-0004
CVE-2020-36516——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220331-0003
CVE-2020-7071——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210312-0005
CVE-2020-7451——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200413-0001
CVE-2020-7452——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200413-0001
CVE-2020-7453——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200413-0001
CVE-2020-7456——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200625-0005
CVE-2020-7461——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201016-0002
CVE-2020-7462——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201016-0002
CVE-2020-7463——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201016-0002
CVE-2020-7464——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201016-0002
CVE-2020-7467——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201016-0002
CVE-2020-7468——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201016-0002
CVE-2020-7469——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210720-0001
CVE-2020-7595——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200702-0005
CVE-2020-8169——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200911-0002
CVE-2020-8231——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200911-0003
CVE-2020-8284——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210122-0007
CVE-2020-8285——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210122-0007
CVE-2020-8286——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210122-0007
CVE-2020-8492——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200221-0001
CVE-2020-85762020-09-02MEDIUM5.4Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.3P19, 9.5P14, 9.6P9 and 9.7 are susceptible to a vulnerability which when successfully exploited could lead to addition NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200902-0001
CVE-2020-85782021-02-08LOW3.3Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.3P20 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow an attacker to discover node names via AutoSupport bundles ev NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210208-0002 · NTAP-20210208-0003
CVE-2020-85792020-10-27HIGH7.5Clustered Data ONTAP versions 9.7 through 9.7P7 are susceptible to a vulnerability which allows an attacker with access to an intercluster LIF to cause a Denial NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201026-0001
CVE-2020-85812021-01-19MEDIUM6.5Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.3P20 and 9.5 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow an authenticated but unauthorized attacker to overwri NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210119-0001
CVE-2020-85882021-02-03LOW3.5Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.3P20 and 9.5P15 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow unauthorized tenant users to discover the existenc NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210201-0001
CVE-2020-85892021-02-03LOW3.5Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.3P20 and 9.5P15 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow unauthorized tenant users to discover the names of NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210201-0002
CVE-2020-85902021-02-08LOW3.3Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.1P18 and 9.3P12 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow an attacker to discover node names via AutoSupport NVD ↗ ·
CVE-2020-8616——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200522-0002
CVE-2020-8617——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200522-0002
CVE-2020-8696——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201113-0006
CVE-2020-8698——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201113-0006
CVE-2020-8705——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201113-0004
CVE-2020-8744——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201113-0004
CVE-2020-8755——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201113-0004
CVE-2021-20197——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210528-0009
CVE-2021-20225——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220325-0001
CVE-2021-20233——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220325-0001
CVE-2021-20284——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210521-0010
CVE-2021-20305——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0002
CVE-2021-21702——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210312-0005
CVE-2021-21703——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211118-0003
CVE-2021-21704——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211029-0006
CVE-2021-21705——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211029-0006
CVE-2021-21707——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211223-0005
CVE-2021-22060——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220131-0001
CVE-2021-22096——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211125-0005
CVE-2021-22922——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210902-0003
CVE-2021-22923——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210902-0003
CVE-2021-22924——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210902-0003
CVE-2021-22925——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210902-0003
CVE-2021-22926——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210902-0003
CVE-2021-22945——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211029-0003
CVE-2021-22946——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211029-0003
CVE-2021-22947——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211029-0003
CVE-2021-23017——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210708-0006
CVE-2021-23336——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210326-0004
CVE-2021-23839——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0009
CVE-2021-23840——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0009
CVE-2021-23841——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0009
CVE-2021-25217——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220325-0011
CVE-2021-269882021-03-04LOW3.5Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.3P21, 9.5P16, 9.6P12, 9.7P8 and 9.8 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow unauthorized tenant users to d NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210303-0001
CVE-2021-269892021-03-04MEDIUM6.5Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.3P21, 9.5P16, 9.6P12, 9.7P9 and 9.8 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow a remote authenticated attacke NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210303-0002
CVE-2021-269942021-06-04MEDIUM6.5Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.7P13 and 9.8P3 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow single workloads to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210601-0001
CVE-2021-270012021-10-19MEDIUM5.5Clustered Data ONTAP versions 9.x prior to 9.5P18, 9.6P16, 9.7P16, 9.8P7 and 9.9.1P2 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow an authenticated privi NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211018-0001
CVE-2021-270032021-10-12MEDIUM4.7Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.5P18, 9.6P15, 9.7P14, 9.8P5 and 9.9.1 are missing an X-Frame-Options header which could allow a clickjacking attack. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211012-0001
CVE-2021-270052021-11-01HIGH7.5Clustered Data ONTAP versions 9.6 and higher prior to 9.6P16, 9.7P16, 9.8P7 and 9.9.1P3 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow a remote attacker t NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211029-0002
CVE-2021-28163——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210611-0006
CVE-2021-28164——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210611-0006
CVE-2021-28165——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210611-0006
CVE-2021-29921——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210622-0003
CVE-2021-3156——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210128-0002
CVE-2021-3177——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210226-0003
CVE-2021-31879——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210618-0002
CVE-2021-3326——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210304-0007
CVE-2021-3426——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210629-0003
CVE-2021-3449——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210326-0006
CVE-2021-3450——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210326-0006
CVE-2021-34798——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211008-0004
CVE-2021-3516——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210716-0005
CVE-2021-3517——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210625-0002
CVE-2021-3518——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210625-0002
CVE-2021-3520——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211104-0005
CVE-2021-3530——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210716-0006
CVE-2021-3537——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210625-0002
CVE-2021-3541——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210805-0007
CVE-2021-35492021-05-26HIGH7.1An out of bounds flaw was found in GNU binutils objdump utility version 2.36. An attacker could use this flaw and pass a large section to avr_elf32_load_records NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250228-0005
CVE-2021-3559——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210706-0006
CVE-2021-3580——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211104-0006
CVE-2021-35942——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210827-0005
CVE-2021-36160——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211008-0004
CVE-2021-3631——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220331-0010
CVE-2021-3667——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220331-0005
CVE-2021-3671——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230216-0008
CVE-2021-36770——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210909-0003
CVE-2021-3711——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210827-0010
CVE-2021-3712——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210827-0010
CVE-2021-3733——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220407-0001
CVE-2021-3737——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220407-0009
CVE-2021-37600——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210902-0002
CVE-2021-3770——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221124-0003
CVE-2021-3778——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221118-0003
CVE-2021-3796——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221118-0004
CVE-2021-39275——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211008-0004
CVE-2021-3975——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221201-0002
CVE-2021-3998——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221020-0003
CVE-2021-3999——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221104-0001
CVE-2021-40438——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211008-0004
CVE-2021-4044——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211229-0003
CVE-2021-4147——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220513-0004
CVE-2021-4160——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220204-0005
CVE-2021-41617——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211014-0004
CVE-2021-4189——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221104-0004
CVE-2021-44228——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211210-0007
CVE-2021-44758——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230216-0008
CVE-2021-45046——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211215-0001
CVE-2021-45078——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220107-0002
CVE-2021-45105——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211218-0001
CVE-2021-45346——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220303-0001
CVE-2021-46143——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0006
CVE-2021-471792024-03-25HIGH7.5In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: NFSv4: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_return() Commit de144ff423 NVD ↗ ·
CVE-2022-0391——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220225-0009
CVE-2022-0561——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220318-0001
CVE-2022-0562——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220318-0001
CVE-2022-0563——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220331-0002
CVE-2022-0778——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220321-0002
CVE-2022-0897——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220519-0002
CVE-2022-0907——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220506-0002
CVE-2022-0908——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220506-0002
CVE-2022-0909——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220506-0002
CVE-2022-0924——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220506-0002
CVE-2022-1210——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220513-0005
CVE-2022-1292——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220602-0009
