Home / Security / CVE index / 2021
2021 NetApp CVEs
Showing 300 CVEs with a 2021 identifier — page 1 of 4. Sorted by CVE id.
Always verify. NetApp's advisory is authoritative for affected versions and fixes; NVD carries the CVSS record.
Showing 300 of 300
| CVE | Published | Severity | CVSS | Summary / Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2021-0002 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210827-0008 |
CVE-2021-0003 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210827-0008 |
CVE-2021-0004 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210827-0009 |
CVE-2021-0005 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210827-0009 |
CVE-2021-0006 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210827-0009 |
CVE-2021-0007 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210827-0009 |
CVE-2021-0008 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210827-0009 |
CVE-2021-0009 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210827-0009 |
CVE-2021-0051 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210716-0001 |
CVE-2021-0060 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0005 |
CVE-2021-0084 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210827-0008 |
CVE-2021-0091 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0007 |
CVE-2021-0092 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0007 |
CVE-2021-0093 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0007 |
CVE-2021-0095 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210625-0009 |
CVE-2021-0099 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0007 |
CVE-2021-0103 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0007 |
CVE-2021-0107 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0007 |
CVE-2021-0111 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0007 |
CVE-2021-0114 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0007 |
CVE-2021-0115 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0007 |
CVE-2021-0116 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0007 |
CVE-2021-0117 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0007 |
CVE-2021-0118 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0007 |
CVE-2021-0119 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0007 |
CVE-2021-0124 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0007 |
CVE-2021-0125 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0007 |
CVE-2021-0127 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0008 |
CVE-2021-0129 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210716-0002 |
CVE-2021-0145 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0009 |
CVE-2021-0146 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211210-0006 |
CVE-2021-0153 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220818-0003 |
CVE-2021-0154 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220818-0003 |
CVE-2021-0155 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220818-0003 |
CVE-2021-0156 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0007 |
CVE-2021-0157 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211112-0004 |
CVE-2021-0158 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211112-0004 |
CVE-2021-0159 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220818-0003 |
CVE-2021-0187 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230302-0011 |
CVE-2021-0188 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220818-0003 |
CVE-2021-0189 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220818-0003 |
CVE-2021-0190 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220818-0003 |
CVE-2021-0197 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211210-0004 |
CVE-2021-0198 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211210-0004 |
CVE-2021-0199 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211210-0004 |
CVE-2021-0200 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211210-0004 |
CVE-2021-1998 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0003 |
CVE-2021-2001 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0003 |
CVE-2021-2002 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0003 |
CVE-2021-2006 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210622-0001 |
CVE-2021-2007 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210622-0001 |
CVE-2021-20086 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241108-0002 |
CVE-2021-2009 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0003 |
CVE-2021-2010 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210622-0001 |
CVE-2021-2011 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210622-0001 |
CVE-2021-2012 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0003 |
CVE-2021-2014 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0003 |
CVE-2021-2016 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0003 |
CVE-2021-20181 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210720-0009 |
CVE-2021-2019 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0003 |
CVE-2021-20190 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0008 |
CVE-2021-20194 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210326-0003 |
CVE-2021-20196 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210708-0004 |
CVE-2021-20197 | 2021-03-26 | MEDIUM | 6.3 | There is an open race window when writing output in the following utilities in GNU binutils version 2.35 and earlier:ar, objcopy, strip, ranlib. When these util NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210528-0009 |
CVE-2021-2020 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0003 |
CVE-2021-2021 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0003 |
CVE-2021-2022 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0003 |
CVE-2021-20220 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0013 |
CVE-2021-20221 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210708-0005 |
CVE-2021-20225 | 2021-03-03 | MEDIUM | 6.7 | A flaw was found in grub2 in versions prior to 2.06. The option parser allows an attacker to write past the end of a heap-allocated buffer by calling certain co NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220325-0001 |
CVE-2021-20226 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210401-0001 |
CVE-2021-20227 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210423-0010 |
CVE-2021-20229 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210326-0005 |
CVE-2021-20231 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210416-0005 |
CVE-2021-20232 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210416-0005 |
CVE-2021-20233 | 2021-03-03 | HIGH | 8.2 | A flaw was found in grub2 in versions prior to 2.06. Setparam_prefix() in the menu rendering code performs a length calculation on the assumption that expressin NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220325-0001 |
CVE-2021-2024 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0003 |
CVE-2021-20251 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230331-0005 |
CVE-2021-20254 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210430-0001 |