CVE-2022-13042022-04-14HIGH7.8An out-of-bounds read/write vulnerability was found in e2fsprogs 1.46.5. This issue leads to a segmentation fault and possibly arbitrary code execution via a sp NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241122-0010
CVE-2022-1343——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220602-0009
CVE-2022-1354——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221014-0007
CVE-2022-1355——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221014-0007
CVE-2022-1434——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220602-0009
CVE-2022-1473——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220602-0009
CVE-2022-1622——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220616-0005
CVE-2022-1623——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220616-0005
CVE-2022-1664——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221007-0002
CVE-2022-1678——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220715-0001
CVE-2022-2068——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220707-0008
CVE-2022-2097——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220715-0011
CVE-2022-22576——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220609-0008
CVE-2022-22822——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220131-0004
CVE-2022-22823——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220131-0004
CVE-2022-22824——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220131-0004
CVE-2022-22825——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220131-0004
CVE-2022-22826——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220131-0004
CVE-2022-22827——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220131-0004
CVE-2022-22844——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220311-0002
CVE-2022-22950——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220401-0001
CVE-2022-22968——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220602-0004
CVE-2022-23093——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221209-0009
CVE-2022-232412022-10-19HIGH8.1Clustered Data ONTAP versions 9.11.1 through 9.11.1P2 with SnapLock configured FlexGroups are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow an authenticated NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221017-0001
CVE-2022-23308——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220331-0008
CVE-2022-23852——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220217-0001
CVE-2022-23990——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220204-0006
CVE-2022-24407——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221007-0003
CVE-2022-24963——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230908-0008
CVE-2022-25147——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240315-0001
CVE-2022-25235——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220303-0008
CVE-2022-25236——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220303-0008
CVE-2022-25313——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220303-0008
CVE-2022-25314——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220303-0008
CVE-2022-25315——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220303-0008
CVE-2022-25844——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220629-0009
CVE-2022-26377——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220624-0005
CVE-2022-26488——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220419-0005
CVE-2022-27774——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220609-0008
CVE-2022-27775——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220609-0008
CVE-2022-27776——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220609-0008
CVE-2022-27778——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220609-0009
CVE-2022-27779——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220609-0009
CVE-2022-27780——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220609-0009
CVE-2022-27781——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220609-0009
CVE-2022-27782——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220609-0009
CVE-2022-28330——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220624-0005
CVE-2022-28614——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220624-0005
CVE-2022-28615——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220624-0005
CVE-2022-29404——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220624-0005
CVE-2022-2953——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221014-0008
CVE-2022-29824——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220715-0006
CVE-2022-29901——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221007-0007
CVE-2022-30115——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220609-0009
CVE-2022-30522——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220624-0005
CVE-2022-30556——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220624-0005
CVE-2022-3080——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0002
CVE-2022-31676——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221017-0003
CVE-2022-31813——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220624-0005
CVE-2022-3219——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230324-0001
CVE-2022-32205——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220915-0003
CVE-2022-32206——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220915-0003
CVE-2022-32207——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220915-0003
CVE-2022-32208——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220915-0003
CVE-2022-32221——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230110-0006
CVE-2022-3437——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230216-0008
CVE-2022-34526——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220930-0002
CVE-2022-34903——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220826-0005
CVE-2022-35202022-12-02CRITICAL9.8Heap-based Buffer Overflow in GitHub repository vim/vim prior to 9.0.0765. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241115-0010
CVE-2022-35205——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231006-0010
CVE-2022-35252——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220930-0005
CVE-2022-35260——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230110-0006
CVE-2022-35737——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220915-0009
CVE-2022-3602——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221102-0001
CVE-2022-37434——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220901-0005
CVE-2022-3786——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221102-0001
CVE-2022-39046——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221104-0002 · NTAP-20221104-0002
CVE-2022-3996——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230203-0003
CVE-2022-40303——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221209-0003
CVE-2022-40304——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221209-0003
CVE-2022-40674——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0008
CVE-2022-407352022-11-14HIGH7.5The Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Protocol allows use of long exponents that arguably make certain calculations unnecessarily expensive, because the 1996 van Oor NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260227-0008
CVE-2022-40897——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230214-0001
CVE-2022-414092023-07-18HIGH7.5Integer overflow vulnerability in pcre2test before 10.41 allows attackers to cause a denial of service or other unspecified impacts via negative input. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260320-0014
CVE-2022-41916——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230216-0008
CVE-2022-4203——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230214-0011 · NTAP-20230214-0011
CVE-2022-42898——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230223-0001 · NTAP-20230216-0008
CVE-2022-42915——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221209-0010
CVE-2022-42916——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221209-0010
CVE-2022-4292——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230113-0005
CVE-2022-4304——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230214-0011 · NTAP-20230214-0011
CVE-2022-43551——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230214-0002
CVE-2022-43552——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230214-0002
CVE-2022-43680——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221118-0007
CVE-2022-4415——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230216-0010
CVE-2022-4450——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230214-0011 · NTAP-20230214-0011
CVE-2022-44640——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230216-0008
CVE-2022-45061——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221209-0007
CVE-2022-45703——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231006-0003
CVE-2022-48063——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231006-0008
CVE-2022-48064——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231006-0008
CVE-2022-48065——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231006-0008
CVE-2022-48560——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230929-0008
CVE-2023-0215——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230214-0011 · NTAP-20230214-0011
CVE-2023-0216——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230214-0011 · NTAP-20230214-0011
CVE-2023-0217——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230214-0011 · NTAP-20230214-0011
CVE-2023-0286——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230214-0011 · NTAP-20230214-0011
CVE-2023-0361——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230324-0005
CVE-2023-0401——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230214-0011 · NTAP-20230214-0011
CVE-2023-0464——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230406-0006
CVE-2023-0465——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230414-0001
CVE-2023-0466——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230414-0001
CVE-2023-0568——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230517-0001
CVE-2023-0662——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230517-0001
CVE-2023-11922023-11-01MEDIUM6.5A use-after-free flaw was found in smb2_is_status_io_timeout() in CIFS in the Linux Kernel. After CIFS transfers response data to a system call, there are still NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250613-0012
CVE-2023-2002——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240202-0004
CVE-2023-20900——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231013-0002
CVE-2023-23914——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230309-0006
CVE-2023-23915——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230309-0006
CVE-2023-23916——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230309-0006
CVE-2023-25136——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230309-0003
CVE-2023-25584——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231103-0002
CVE-2023-25585——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231103-0003
CVE-2023-25586——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231103-0003
CVE-2023-25588——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231103-0003
CVE-2023-25690——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230316-0007
CVE-2023-2650——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230703-0001 · NTAP-20230703-0001
CVE-2023-26604——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230505-0009
CVE-2023-26965——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230706-0009
CVE-2023-2700——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230706-0001
CVE-2023-27043——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230601-0003
CVE-2023-273142023-10-12HIGH7.5ONTAP 9 versions prior to 9.8P19, 9.9.1P16, 9.10.1P12, 9.11.1P8, 9.12.1P2 and 9.13.1 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow a remote unauthenticat NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231009-0001
CVE-2023-273172023-12-15MEDIUM4.3ONTAP 9 versions 9.12.1P8, 9.13.1P4, and 9.13.1P5 are susceptible to a vulnerability which will cause all SAS-attached FIPS 140-2 drives to become unlocked afte NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231215-0001
CVE-2023-273192023-12-21MEDIUM5.3ONTAP Mediator versions prior to 1.7 are susceptible to a vulnerability that can allow an unauthenticated attacker to enumerate URLs via REST API. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231221-0011
CVE-2023-27522——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230316-0007
CVE-2023-27533——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230420-0011
CVE-2023-27535——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230420-0010
CVE-2023-27536——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230420-0010
CVE-2023-27537——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230420-0010
CVE-2023-27538——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230420-0010
CVE-2023-28319——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230609-0009
CVE-2023-28320——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230609-0009
CVE-2023-28321——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230609-0009
CVE-2023-28322——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230609-0009