CVE-2021-20255 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210507-0003 |
CVE-2021-20257 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220425-0003 |
CVE-2021-20263 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210507-0002 |
CVE-2021-20266 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260612-0019 |
CVE-2021-20268 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210409-0006 |
CVE-2021-20277 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210326-0007 |
CVE-2021-2028 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0003 |
CVE-2021-20284 | 2021-03-26 | MEDIUM | 5.5 | A flaw was found in GNU Binutils 2.35.1, where there is a heap-based buffer overflow in _bfd_elf_slurp_secondary_reloc_section in elf.c due to the number of sym NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210521-0010 |
CVE-2021-20289 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210528-0008 |
CVE-2021-20293 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210727-0005 |
CVE-2021-20295 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220519-0003 |
CVE-2021-2030 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0003 |
CVE-2021-20305 | 2021-04-05 | HIGH | 8.1 | A flaw was found in Nettle in versions before 3.7.2, where several Nettle signature verification functions (GOST DSA, EDDSA & ECDSA) result in the Elliptic Curv NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0002 |
CVE-2021-2031 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0003 |
CVE-2021-20316 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220110-0002 |
CVE-2021-2032 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0003 |
CVE-2021-20322 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220303-0002 |
CVE-2021-2036 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0003 |
CVE-2021-20373 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220225-0005 |
CVE-2021-2038 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0003 |
CVE-2021-2042 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0003 |
CVE-2021-2046 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0003 |
CVE-2021-20461 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210720-0007 |
CVE-2021-20464 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220602-0003 |
CVE-2021-20468 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221014-0005 |
CVE-2021-20470 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211223-0006 |
CVE-2021-2048 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0003 |
CVE-2021-20493 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211223-0006 |
CVE-2021-2055 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0003 |
CVE-2021-2056 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0003 |
CVE-2021-20579 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210720-0006 |
CVE-2021-2058 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0003 |
CVE-2021-2060 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0003 |
CVE-2021-2061 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0003 |
CVE-2021-2065 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0003 |
CVE-2021-2070 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0003 |
CVE-2021-2072 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0003 |
CVE-2021-2076 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0003 |
CVE-2021-2081 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0003 |
CVE-2021-2087 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0003 |
CVE-2021-2088 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0003 |
CVE-2021-2122 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0003 |
CVE-2021-21252 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0005 |
CVE-2021-21267 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210528-0006 |
CVE-2021-21284 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210226-0005 |
CVE-2021-21285 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210226-0005 |
CVE-2021-21290 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0011 |
CVE-2021-21295 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210604-0003 |
CVE-2021-21315 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210312-0007 |
CVE-2021-21341 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210430-0002 |
CVE-2021-21342 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210430-0002 |
CVE-2021-21343 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210430-0002 |
CVE-2021-21344 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210430-0002 |
CVE-2021-21345 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210430-0002 |
CVE-2021-21346 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210430-0002 |
CVE-2021-21347 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210430-0002 |
CVE-2021-21348 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210430-0002 |
CVE-2021-21349 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210430-0002 |
CVE-2021-21350 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210430-0002 |
CVE-2021-21351 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210430-0002 |
CVE-2021-21409 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210604-0003 |
CVE-2021-21414 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210618-0003 |
CVE-2021-2144 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-2146 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-2154 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-2160 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-2161 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0001 |
CVE-2021-2162 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-2163 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0001 |
CVE-2021-2164 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-2166 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-2169 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-2170 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-21702 | 2021-02-15 | MEDIUM | 5.3 | In PHP versions 7.3.x below 7.3.27, 7.4.x below 7.4.15 and 8.0.x below 8.0.2, when using SOAP extension to connect to a SOAP server, a malicious SOAP server cou NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210312-0005 |
CVE-2021-21703 | 2021-10-25 | HIGH | 7.8 | In PHP versions 7.3.x up to and including 7.3.31, 7.4.x below 7.4.25 and 8.0.x below 8.0.12, when running PHP FPM SAPI with main FPM daemon process running as r NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211118-0003 |
CVE-2021-21704 | 2021-10-04 | MEDIUM | 5.0 | In PHP versions 7.3.x below 7.3.29, 7.4.x below 7.4.21 and 8.0.x below 8.0.8, when using Firebird PDO driver extension, a malicious database server could cause NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211029-0006 |
CVE-2021-21705 | 2021-10-04 | MEDIUM | 4.3 | In PHP versions 7.3.x below 7.3.29, 7.4.x below 7.4.21 and 8.0.x below 8.0.8, when using URL validation functionality via filter_var() function with FILTER_VALI NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211029-0006 |
CVE-2021-21706 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211029-0007 |