CVE-2023-28484——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230601-0006
CVE-2023-28656——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230609-0006
CVE-2023-28724——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230609-0006
CVE-2023-288402023-04-04HIGH7.5Moby is an open source container framework developed by Docker Inc. that is distributed as Docker, Mirantis Container Runtime, and various other downstream proj NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260410-0004
CVE-2023-2908——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230731-0004
CVE-2023-29469——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230601-0006
CVE-2023-2953——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230703-0005
CVE-2023-2975——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230725-0004
CVE-2023-30861——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230818-0006
CVE-2023-3107——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230804-0001
CVE-2023-314862023-04-29HIGH8.1HTTP::Tiny before 0.083, a Perl core module since 5.13.9 and available standalone on CPAN, has an insecure default TLS configuration where users must opt in to NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241129-0011
CVE-2023-32067——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240605-0004
CVE-2023-322532025-08-02MEDIUM5.9A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's ksmbd component. A deadlock is triggered by sending multiple concurrent session setup requests, possibly leading to a den NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260206-0002 · NTAP-20260206-0002
CVE-2023-3446——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230803-0011
CVE-2023-34969——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231208-0007
CVE-2023-36054——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230908-0004
CVE-2023-379202023-07-25HIGH7.5Certifi is a curated collection of Root Certificates for validating the trustworthiness of SSL certificates while verifying the identity of TLS hosts. Certifi p NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240912-0002
CVE-2023-38039——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231013-0005
CVE-2023-3817——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230818-0014
CVE-2023-38408——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230803-0010
CVE-2023-384292023-07-18CRITICAL9.8An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel before 6.3.4. fs/ksmbd/connection.c in ksmbd has an off-by-one error in memory allocation (because of ksmbd_smb2_che NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250103-0009 · NTAP-20250103-0009
CVE-2023-38545——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231011-0001
CVE-2023-38546——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231011-0001
CVE-2023-38709——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240415-0013
CVE-2023-396152023-08-29MEDIUM6.5Xmlsoft Libxml2 v2.11.0 was discovered to contain an out-of-bounds read via the xmlSAX2StartElement() function at /libxml2/SAX2.c. This vulnerability allows att NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250801-0009 · NTAP-20250801-0009
CVE-2023-40217——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231006-0014
CVE-2023-41080——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230921-0006 · NTAP-20230921-0006
CVE-2023-42372023-10-04HIGH7.3A flaw was found in the Ansible Automation Platform. When creating a new keypair, the ec2_key module prints out the private key directly to the standard output. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241025-0002
CVE-2023-42795——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231103-0007 · NTAP-20231103-0007
CVE-2023-438042023-10-04MEDIUM5.9urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. urllib3 doesn't treat the `Cookie` HTTP header special or provide any helpers for managing cookies ov NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241213-0007
CVE-2023-4408——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240426-0001
CVE-2023-44466——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231116-0003
CVE-2023-45287——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240112-0005
CVE-2023-453222023-10-06MEDIUM6.5libxml2 through 2.11.5 has a use-after-free that can only occur after a certain memory allocation fails. This occurs in xmlUnlinkNode in tree.c. NOTE: the vendo NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250919-0003
CVE-2023-45648——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231103-0007 · NTAP-20231103-0007
CVE-2023-46218——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240125-0007 · NTAP-20240125-0007
CVE-2023-46219——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240119-0007
CVE-2023-48795——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240105-0004
CVE-2023-51384——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240105-0005
CVE-2023-51385——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240105-0005
CVE-2023-51562023-09-25HIGH7.5A flaw was found in the GNU C Library. A recent fix for CVE-2023-4806 introduced the potential for a memory leak, which may result in an application crash. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251031-0009
CVE-2023-5178——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231208-0004
CVE-2023-523402024-07-05HIGH7.5The IPv6 implementation in the Linux kernel before 6.3 has a net/ipv6/route.c max_size threshold that can be consumed easily, e.g., leading to a denial of servi NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240816-0005
CVE-2023-52425——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240614-0003
CVE-2023-524332024-02-20HIGH7.8In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: skip sync GC for new elements in this transaction New elements in NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240828-0003
CVE-2023-524342024-02-20HIGH8.1In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb: client: fix potential OOBs in smb2_parse_contexts() Validate offsets and lengths before NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250117-0009
CVE-2023-524392024-02-20HIGH7.8In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: uio: Fix use-after-free in uio_open core-1 core-2 ------------------------------------------ NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241227-0006
CVE-2023-525222024-03-02HIGH8.8In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: fix possible store tearing in neigh_periodic_work() While looking at a related syzbot r NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251114-0011
CVE-2023-526232024-03-26HIGH7.8In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: SUNRPC: Fix a suspicious RCU usage warning I received the following warning while running ct NVD ↗ ·
CVE-2023-5678——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231130-0010 · NTAP-20231130-0010
CVE-2023-59812023-11-28MEDIUM5.9A vulnerability was found that the response times to malformed ciphertexts in RSA-PSK ClientKeyExchange differ from response times of ciphertexts with correct P NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251121-0004
CVE-2023-6237——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240531-0007 · NTAP-20240531-0007
CVE-2023-6240——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240628-0002
CVE-2023-6356——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240415-0002
CVE-2023-6516——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240503-0008 · NTAP-20240503-0008
CVE-2023-6535——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240415-0003
CVE-2023-70082023-12-23MEDIUM5.9A vulnerability was found in systemd-resolved. This issue may allow systemd-resolved to accept records of DNSSEC-signed domains even when they have no signature NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241122-0004
CVE-2024-03972024-06-17HIGH7.4A defect was discovered in the Python “ssl” module where there is a memory race condition with the ssl.SSLContext methods “cert_store_stats()” and “get_ca_certs NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250411-0006
CVE-2024-04502024-03-19MEDIUM6.2An issue was found in the CPython `zipfile` module affecting versions 3.12.1, 3.11.7, 3.10.13, 3.9.18, and 3.8.18 and prior. The zipfile module is vulnerable to NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250411-0005
CVE-2024-0565——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240223-0002
CVE-2024-0727——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240208-0006
CVE-2024-0760——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240731-0004
CVE-2024-0853——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240307-0004
CVE-2024-09852024-02-08HIGH8.0Late privilege drop in REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY in PostgreSQL allows an object creator to execute arbitrary SQL functions as the command issuer. T NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241220-0005
CVE-2024-109792024-11-14HIGH8.8Incorrect control of environment variables in PostgreSQL PL/Perl allows an unprivileged database user to change sensitive process environment variables (e.g. PA NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250110-0003
CVE-2024-110532024-12-11LOW3.4When asked to both use a `.netrc` file for credentials and to follow HTTP redirects, curl could leak the password used for the first host to the followed-to hos NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250131-0003
CVE-2024-111682024-11-12LOW3.7The urllib.parse.urlsplit() and urlparse() functions improperly validated bracketed hosts (`[]`), allowing hosts that weren't IPv6 or IPvFuture. This behavior w NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250411-0004
CVE-2024-111872025-01-29HIGH7.5It is possible to construct a zone such that some queries to it will generate responses containing numerous records in the Additional section. An attacker sendi NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250207-0002
CVE-2024-112332024-11-24MEDIUM4.8In PHP versions 8.1.* before 8.1.31, 8.2.* before 8.2.26, 8.3.* before 8.3.14, due to an error in convert.quoted-printable-decode filter certain data can lead t NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241220-0008
CVE-2024-112342024-11-24MEDIUM4.8In PHP versions 8.1.* before 8.1.31, 8.2.* before 8.2.26, 8.3.* before 8.3.14, when using streams with configured proxy and "request_fulluri" option, the URI is NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241220-0008
CVE-2024-112362024-11-24CRITICAL9.8In PHP versions 8.1.* before 8.1.31, 8.2.* before 8.2.26, 8.3.* before 8.3.14, uncontrolled long string inputs to ldap_escape() function on 32-bit systems can c NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241220-0008
CVE-2024-116122024-11-22MEDIUM6.57-Zip CopyCoder Infinite Loop Denial-of-Service Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to create a denial-of-service condition on affected in NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251010-0001
CVE-2024-122432025-02-10MEDIUM5.3A flaw was found in GnuTLS, which relies on libtasn1 for ASN.1 data processing. Due to an inefficient algorithm in libtasn1, decoding certain DER-encoded certif NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250523-0002
CVE-2024-128012024-12-19LOW2.4Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in SaxEventRecorder by QOS.CH logback version 0.1 to 1.3.14 and 1.4.0 to 1.5.12 on the Java platform, allows an attacker to f NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250704-0001
CVE-2024-131762025-01-20MEDIUM4.1Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow recovering the private key exists in the ECDSA signature computation. Impact summary: A timin NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250124-0005
CVE-2024-1737——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240731-0003 · NTAP-20240731-0003
CVE-2024-1975——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240731-0002
CVE-2024-2004——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240524-0006
CVE-2024-219822024-01-12MEDIUM4.8ONTAP versions 9.4 and higher are susceptible to a vulnerability which when successfully exploited could lead to disclosure of sensitive information to unprivil NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240111-0001
CVE-2024-219852024-01-26HIGH7.6ONTAP 9 versions prior to 9.9.1P18, 9.10.1P16, 9.11.1P13, 9.12.1P10 and 9.13.1P4 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow an authenticated user with NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240126-0001
CVE-2024-219892024-04-17HIGH8.1ONTAP Select Deploy administration utility versions 9.12.1.x, 9.13.1.x and 9.14.1.x are susceptible to a vulnerability which when successfully exploited could a NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240411-0001
CVE-2024-219902024-04-17MEDIUM5.4ONTAP Select Deploy administration utility versions 9.12.1.x, 9.13.1.x and 9.14.1.x contain hard-coded credentials that could allow an attacker to view Deploy c NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240411-0002
CVE-2024-22257——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240419-0005
CVE-2024-2398——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240503-0009
CVE-2024-24795——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240415-0013
CVE-2024-24806——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240605-0008 · NTAP-20240605-0008
CVE-2024-250622024-02-04HIGH7.5An issue was discovered in libxml2 before 2.11.7 and 2.12.x before 2.12.5. When using the XML Reader interface with DTD validation and XInclude expansion enable NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260116-0019
CVE-2024-2511——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240503-0013 · NTAP-20240503-0013
CVE-2024-26458——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240415-0010
CVE-2024-26461——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240415-0011
CVE-2024-26462——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240415-0012
CVE-2024-266332024-03-18MEDIUM5.5In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ip6_tunnel: fix NEXTHDR_FRAGMENT handling in ip6_tnl_parse_tlv_enc_lim() syzbot pointed out NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241220-0001
CVE-2024-266412024-03-18HIGH8.6In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ip6_tunnel: make sure to pull inner header in __ip6_tnl_rcv() syzbot found __ip6_tnl_rcv() c NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241108-0008
CVE-2024-268822024-04-17HIGH7.3In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: ip_tunnel: make sure to pull inner header in ip_tunnel_rcv() Apply the same fix than on NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241220-0002
CVE-2024-272802024-05-14CRITICAL9.8A buffer-overread issue was discovered in StringIO 3.0.1, as distributed in Ruby 3.0.x through 3.0.6 and 3.1.x through 3.1.4. The ungetbyte and ungetc methods o NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250502-0003
CVE-2024-27316——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240415-0013
CVE-2024-273982024-05-14HIGH8.0In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: Fix use-after-free bugs caused by sco_sock_timeout When the sco connection is est NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240912-0012
CVE-2024-2756——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240510-0008
CVE-2024-28752——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240517-0001
CVE-2024-28757——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240322-0001
CVE-2024-28834——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240524-0004 · NTAP-20240524-0004
CVE-2024-291312024-03-21HIGH7.3Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in Apache Commons Configuration.This issue affects Apache Commons Configuration: from 2.0 before 2.10.1. Users are recommended NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241213-0001
CVE-2024-291332024-03-21MEDIUM5.4Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in Apache Commons Configuration.This issue affects Apache Commons Configuration: from 2.0 before 2.10.1. Users are recommended NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250605-0002
CVE-2024-2961——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240531-0002
CVE-2024-297362024-07-19CRITICAL9.1A SSRF vulnerability in WADL service description in versions of Apache CXF before 4.0.5, 3.6.4 and 3.5.9 allows an attacker to perform SSRF style attacks on RES NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241115-0003
CVE-2024-298572024-05-14HIGH7.5An issue was discovered in ECCurve.java and ECCurve.cs in Bouncy Castle Java (BC Java) before 1.78, BC Java LTS before 2.73.6, BC-FJA before 1.0.2.5, and BC C# NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241206-0008 · NTAP-20241206-0008
CVE-2024-30171——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240614-0008
CVE-2024-32007——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240808-0009
CVE-2024-347502024-07-03HIGH7.5Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions, Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in Apache Tomcat. When processing an HTTP/2 stream, Tomcat did not NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240816-0004 · NTAP-20240816-0004
CVE-2024-358902024-05-19HIGH7.8In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: gro: fix ownership transfer If packets are GROed with fraglist they might be segmented later NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250509-0008
CVE-2024-358962024-05-19HIGH7.1In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: validate user input for expected length I got multiple syzbot reports showing old NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250321-0004
CVE-2024-36387——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240712-0001
CVE-2024-368832024-05-30HIGH7.8In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: fix out-of-bounds access in ops_init net_alloc_generic is called by net_alloc, which is NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241018-0001
CVE-2024-368862024-05-30CRITICAL9.8In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tipc: fix UAF in error path Sam Page (sam4k) working with Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative re NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241018-0002
CVE-2024-369052024-05-30MEDIUM5.5In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp: defer shutdown(SEND_SHUTDOWN) for TCP_SYN_RECV sockets TCP_SYN_RECV state is really spe NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240905-0005
CVE-2024-369292024-05-30HIGH7.5In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: core: reject skb_copy(_expand) for fraglist GSO skbs SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST skbs must not be NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240905-0010
CVE-2024-369332024-05-30HIGH7.8In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nsh: Restore skb->{protocol,data,mac_header} for outer header in nsh_gso_segment(). syzbot t NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240912-0006
CVE-2024-369452024-05-30HIGH7.5In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/smc: fix neighbour and rtable leak in smc_ib_find_route() In smc_ib_find_route(), the ne NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250404-0006
CVE-2024-373702024-06-28HIGH7.5In MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) before 1.21.3, an attacker can modify the plaintext Extra Count field of a confidential GSS krb5 wrap token, causing the unwrapped NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241108-0007
CVE-2024-373712024-06-28CRITICAL9.1In MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) before 1.21.3, an attacker can cause invalid memory reads during GSS message token handling by sending message tokens with invalid NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241108-0009
CVE-2024-384282024-06-16CRITICAL9.1url.c in GNU Wget through 1.24.5 mishandles semicolons in the userinfo subcomponent of a URI, and thus there may be insecure behavior in which data that was sup NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241115-0005 · NTAP-20241115-0005
CVE-2024-38472——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240712-0001
CVE-2024-38473——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240712-0001
CVE-2024-38474——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240712-0001
CVE-2024-38475——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240712-0001
CVE-2024-38476——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240712-0001
CVE-2024-38477——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240712-0001
CVE-2024-388092024-09-27MEDIUM5.3Applications that parse ETags from "If-Match" or "If-None-Match" request headers are vulnerable to DoS attack. Users of affected versions should upgrade to the NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240920-0003
CVE-2024-388202024-10-18LOW3.1The fix for CVE-2022-22968 made disallowedFields patterns in DataBinder case insensitive. However, String.toLowerCase() has some Locale dependent exceptions tha NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241129-0003
CVE-2024-39573——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240712-0001
CVE-2024-396892024-07-05HIGH7.5Certifi is a curated collection of Root Certificates for validating the trustworthiness of SSL certificates while verifying the identity of TLS hosts. Certifi s NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241206-0001
CVE-2024-39884——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240712-0002
CVE-2024-4032——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240726-0004
CVE-2024-40725——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240808-0007
CVE-2024-4076——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240731-0001
CVE-2024-419962024-08-26HIGH7.5Validating the order of the public keys in the Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Protocol, when an approved safe prime is used, allows remote attackers (from the cli NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260227-0009
CVE-2024-421542024-07-30MEDIUM4.4In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp_metrics: validate source addr length I don't see anything checking that TCP_METRICS_ATTR NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240828-0010
CVE-2024-422562024-08-08HIGH7.5In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: cifs: Fix server re-repick on subrequest retry When a subrequest is marked for needing retry NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250627-0004
CVE-2024-425162025-07-10HIGH7.5HTTP response splitting in the core of Apache HTTP Server allows an attacker who can manipulate the Content-Type response headers of applications hosted or prox NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250718-0013
CVE-2024-432042025-07-10HIGH7.5SSRF in Apache HTTP Server with mod_proxy loaded allows an attacker to send outbound proxy requests to a URL controlled by the attacker. Requires an unlikely co NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250718-0013
CVE-2024-433942025-07-10HIGH7.5Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Apache HTTP Server on Windows allows to potentially leak NTLM hashes to a malicious server via mod_rewrite or apache expre NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250718-0013
CVE-2024-452872024-09-05HIGH7.5A malicious value of size in a structure of packed libnv can cause an integer overflow, leading to the allocation of a smaller buffer than required for the pars NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240926-0010
CVE-2024-452882024-09-05HIGH8.4A missing null-termination character in the last element of an nvlist array string can lead to writing outside the allocated buffer. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240920-0008
CVE-2024-454902024-08-30HIGH7.5An issue was discovered in libexpat before 2.6.3. xmlparse.c does not reject a negative length for XML_ParseBuffer. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241018-0004
CVE-2024-4603——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0001
CVE-2024-472522025-07-10HIGH7.5Insufficient escaping of user-supplied data in mod_ssl in Apache HTTP Server 2.4.63 and earlier allows an untrusted SSL/TLS client to insert escape characters i NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250718-0013
CVE-2024-4741——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0004
CVE-2024-475542024-10-03MEDIUM4.3Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in Apache Commons IO. The org.apache.commons.io.input.XmlStreamReader class may excessively consume CPU resource NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250131-0010
CVE-2024-476852024-10-21CRITICAL9.1In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nf_reject_ipv6: fix nf_reject_ip6_tcphdr_put() syzbot reported that nf_reject_ip6 NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250613-0011
CVE-2024-476932024-10-21MEDIUM6.5In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: IB/core: Fix ib_cache_setup_one error flow cleanup When ib_cache_update return an error, we NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250627-0002
CVE-2024-478502024-10-04HIGH7.5CUPS cups-browsed before 2.5b1 will send an HTTP POST request to an arbitrary destination and port in response to a single IPP UDP packet requesting a printer t NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241011-0002
CVE-2024-499972024-10-21HIGH7.5In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: ethernet: lantiq_etop: fix memory disclosure When applying padding, the buffer is not z NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250627-0005
CVE-2024-500832024-10-29HIGH7.5In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp: fix mptcp DSS corruption due to large pmtu xmit Syzkaller was able to trigger a DSS cor NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250523-0010
CVE-2024-525332024-11-11CRITICAL9.8gio/gsocks4aproxy.c in GNOME GLib before 2.82.1 has an off-by-one error and resultant buffer overflow because SOCKS4_CONN_MSG_LEN is not sufficient for a traili NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241206-0009
CVE-2024-535802024-12-18HIGH7.5iperf v3.17.1 was discovered to contain a segmentation violation via the iperf_exchange_parameters() function. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250404-0009