CVE-2021-21707 | 2021-11-29 | MEDIUM | 5.3 | In PHP versions 7.3.x below 7.3.33, 7.4.x below 7.4.26 and 8.0.x below 8.0.13, certain XML parsing functions, like simplexml_load_file(), URL-decode the filenam NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211223-0005 |
CVE-2021-21708 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220325-0004 |
CVE-2021-2171 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-2172 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-2174 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-2178 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-2179 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-2180 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-2193 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-2194 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-2196 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-2201 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-2202 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-2203 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-22060 | 2022-01-10 | MEDIUM | 4.3 | In Spring Framework versions 5.3.0 - 5.3.13, 5.2.0 - 5.2.18, and older unsupported versions, it is possible for a user to provide malicious input to cause the i NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220131-0001 |
CVE-2021-2208 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-22096 | 2021-10-28 | MEDIUM | 4.3 | In Spring Framework versions 5.3.0 - 5.3.10, 5.2.0 - 5.2.17, and older unsupported versions, it is possible for a user to provide malicious input to cause the i NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211125-0005 |
CVE-2021-22118 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210713-0005 |
CVE-2021-2212 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-2213 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-22132 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0004 |
CVE-2021-22134 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210430-0006 |
CVE-2021-22135 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210625-0003 |
CVE-2021-22137 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210625-0003 |
CVE-2021-22138 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210629-0001 |
CVE-2021-22144 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210827-0006 |
CVE-2021-22145 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210827-0006 |
CVE-2021-22146 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210819-0005 |
CVE-2021-22147 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211008-0002 |
CVE-2021-2215 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-2217 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-2226 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-2230 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-2232 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-22543 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210708-0002 |
CVE-2021-22555 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210805-0010 |
CVE-2021-22570 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220429-0005 |
CVE-2021-22600 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230110-0002 |
CVE-2021-22696 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220204-0002 |
CVE-2021-2278 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-22876 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210521-0007 |
CVE-2021-22880 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210805-0009 |
CVE-2021-22883 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210416-0001 |
CVE-2021-22884 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0001 · NTAP-20210416-0001 |
CVE-2021-22885 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210805-0009 |
CVE-2021-22890 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210521-0007 |
CVE-2021-22897 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210727-0007 |
CVE-2021-22898 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260327-0007 |
CVE-2021-22901 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210727-0007 · NTAP-20210723-0001 |
CVE-2021-22904 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210805-0009 |
CVE-2021-22918 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210805-0003 |
CVE-2021-22921 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210805-0003 |
CVE-2021-22922 | 2021-08-05 | MEDIUM | 6.5 | When curl is instructed to download content using the metalink feature, thecontents is verified against a hash provided in the metalink XML file.The metalink XM NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210902-0003 |
CVE-2021-22923 | 2021-08-05 | MEDIUM | 5.3 | When curl is instructed to get content using the metalink feature, and a user name and password are used to download the metalink XML file, those same credentia NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210902-0003 |
CVE-2021-22924 | 2021-08-05 | LOW | 3.7 | libcurl keeps previously used connections in a connection pool for subsequenttransfers to reuse, if one of them matches the setup.Due to errors in the logic, th NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210902-0003 |
CVE-2021-22925 | 2021-08-05 | MEDIUM | 5.3 | curl supports the `-t` command line option, known as `CURLOPT_TELNETOPTIONS`in libcurl. This rarely used option is used to send variable=content pairs toTELNET NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210902-0003 |
CVE-2021-22926 | 2021-08-05 | HIGH | 7.5 | libcurl-using applications can ask for a specific client certificate to be used in a transfer. This is done with the `CURLOPT_SSLCERT` option (`--cert` with the NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 · NTAP-20210902-0003 |
CVE-2021-2293 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-22930 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211112-0002 |
CVE-2021-22931 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 · NTAP-20210923-0001 |
CVE-2021-22939 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210917-0003 |
CVE-2021-22940 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210923-0001 |
CVE-2021-22942 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240202-0005 |
CVE-2021-22945 | 2021-09-23 | CRITICAL | 9.1 | When sending data to an MQTT server, libcurl <= 7.73.0 and 7.78.0 could in some circumstances erroneously keep a pointer to an already freed memory area and bot NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211029-0003 |
CVE-2021-22946 | 2021-09-29 | HIGH | 7.5 | A user can tell curl >= 7.20.0 and <= 7.78.0 to require a successful upgrade to TLS when speaking to an IMAP, POP3 or FTP server (`--ssl-reqd` on the command li NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0008 · NTAP-20211029-0003 |
CVE-2021-22947 | 2021-09-29 | MEDIUM | 5.9 | When curl >= 7.20.0 and <= 7.78.0 connects to an IMAP or POP3 server to retrieve data using STARTTLS to upgrade to TLS security, the server can respond and send NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211029-0003 |