CVE-2024-5458——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240726-0001
CVE-2024-5535——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240712-0005
CVE-2024-561712025-02-18HIGH7.8libxml2 before 2.12.10 and 2.13.x before 2.13.6 has a use-after-free in xmlSchemaIDCFillNodeTables and xmlSchemaBubbleIDCNodeTables in xmlschemas.c. To exploit NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250328-0010
CVE-2024-61192024-09-03HIGH7.5Issue summary: Applications performing certificate name checks (e.g., TLS clients checking server certificates) may attempt to read an invalid memory address re NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240912-0001
CVE-2024-62322024-09-03HIGH7.5There is a MEDIUM severity vulnerability affecting CPython. Regular expressions that allowed excessive backtracking during tarfile.TarFile header parsing are vu NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241018-0007
CVE-2024-6387——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240701-0001
CVE-2024-6409——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240712-0003
CVE-2024-67632024-10-14LOW3.7Eclipse Jetty is a lightweight, highly scalable, Java-based web server and Servlet engine . It includes a utility class, HttpURI, for URI/URL parsing. The HttpU NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250306-0005
CVE-2024-69232024-08-01MEDIUM5.5There is a MEDIUM severity vulnerability affecting CPython. The email module didn’t properly quote newlines for email headers when serializing an email message NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240926-0003
CVE-2024-70062024-08-12HIGH7.5A null pointer dereference flaw was found in Libtiff via `tif_dirinfo.c`. This issue may allow an attacker to trigger memory allocation failures through certain NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240920-0001
CVE-2024-72542024-09-19HIGH7.5Any project that parses untrusted Protocol Buffers data containing an arbitrary number of nested groups / series of SGROUP tags can corrupted by exceeding the s NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241213-0010
CVE-2024-72642024-07-31MEDIUM6.5libcurl's ASN1 parser code has the `GTime2str()` function, used for parsing an ASN.1 Generalized Time field. If given an syntactically incorrect field, the pars NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240828-0008
CVE-2024-75922024-08-19HIGH7.5There is a LOW severity vulnerability affecting CPython, specifically the 'http.cookies' standard library module. When parsing cookies that contained backslashe NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241018-0006
CVE-2024-80882024-08-22HIGH8.7There is a HIGH severity vulnerability affecting the CPython "zipfile" module affecting "zipfile.Path". Note that the more common API "zipfile.ZipFile" class is NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241011-0010
CVE-2024-80962024-09-11MEDIUM6.5When curl is told to use the Certificate Status Request TLS extension, often referred to as OCSP stapling, to verify that the server certificate is valid, it mi NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241011-0005
CVE-2024-81762025-03-14HIGH7.5A stack overflow vulnerability exists in the libexpat library due to the way it handles recursive entity expansion in XML documents. When parsing an XML documen NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250328-0009
CVE-2024-89252024-10-08LOW3.1In PHP versions 8.1.* before 8.1.30, 8.2.* before 8.2.24, 8.3.* before 8.3.12, erroneous parsing of multipart form data contained in an HTTP POST request could NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241101-0003
CVE-2024-89262024-10-08HIGH8.1In PHP versions 8.1.* before 8.1.30, 8.2.* before 8.2.24, 8.3.* before 8.3.12, when using a certain non-standard configurations of Windows codepages, the fixes NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241101-0003
CVE-2024-89272024-10-08HIGH7.5In PHP versions 8.1.* before 8.1.30, 8.2.* before 8.2.24, 8.3.* before 8.3.12, HTTP_REDIRECT_STATUS variable is used to check whether or not CGI binary is being NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241101-0003
CVE-2024-89322024-11-22CRITICAL9.8In PHP versions 8.1.* before 8.1.31, 8.2.* before 8.2.26, 8.3.* before 8.3.14, uncontrolled long string inputs to ldap_escape() function on 32-bit systems can c NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250110-0009
CVE-2024-90262024-10-08LOW3.3In PHP versions 8.1.* before 8.1.30, 8.2.* before 8.2.24, 8.3.* before 8.3.12, when using PHP-FPM SAPI and it is configured to catch workers output through catc NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241101-0003
CVE-2024-91432024-10-16MEDIUM4.3Issue summary: Use of the low-level GF(2^m) elliptic curve APIs with untrusted explicit values for the field polynomial can lead to out-of-bounds memory reads o NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241101-0001
CVE-2024-92872024-10-22HIGH7.8A vulnerability has been found in the CPython `venv` module and CLI where path names provided when creating a virtual environment were not quoted properly, allo NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250425-0006
CVE-2024-96812024-11-06MEDIUM6.5When curl is asked to use HSTS, the expiry time for a subdomain might overwrite a parent domain's cache entry, making it end sooner or later than otherwise inte NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241213-0006
CVE-2025-01672025-02-05LOW3.4When asked to use a `.netrc` file for credentials **and** to follow HTTP redirects, curl could leak the password used for the first host to the followed-to host NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250306-0008
CVE-2025-09382025-01-31MEDIUM6.3The Python standard library functions `urllib.parse.urlsplit` and `urlparse` accepted domain names that included square brackets which isn't valid according to NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250314-0002
CVE-2025-10942025-02-13HIGH8.1Improper neutralization of quoting syntax in PostgreSQL libpq functions PQescapeLiteral(), PQescapeIdentifier(), PQescapeString(), and PQescapeStringConn() allo NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250221-0010
CVE-2025-111872026-01-27MEDIUM6.1Issue summary: PBMAC1 parameters in PKCS#12 files are missing validation which can trigger a stack-based buffer overflow, invalid pointer or NULL pointer derefe NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260204-0012
CVE-2025-11802025-02-11LOW3.1A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in GNU Binutils 2.43. This affects the function _bfd_elf_write_section_eh_frame of the file bfd/elf-eh- NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250814-0008
CVE-2025-12192025-03-30MEDIUM5.3In PHP from 8.1.* before 8.1.32, from 8.2.* before 8.2.28, from 8.3.* before 8.3.19, from 8.4.* before 8.4.5, when requesting a HTTP resource using the DOM or S NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250523-0007
CVE-2025-145242026-01-08MEDIUM5.3When an OAuth2 bearer token is used for an HTTP(S) transfer, and that transfer performs a cross-protocol redirect to a second URL that uses an IMAP, LDAP, POP3 NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260213-0015
CVE-2025-148472025-12-19HIGH7.5Mismatched length fields in Zlib compressed protocol headers may allow a read of uninitialized heap memory by an unauthenticated client. This issue affects all NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260102-0016
CVE-2025-152812026-01-20HIGH7.5Calling wordexp with WRDE_REUSE in conjunction with WRDE_APPEND in the GNU C Library version 2.0 to version 2.42 may cause the interface to return uninitialized NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260313-0001
CVE-2025-154672026-01-27HIGH8.8Issue summary: Parsing CMS AuthEnvelopedData or EnvelopedData message with maliciously crafted AEAD parameters can trigger a stack buffer overflow. Impact summa NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260204-0011
CVE-2025-154682026-01-27MEDIUM5.9Issue summary: If an application using the SSL_CIPHER_find() function in a QUIC protocol client or server receives an unknown cipher suite from the peer, a NULL NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260204-0013
CVE-2025-17362025-03-30HIGH7.3In PHP from 8.1.* before 8.1.32, from 8.2.* before 8.2.28, from 8.3.* before 8.3.19, from 8.4.* before 8.4.5, when user-supplied headers are sent, the insuffici NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250523-0006
CVE-2025-219472025-04-01HIGH8.1In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ksmbd: fix type confusion via race condition when using ipc_msg_send_request req->handle is NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260424-0018
CVE-2025-220402025-04-16HIGH8.8In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ksmbd: fix session use-after-free in multichannel connection There is a race condition betwe NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260424-0017
CVE-2025-220412025-04-16HIGH8.8In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ksmbd: fix use-after-free in ksmbd_sessions_deregister() In multichannel mode, UAF issue can NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260424-0016
CVE-2025-228712025-04-08CRITICAL9.1The net/http package improperly accepts a bare LF as a line terminator in chunked data chunk-size lines. This can permit request smuggling if a net/http server NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250530-0004
CVE-2025-230482025-07-10CRITICAL9.1In some mod_ssl configurations on Apache HTTP Server 2.4.35 through to 2.4.63, an access control bypass by trusted clients is possible using TLS 1.3 session res NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250718-0013
CVE-2025-231842025-01-21MEDIUM5.9A potential denial of service vulnerability is present in versions of Apache CXF before 3.5.10, 3.6.5 and 4.0.6. In some edge cases, the CachedOutputStream inst NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250214-0003
CVE-2025-23362025-06-04MEDIUM4.8Improper sanitization of the value of the 'href' and 'xlink:href' attributes in '<image>' SVG elements in AngularJS's 'ngSanitize' module allows attackers to by NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251128-0015
CVE-2025-242962025-08-12MEDIUM6.0Improper input validation in some firmware for the Intel(R) E810 Ethernet before version 4.6 may allow a privileged user to enable denial of service via local a NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260109-0004
CVE-2025-248512026-02-10MEDIUM6.0Uncaught exception in the firmware for some 100GbE Intel(R) Ethernet Controller E810 before version cvl fw 1.7.8.x within Ring 0: Bare Metal OS may allow a deni NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260313-0014
CVE-2025-249282025-02-18HIGH7.8libxml2 before 2.12.10 and 2.13.x before 2.13.6 has a stack-based buffer overflow in xmlSnprintfElements in valid.c. To exploit this, DTD validation must occur NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250321-0006
CVE-2025-264652025-02-18MEDIUM6.8A vulnerability was found in OpenSSH when the VerifyHostKeyDNS option is enabled. A machine-in-the-middle attack can be performed by a malicious machine imperso NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250228-0003
CVE-2025-264662025-02-28MEDIUM5.9A flaw was found in the OpenSSH package. For each ping packet the SSH server receives, a pong packet is allocated in a memory buffer and stored in a queue of pa NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250228-0002
CVE-2025-271132025-02-18LOW2.9libxml2 before 2.12.10 and 2.13.x before 2.13.6 has a NULL pointer dereference in xmlPatMatch in pattern.c. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250306-0004
CVE-2025-272432026-02-10MEDIUM6.0Out-of-bounds write in the firmware for some Intel(R) Ethernet Controller E810 before version cvl fw 1.7.8.x within Ring 0: Bare Metal OS may allow a denial of NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260313-0014
CVE-2025-273632025-03-11HIGH8.1An out of bounds write exists in FreeType versions 2.13.0 and below (newer versions of FreeType are not vulnerable) when attempting to parse font subglyph struc NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250613-0008
CVE-2025-275352026-02-10MEDIUM5.3Exposed ioctl with insufficient access control in the firmware for some Intel(R) Ethernet Connection E825-C. before version NVM ver. 3.84 within Ring 0: Bare Me NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260313-0014
CVE-2025-275582025-05-21CRITICAL9.1IEEE P802.11-REVme D1.1 through D7.0 allows FragAttacks against mesh networks. In mesh networks using Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA, WPA2, or WPA3) or Wired Equiv NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260116-0017
CVE-2025-278202025-04-24HIGH7.5A bug in PSL validation logic in Apache HttpClient 5.4.x disables domain checks, affecting cookie management and host name verification. Discovered by the Apach NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250516-0003
CVE-2025-28842025-06-10MEDIUM6.6TCG TPM2.0 Reference implementation's CryptHmacSign helper function is vulnerable to Out-of-Bounds read due to the lack of validation the signature scheme with NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250620-0007
CVE-2025-302112025-03-28HIGH7.5Erlang/OTP is a set of libraries for the Erlang programming language. Prior to versions OTP-27.3.1, 26.2.5.10, and 25.3.2.19, a maliciously formed KEX init mess NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250530-0006
CVE-2025-311152025-04-03HIGH8.7XZ Utils provide a general-purpose data-compression library plus command-line tools. In XZ Utils 5.3.3alpha to 5.8.0, the multithreaded .xz decoder in liblzma h NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250530-0001
CVE-2025-311332025-11-06HIGH7.8runc is a CLI tool for spawning and running containers according to the OCI specification. In versions 1.2.7 and below, 1.3.0-rc.1 through 1.3.1, 1.4.0-rc.1 and NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251121-0001
CVE-2025-320032026-02-10MEDIUM6.5Out-of-bounds read in the firmware for some 100GbE Intel(R) Ethernet Network Adapter E810 before version cvl fw 1.7.6, cpk 1.3.7 within Ring 0: Bare Metal OS ma NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260313-0014
CVE-2025-324152025-04-17LOW2.9In libxml2 before 2.13.8 and 2.14.x before 2.14.2, xmlSchemaIDCFillNodeTables in xmlschemas.c has a heap-based buffer under-read. To exploit this, a crafted XML NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250605-0003 · NTAP-20250605-0003
CVE-2025-329882025-07-10MEDIUM6.5A flaw was found in GnuTLS. A double-free vulnerability exists in GnuTLS due to incorrect ownership handling in the export logic of Subject Alternative Name (SA NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250725-0009
CVE-2025-379242025-05-20CRITICAL9.8In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ksmbd: fix use-after-free in kerberos authentication Setting sess->user = NULL was introduce NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260424-0011
CVE-2025-379972025-05-29HIGH7.8In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: ipset: fix region locking in hash types Region locking introduced in v5.6-rc4 con NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251128-0011
CVE-2025-387322025-09-05MEDIUM5.5In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nf_reject: don't leak dst refcount for loopback packets recent patches to add a W NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260123-0006
CVE-2025-398232025-09-16HIGH7.8In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: x86: use array_index_nospec with indices that come from guest min and dest_id are guest NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251224-0012
CVE-2025-398282025-09-16HIGH7.8In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: atm: atmtcp: Prevent arbitrary write in atmtcp_recv_control(). syzbot reported the splat bel NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251224-0013
CVE-2025-399422025-10-04HIGH7.5In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ksmbd: smbdirect: verify remaining_data_length respects max_fragmented_recv_size This is ins NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260123-0004
CVE-2025-399462025-10-04CRITICAL9.8In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tls: make sure to abort the stream if headers are bogus Normally we wait for the socket to b NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260121-0010
CVE-2025-399732025-10-15HIGH8.8In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: i40e: add validation for ring_len param The `ring_len` parameter provided by the virtual fun NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260213-0016
CVE-2025-400272025-10-28HIGH7.8In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/9p: fix double req put in p9_fd_cancelled Syzkaller reports a KASAN issue as below: gene NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260123-0005
CVE-2025-45162025-05-15MEDIUM5.9There is an issue in CPython when using `bytes.decode("unicode_escape", error="ignore|replace")`. If you are not using the "unicode_escape" encoding or an error NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250711-0004
CVE-2025-489882025-06-16HIGH7.5Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in Apache Tomcat. This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.7, from 10.1. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251114-0003
CVE-2025-489892025-08-13HIGH7.5Improper Resource Shutdown or Release vulnerability in Apache Tomcat made Tomcat vulnerable to the made you reset attack. This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250822-0010
CVE-2025-49472025-05-28MEDIUM6.5libcurl accidentally skips the certificate verification for QUIC connections when connecting to a host specified as an IP address in the URL. Therefore, it does NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250620-0009
CVE-2025-496302025-07-10HIGH7.5In certain proxy configurations, a denial of service attack against Apache HTTP Server versions 2.4.26 through to 2.4.63 can be triggered by untrusted clients c NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250718-0013
CVE-2025-498122025-07-10HIGH7.4In some mod_ssl configurations on Apache HTTP Server versions through to 2.4.63, an HTTP desynchronisation attack allows a man-in-the-middle attacker to hijack NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250718-0013
CVE-2025-50252025-05-28MEDIUM4.8libcurl supports *pinning* of the server certificate public key for HTTPS transfers. Due to an omission, this check is not performed when connecting with QUIC f NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250620-0008
CVE-2025-525652025-11-06HIGH7.5runc is a CLI tool for spawning and running containers according to the OCI specification. Versions 1.0.0-rc3 through 1.2.7, 1.3.0-rc.1 through 1.3.2, and 1.4.0 NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251121-0002
CVE-2025-528812025-11-06HIGH7.5runc is a CLI tool for spawning and running containers according to the OCI specification. In versions 1.2.7, 1.3.2 and 1.4.0-rc.2, an attacker can trick runc i NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251121-0003
CVE-2025-530202025-07-10HIGH7.5Late Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime vulnerability in Apache HTTP Server. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server: from 2.4.17 up to 2.4.63. Users are NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250718-0013
CVE-2025-581832025-10-29MEDIUM4.3tar.Reader does not set a maximum size on the number of sparse region data blocks in GNU tar pax 1.0 sparse files. A maliciously-crafted archive containing a la NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260703-0007
CVE-2025-581852025-10-29MEDIUM5.3Parsing a maliciously crafted DER payload could allocate large amounts of memory, causing memory exhaustion. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260703-0007
CVE-2025-581862025-10-29MEDIUM5.3Despite HTTP headers having a default limit of 1MB, the number of cookies that can be parsed does not have a limit. By sending a lot of very small cookies such NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260703-0007
CVE-2025-581872025-10-29HIGH7.5Due to the design of the name constraint checking algorithm, the processing time of some inputs scale non-linearly with respect to the size of the certificate. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260612-0003
CVE-2025-581882025-10-29HIGH7.5Validating certificate chains which contain DSA public keys can cause programs to panic, due to a interface cast that assumes they implement the Equal method. T NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260703-0007
CVE-2025-581892025-10-29MEDIUM5.3When Conn.Handshake fails during ALPN negotiation the error contains attacker controlled information (the ALPN protocols sent by the client) which is not escape NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260703-0007
CVE-2025-60202025-06-17HIGH7.8A flaw was found in linux-pam. The module pam_namespace may use access user-controlled paths without proper protection, allowing local users to elevate their pr NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260403-0005
CVE-2025-60212025-06-12HIGH7.5A flaw was found in libxml2's xmlBuildQName function, where integer overflows in buffer size calculations can lead to a stack-based buffer overflow. This issue NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250711-0009
CVE-2025-617232025-10-29HIGH7.5The processing time for parsing some invalid inputs scales non-linearly with respect to the size of the input. This affects programs which parse untrusted PEM i NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260703-0007
CVE-2025-617242025-10-29MEDIUM5.3The Reader.ReadResponse function constructs a response string through repeated string concatenation of lines. When the number of lines in a response is large, t NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260703-0007
CVE-2025-617252025-10-29HIGH7.5The ParseAddress function constructs domain-literal address components through repeated string concatenation. When parsing large domain-literal components, this NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260703-0007
CVE-2025-617262026-01-28HIGH7.5The net/url package does not set a limit on the number of query parameters in a query. While the maximum size of query parameters in URLs is generally limited b NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260311-0009
CVE-2025-617272025-12-03MEDIUM6.5An excluded subdomain constraint in a certificate chain does not restrict the usage of wildcard SANs in the leaf certificate. For example a constraint that excl NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260130-0003
CVE-2025-617282026-01-28MEDIUM6.5archive/zip uses a super-linear file name indexing algorithm that is invoked the first time a file in an archive is opened. This can lead to a denial of service NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260703-0006
CVE-2025-617292025-12-02HIGH7.5Within HostnameError.Error(), when constructing an error string, there is no limit to the number of hosts that will be printed out. Furthermore, the error strin NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260130-0002
CVE-2025-617302026-01-28MEDIUM5.3During the TLS 1.3 handshake if multiple messages are sent in records that span encryption level boundaries (for instance the Client Hello and Encrypted Extensi NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260703-0006
CVE-2025-617312026-01-28HIGH7.8Building a malicious file with cmd/go can cause can cause a write to an attacker-controlled file with partial control of the file content. The "#cgo pkg-config: NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260703-0006
CVE-2025-63952025-07-10MEDIUM6.5A NULL pointer dereference flaw was found in the GnuTLS software in _gnutls_figure_common_ciphersuite(). NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250725-0007
CVE-2025-645062025-11-25MEDIUM6.1LIBPNG is a reference library for use in applications that read, create, and manipulate PNG (Portable Network Graphics) raster image files. From version 1.6.0 t NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260116-0005
CVE-2025-660352025-11-26HIGH7.7Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 2 NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251224-0007
CVE-2025-661992026-01-27MEDIUM5.9Issue summary: A TLS 1.3 connection using certificate compression can be forced to allocate a large buffer before decompression without checking against the con NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260204-0015
CVE-2025-664122025-12-01MEDIUM5.4Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, an NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251224-0006
CVE-2025-664182025-12-05HIGH7.5urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. Starting in version 1.24 and prior to 2.6.0, the number of links in the decompression chain was unbou NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251224-0008
CVE-2025-664712025-12-05HIGH7.5urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. Starting in version 1.0 and prior to 2.6.0, the Streaming API improperly handles highly compressed da NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251224-0009
CVE-2025-681192026-01-28HIGH7.0Downloading and building modules with malicious version strings can cause local code execution. On systems with Mercurial (hg) installed, downloading modules fr NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260703-0006
CVE-2025-694192026-01-27HIGH7.4Issue summary: Calling PKCS12_get_friendlyname() function on a maliciously crafted PKCS#12 file with a BMPString (UTF-16BE) friendly name containing non-ASCII B NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260204-0008
CVE-2025-694202026-01-27HIGH7.5Issue summary: A type confusion vulnerability exists in the TimeStamp Response verification code where an ASN1_TYPE union member is accessed without first valid NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260204-0006
CVE-2025-74252025-07-10HIGH7.8A flaw was found in libxslt where the attribute type, atype, flags are modified in a way that corrupts internal memory management. When XSLT functions, such as NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260116-0014