CVE-2021-2298 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-2299 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-2300 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-2301 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-23017 | 2021-06-01 | HIGH | 7.7 | A security issue in nginx resolver was identified, which might allow an attacker who is able to forge UDP packets from the DNS server to cause 1-byte memory ove NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210708-0006 |
CVE-2021-2304 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-2305 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-23055 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220812-0001 |
CVE-2021-2307 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-2308 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 |
CVE-2021-23133 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210611-0008 |
CVE-2021-23134 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210625-0007 |
CVE-2021-23192 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211206-0001 |
CVE-2021-23239 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210129-0010 |
CVE-2021-23240 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210129-0010 |
CVE-2021-23336 | 2021-02-15 | MEDIUM | 5.9 | The package python/cpython from 0 and before 3.6.13, from 3.7.0 and before 3.7.10, from 3.8.0 and before 3.8.8, from 3.9.0 and before 3.9.2 are vulnerable to We NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210326-0004 |
CVE-2021-23337 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210312-0006 |
CVE-2021-23358 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241108-0002 · NTAP-20240808-0003 |
CVE-2021-23369 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210604-0008 |
CVE-2021-23383 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210618-0007 |
CVE-2021-2339 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0001 |
CVE-2021-2340 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0001 |
CVE-2021-2341 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0002 |
CVE-2021-2342 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0001 |
CVE-2021-23445 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006 |
CVE-2021-23449 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211029-0010 |
CVE-2021-23463 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230818-0010 |
CVE-2021-2352 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0001 |
CVE-2021-2354 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0001 |
CVE-2021-2356 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0001 |
CVE-2021-2357 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0001 |
CVE-2021-2367 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0001 |
CVE-2021-2369 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0002 |
CVE-2021-2370 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0001 |
CVE-2021-23718 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211203-0005 |
CVE-2021-2372 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0001 |
CVE-2021-23732 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211223-0004 |
CVE-2021-2374 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0001 |
CVE-2021-2383 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0001 |
CVE-2021-23839 | 2021-02-16 | LOW | 3.7 | OpenSSL 1.0.2 supports SSLv2. If a client attempts to negotiate SSLv2 with a server that is configured to support both SSLv2 and more recent SSL and TLS version NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006 · NTAP-20210219-0009 |
CVE-2021-2384 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0001 |
CVE-2021-23840 | 2021-02-16 | HIGH | 7.5 | Calls to EVP_CipherUpdate, EVP_EncryptUpdate and EVP_DecryptUpdate may overflow the output length argument in some cases where the input length is close to the NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006 · NTAP-20210219-0009 |
CVE-2021-23841 | 2021-02-16 | MEDIUM | 5.9 | The OpenSSL public API function X509_issuer_and_serial_hash() attempts to create a unique hash value based on the issuer and serial number data contained within NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006 · NTAP-20210513-0002 +1 |
CVE-2021-2385 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0001 |
CVE-2021-2387 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0001 |
CVE-2021-2388 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0002 |
CVE-2021-2389 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0001 |
CVE-2021-2390 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0001 |
CVE-2021-23901 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0003 |
CVE-2021-23926 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0004 |
CVE-2021-2399 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0001 |
CVE-2021-2402 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0001 |
CVE-2021-2410 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0001 |
CVE-2021-2411 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0001 |
CVE-2021-2412 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0001 |
CVE-2021-24122 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210212-0008 |
CVE-2021-2417 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0001 |
CVE-2021-2418 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0001 |
CVE-2021-2422 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0001 |
CVE-2021-2424 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0001 |
CVE-2021-2425 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0001 |
CVE-2021-2426 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0001 |
CVE-2021-2427 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0001 |
CVE-2021-2429 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0001 |
CVE-2021-2432 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0002 |
CVE-2021-2437 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0001 |
CVE-2021-2440 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0001 |
CVE-2021-2441 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0001 |
CVE-2021-2444 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0001 |
CVE-2021-2478 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-2479 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-2481 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-25122 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210409-0002 |
CVE-2021-25214 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210521-0006 |
CVE-2021-25215 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210521-0006 |
CVE-2021-25216 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210521-0006 |
CVE-2021-25217 | 2021-05-26 | HIGH | 7.4 | In ISC DHCP 4.1-ESV-R1 -> 4.1-ESV-R16, ISC DHCP 4.4.0 -> 4.4.2 (Other branches of ISC DHCP (i.e., releases in the 4.0.x series or lower and releases in the 4.3. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220325-0011 |
Years: 2026 · 2025 · 2024 · 2023 · 2022 · 2021 · 2020 · 2019 · 2018 · 2017 · 2016 · 2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 1999