CVE-2025-88852025-08-12MEDIUM6.3Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. BC Java bcprov on All (API modules), Legion of the Bouncy NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250912-0012
CVE-2025-89162025-08-13MEDIUM6.3Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. BC Java bcpkix on All (API modules), Legion of the Bouncy NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250912-0011
CVE-2025-89412025-08-13HIGH7.8A flaw was found in linux-pam. The pam_namespace module may improperly handle user-controlled paths, allowing local users to exploit symlink attacks and race co NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260403-0006
CVE-2025-90862025-09-12HIGH7.51. A cookie is set using the `secure` keyword for `https://target` 2. curl is redirected to or otherwise made to speak with `http://target` (same hostname, but NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251031-0007
CVE-2025-92302025-09-30HIGH7.5Issue summary: An application trying to decrypt CMS messages encrypted using password based encryption can trigger an out-of-bounds read and write. Impact summa NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251003-0011
CVE-2025-97142025-09-10MEDIUM6.2Uncontrolled recursion in XPath evaluation in libxml2 up to and including version 2.9.14 allows a local attacker to cause a stack overflow via crafted expressio NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260320-0006
CVE-2026-06032026-01-23HIGH8.3A flaw was found in Hibernate. A remote attacker with low privileges could exploit a second-order SQL injection vulnerability by providing specially crafted, un NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260508-0018
CVE-2026-09152026-01-15HIGH7.5Calling getnetbyaddr or getnetbyaddr_r with a configured nsswitch.conf that specifies the library's DNS backend for networks and queries for a zero-valued netwo NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260313-0003
CVE-2026-09642026-03-26MEDIUM6.3A malicious SCP server can send unexpected paths that could make the client application override local files outside of working directory. This could be misused NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260501-0015
CVE-2026-09652026-03-26LOW3.3A flaw was found in libssh where it can attempt to open arbitrary files during configuration parsing. A local attacker can exploit this by providing a malicious NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260501-0015
CVE-2026-09662026-03-26HIGH8.2A flaw was found in libssh. The API function `ssh_get_hexa()` is vulnerable to a denial of service when processing zero-length input. This can be exploited remo NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260501-0015
CVE-2026-09672026-03-26MEDIUM5.5A flaw was found in libssh. A remote attacker, by controlling client configuration files or known_hosts files, could craft specific hostnames that when processe NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260501-0015
CVE-2026-09682026-03-26LOW3.1A flaw was found in libssh in which a malicious SFTP (SSH File Transfer Protocol) server can exploit this by sending a malformed 'longname' field within an `SSH NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260501-0015
CVE-2026-09902026-01-15MEDIUM5.9A flaw was found in libxml2, an XML parsing library. This uncontrolled recursion vulnerability occurs in the xmlCatalogXMLResolveURI function when an XML catalo NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260220-0013
CVE-2026-19652026-03-11MEDIUM6.5libcurl can in some circumstances reuse the wrong connection when asked to do an Negotiate-authenticated HTTP or HTTPS request. libcurl features a pool of recen NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260327-0002
CVE-2026-220492026-07-22HIGH8.8ONTAP versions 9.16.1 and higher with WebAuthn multi-factor authentication (MFA) configured are susceptible to a vulnerability related to the Relying Party ID w NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260722-0001
CVE-2026-220502026-01-12MEDIUM4.3ONTAP versions 9.16.1 prior to 9.16.1P9 and 9.17.1 prior to 9.17.1P2 with snapshot locking enabled are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow a privil NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260112-0001
CVE-2026-220522026-03-05MEDIUM4.3ONTAP versions 9.12.1 and higher with S3 NAS buckets are susceptible to an information disclosure vulnerability. Successful exploit could allow an authenticated NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260304-0001
CVE-2026-227322026-03-19CRITICAL9.1When applications specify HTTP response headers for servlet applications using Spring Security, there is the possibility that the HTTP Headers will not be writt NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260501-0013
CVE-2026-227952026-01-27MEDIUM5.5Issue summary: An invalid or NULL pointer dereference can happen in an application processing a malformed PKCS#12 file. Impact summary: An application processin NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260204-0005
CVE-2026-227962026-01-27MEDIUM5.3Issue summary: A type confusion vulnerability exists in the signature verification of signed PKCS#7 data where an ASN1_TYPE union member is accessed without fir NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260204-0004
CVE-2026-229902026-01-23HIGH7.5In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: libceph: replace overzealous BUG_ON in osdmap_apply_incremental() If the osdmap is (maliciou NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260508-0002
CVE-2026-229912026-01-23HIGH7.5In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: libceph: make free_choose_arg_map() resilient to partial allocation free_choose_arg_map() ma NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260508-0006
CVE-2026-229922026-01-23HIGH7.5In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: libceph: return the handler error from mon_handle_auth_done() Currently any error from ceph_ NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260508-0005 · NTAP-20260508-0005
CVE-2026-229982026-01-25HIGH7.5In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nvme-tcp: fix NULL pointer dereferences in nvmet_tcp_build_pdu_iovec Commit efa56305908b ("n NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260424-0019 · NTAP-20260424-0019
CVE-2026-230982026-02-04HIGH8.8In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netrom: fix double-free in nr_route_frame() In nr_route_frame(), old_skb is immediately free NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260424-0015 · NTAP-20260424-0015
CVE-2026-232302026-02-18HIGH8.8In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb: client: split cached_fid bitfields to avoid shared-byte RMW races is_open, has_lease an NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260424-0014
CVE-2026-232312026-03-04HIGH7.8In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nf_tables: fix use-after-free in nf_tables_addchain() nf_tables_addchain() publis NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260320-0013
CVE-2026-239412026-03-13CRITICAL9.4Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request Smuggling') vulnerability in Erlang OTP (inets httpd module) allows HTTP Request Smuggling. This vul NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260703-0005
CVE-2026-239422026-03-13MEDIUM5.4Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in Erlang OTP (ssh_sftpd module) allows Path Traversal. This vulner NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260703-0005
CVE-2026-239432026-03-13MEDIUM5.3Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Compression Bomb) vulnerability in Erlang OTP ssh (ssh_transport modules) allows Denial of Service via Resource Dep NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260703-0005
CVE-2026-239492026-01-20HIGH8.6jaraco.context, an open-source software package that provides some useful decorators and context managers, has a Zip Slip path traversal vulnerability in the `j NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260327-0011
CVE-2026-248802026-04-09HIGH7.5Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') vulnerability in Apache Tomcat via invalid chunk extension. This issue affects NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260501-0014
CVE-2026-256392026-02-09HIGH7.5Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. Prior to versions 0.30.3 and 1.13.5, the mergeConfig function in axios crashes with a TypeErro NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260313-0010
CVE-2026-256792026-03-06HIGH7.5url.Parse insufficiently validated the host/authority component and accepted some invalid URLs. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260422-0007
CVE-2026-26732026-03-13MEDIUM6.5Issue summary: An OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server may fail to negotiate the expected preferred key exchange group when its key exchange group configuration includes the NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260320-0015
CVE-2026-271352026-03-18HIGH7.5nghttp2 is an implementation of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2 in C. Prior to version 1.68.1, the nghttp2 library stops reading the incoming data whe NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260717-0011
CVE-2026-271372026-03-06HIGH7.5When verifying a certificate chain which contains a certificate containing multiple email address constraints which share common local portions but different do NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260508-0020 · NTAP-20260508-0020
CVE-2026-271402026-04-08HIGH8.8SWIG file names containing 'cgo' and well-crafted payloads could lead to code smuggling and arbitrary code execution at build time due to trust layer bypass. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260424-0001
CVE-2026-271422026-03-06MEDIUM6.1Actions which insert URLs into the content attribute of HTML meta tags are not escaped. This can allow XSS if the meta tag also has an http-equiv attribute with NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260422-0006
CVE-2026-271432026-04-08CRITICAL9.8Arithmetic over induction variables in loops were not correctly checked for underflow or overflow. As a result, the compiler would allow for invalid indexing to NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260424-0001
CVE-2026-271442026-04-08HIGH7.1The compiler is meant to unwrap pointers which are the operands of a memory move; a no-op interface conversion prevented the compiler from making the correct de NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260424-0001
CVE-2026-283902026-04-07HIGH7.5Issue summary: During processing of a crafted CMS EnvelopedData message with KeyTransportRecipientInfo a NULL pointer dereference can happen. Impact summary: Ap NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260417-0012
CVE-2026-291672026-06-08CRITICAL9.8Use After Free vulnerability in Apache HTTP Server with mod_ldap in per-directory configuration This issue affects Apache HTTP Server: from 2.4.0 through 2.4.67 NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260610-0001
CVE-2026-314022026-04-03CRITICAL9.8In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: fix heap overflow in NFSv4.0 LOCK replay cache The NFSv4.0 replay cache uses a fixed 1 NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260417-0008
CVE-2026-322802026-04-08HIGH7.5During chain building, the amount of work that is done is not correctly limited when a large number of intermediate certificates are passed in VerifyOptions.Int NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260424-0001
CVE-2026-322812026-04-08HIGH7.5Validating certificate chains which use policies is unexpectedly inefficient when certificates in the chain contain a very large number of policy mappings, poss NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260424-0001
CVE-2026-322822026-04-08MEDIUM6.4On Linux, if the target of Root.Chmod is replaced with a symlink while the chmod operation is in progress, Chmod can operate on the target of the symlink, even NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260424-0001
CVE-2026-322832026-04-08HIGH7.5If one side of the TLS connection sends multiple key update messages post-handshake in a single record, the connection can deadlock, causing uncontrolled consum NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260424-0001
CVE-2026-322882026-04-08MEDIUM5.5tar.Reader can allocate an unbounded amount of memory when reading a maliciously-crafted archive containing a large number of sparse regions encoded in the "old NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260424-0001
CVE-2026-322892026-04-08MEDIUM6.1Context was not properly tracked across template branches for JS template literals, leading to possibly incorrect escaping of content when branches were used. A NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260424-0001
CVE-2026-331862026-03-20CRITICAL9.1gRPC-Go is the Go language implementation of gRPC. Versions prior to 1.79.3 have an authorization bypass resulting from improper input validation of the HTTP/2 NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260422-0005 · NTAP-20260422-0005
CVE-2026-338452026-04-30HIGH7.5A flaw in GnuTLS DTLS handshake parsing allows malformed fragments with zero length and non-zero offset, leading to an integer underflow during reassembly and r NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260724-0002
CVE-2026-338462026-05-04HIGH7.5A heap buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the DTLS handshake fragment reassembly logic of GnuTLS. The issue arises in merge_handshake_packet() where incomi NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260724-0002
CVE-2026-341802026-06-09HIGH7.5Issue summary: Parsing a crafted DER-encoded ASN.1 structure with a primitive element whose content exceeds 2 gigabytes in length may cause a heap buffer over-r NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260617-0009
CVE-2026-341812026-06-09HIGH7.4Issue Summary: The PKCS#12 file processing fails to perform sufficient input validation for files that use Password-Based Message Authentication Code 1 (PBMAC1) NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260617-0010
CVE-2026-341822026-06-09CRITICAL9.1Issue Summary: Cryptographic Message Services (CMS) processing fails to perform sufficient input validation on the cipher and tag length fields of AuthEnveloped NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260617-0001
CVE-2026-343552026-06-08HIGH7.5A buffer overflow in mod_proxy_html in Apache HTTP Server 2.4.67 and earlier allows an attack by an untrusted backend. Users are recommended to upgrade to versi NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260610-0001
CVE-2026-343562026-06-08HIGH7.5Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Apache HTTP Server with malicious backend servers and ProxyPassReverseCookie* This issue affects Apache HTTP Server: NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260610-0001
CVE-2026-351882026-06-09MEDIUM5.0Issue summary: A malicious server can exploit TLS OCSP stapling by delivering a crafted response through the status_request extension, triggering a double-free NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260617-0015
CVE-2026-353852026-04-02HIGH7.5In OpenSSH before 10.3, a file downloaded by scp may be installed setuid or setgid, an outcome contrary to some users' expectations, if the download is performe NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260417-0018
CVE-2026-354142026-04-02MEDIUM4.2OpenSSH before 10.3 mishandles the authorized_keys principals option in uncommon scenarios involving a principals list in conjunction with a Certificate Authori NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260417-0019
CVE-2026-355472026-04-30HIGH8.1When processing the header of an incoming message, libnv failed to properly validate the message size. The lack of validation allows a malicious program to writ NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260501-0002
CVE-2026-37832026-03-11MEDIUM5.3When an OAuth2 bearer token is used for an HTTP(S) transfer, and that transfer performs a redirect to a second URL, curl could leak that token to the second hos NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260327-0004
CVE-2026-37842026-03-11MEDIUM6.5curl would wrongly reuse an existing HTTP proxy connection doing CONNECT to a server, even if the new request uses different credentials for the HTTP proxy. The NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260327-0003
CVE-2026-38052026-03-11HIGH7.5When doing a second SMB request to the same host again, curl would wrongly use a data pointer pointing into already freed memory. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260327-0001
CVE-2026-38332026-04-30MEDIUM6.5A flaw was found in gnutls. This vulnerability occurs because gnutls performs case-sensitive comparisons of `nameConstraints` labels, specifically for `dNSName` NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260724-0002
CVE-2026-40462026-03-30HIGH7.5The iconv() function in the GNU C Library versions 2.43 and earlier may crash due to an assertion failure when converting inputs from the IBM1390 or IBM1399 cha NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260422-0003
CVE-2026-425112026-04-30HIGH8.1The BOOTP file field is written to the lease file without escaping embedded double-quotes, allowing injection of arbitrary dhclient.conf directives. When the le NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260501-0005
CVE-2026-425122026-04-30HIGH8.1As dhclient is building an environment to pass to dhclient-script, it may need to resize the array of string pointers. The code which expands the array incorrec NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260501-0006
CVE-2026-425362026-06-08HIGH7.5Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Apache HTTP Server with mod_xml2enc, xml2StartParse, and untrusted content This issue affects Apache HTTP Server: fr NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260610-0001
CVE-2026-427642026-06-09HIGH7.5Issue summary: Receiving a QUIC initial packet with an invalid token may trigger a NULL pointer dereference in the OpenSSL QUIC server with address validation d NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260617-0004 · NTAP-20260617-0004
CVE-2026-427652026-06-09HIGH7.5Issue summary: When a partial-chain certificate verification is enabled together with OCSP response checking for the whole chain, a NULL dereference will happen NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260617-0005
CVE-2026-427662026-06-09MEDIUM5.9Issue summary: A specially crafted password-encrypted CMS message can trigger a NULL pointer dereference during CMS decryption. Impact summary: This NULL pointe NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260617-0013
CVE-2026-427672026-06-09MEDIUM5.9Issue summary: An attacker-controlled CMP (Certificate Management Protocol) server could trigger a NULL pointer dereference in a CMP client application. Impact NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260617-0012
CVE-2026-427682026-06-09LOW3.7Issue summary: The CMS_decrypt and PKCS7_decrypt functions are vulnerable to Bleichenbacher-style attack when an attacker is able to provide the CMS or S/MIME m NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260617-0017
CVE-2026-427692026-06-09MEDIUM5.3Issue Summary: An error in the callback used to verify the certificate provided in a Root CA key update Certificate Management Protocol (CMP) message response r NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260617-0014
CVE-2026-427702026-06-09LOW3.7Issue summary: When EVP_PKEY_derive_set_peer() is called with a DHX (X9.42) peer key, the peer key is not properly checked for the subgroup membership. Impact s NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260617-0018
CVE-2026-427712026-06-09MEDIUM6.2Issue summary: When the X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_email is called by an application to validate a crafted e-mail address, such as during S/MIME message validation, NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260617-0011
CVE-2026-439512026-06-08MEDIUM6.5Out-of-bounds Read vulnerability in Apache HTTP Server with mod_headers and mod_mime and multiple response languages. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server: fro NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260610-0001
CVE-2026-441192026-06-08MEDIUM5.5Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in Apache HTTP Server 2.4.67 and earlier allows local .htaccess authors to read files with the privileges of the htt NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260610-0001
CVE-2026-441852026-06-08HIGH7.3Buffer Over-read vulnerability in Apache HTTP Server via outbound OCSP requests to an attacker controlled OCSP server This issue affects Apache HTTP Server: fro NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260610-0001
CVE-2026-441862026-06-08HIGH7.3Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') vulnerability in the mod_proxy_ftp module in Apache HTTP Server with an attacker controlled backend FTP s NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260610-0001
CVE-2026-446312026-06-08CRITICAL9.8Buffer Underwrite vulnerability in Apache HTTP Server on crafted regular expressions in the configuration. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server: from 2.4.0 thr NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260610-0001
CVE-2026-454452026-06-09HIGH7.5Issue summary: When an application drives an AES-OCB context through the public EVP_Cipher() one-shot interface, the application-supplied initialisation vector NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260617-0007
CVE-2026-454462026-06-09MEDIUM4.8Issue summary: The implementations of AES-SIV (RFC 5297) and AES-GCM-SIV (RFC 8452) mishandle the authentication of AAD (Additional Authenticated Data) with an NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260617-0016
CVE-2026-454472026-06-09HIGH8.8Issue summary: A specially crafted PKCS#7 or S/MIME signed message could trigger a use-after-free during PKCS#7 signature verification. Impact summary: A use-af NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260617-0002
CVE-2026-480952026-06-05HIGH8.87-Zip is a file archiver with a high compression ratio. Versions 26.00 and prior contain a heap buffer overflow vulnerability caused by an under-allocation in t NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260619-0001
CVE-2026-497592026-06-10HIGH8.2Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Erlang OTP erts (inet_drv) allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash the BEAM VM by sending a crafted SCTP NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260626-0014
CVE-2026-552002026-06-17HIGH8.1libssh2 through 1.11.1, fixed in commit 7acf3df contains an out-of-bounds write vulnerability in ssh2_transport_read() that fails to enforce upper bounds on pac NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260703-0020 · NTAP-20260703-0020
CVE-2026-59462026-05-20HIGH7.5Multiple flaws have been identified in `named` related to the handling of DNS messages whose CLASS is not Internet (`IN`) — for example, `CHAOS` or `HESIOD`, or NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260529-0002
CVE-2026-599952026-07-08MEDIUM4.2sftp in OpenSSH before 10.4 does not properly constrain the location of downloaded files when "sftp server:/path ." is used with an attacker-controlled server. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260717-0012
CVE-2026-599962026-07-08MEDIUM4.2scp in OpenSSH before 10.4 may place a file in the parent directory of an intended directory when the copy occurs between two remote destinations. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260717-0012
CVE-2026-599972026-07-08MEDIUM4.2internal-sftp in sshd in OpenSSH before 10.4 recognizes only the first 9 command-line arguments, which can be important if a later command-line argument would h NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260717-0012
CVE-2026-599982026-07-08MEDIUM4.8sshd in OpenSSH before 10.4 has an undocumented security-relevant behavior: GSSAPIStrictAcceptorCheck has no value if the server is in Windows Active Directory. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260717-0012
CVE-2026-599992026-07-08MEDIUM5.9In sshd in OpenSSH before 10.4, DisableForwarding=yes was supposed to take precedence over PermitTunnel=yes, but did not. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260717-0012
CVE-2026-600002026-07-08LOW3.7sshd in OpenSSH before 10.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource consumption from excessive authentication attempts) because MaxAuthTr NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260717-0012
CVE-2026-600012026-07-08MEDIUM6.5sshd in OpenSSH before 10.4 does not always honor the minimum authentication delay. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260717-0012
CVE-2026-600022026-07-08HIGH7.7ssh in OpenSSH before 10.4 can have a use-after-free when a server changes its host key during a key re-exchange. (This outcome occurs only on the client side.) NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260717-0012
CVE-2026-660322026-07-24HIGH8.8libssh2 through 1.11.1, fixed in commit 5e47761, contains a double-free vulnerability in the sftp_open() function in src/sftp.c that allows a malicious SSH serv NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260807-0001
CVE-2026-660332026-07-24HIGH7.5libssh2 through 1.11.1, fixed in commit a2ed82d, contains a pre-authentication integer underflow vulnerability in the ssh2_cipher_crypt() function in src/openss NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260807-0002
CVE-2026-75982026-05-01HIGH7.3A security vulnerability has been detected in libssh2 up to 1.11.1. The impacted element is the function userauth_password of the file src/userauth.c. Such mani NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260814-0020
CVE-2026-90762026-06-09HIGH7.5Issue summary: When CMS password-based decryption (RFC 3211 / PWRI key unwrap) processes attacker-supplied CMS data, an attacker-chosen stream-mode KEK cipher c NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260617-0008

← Security hub