Home / Security / CVE index / 2021
2021 NetApp CVEs (page 3)
Showing 300 CVEs with a 2021 identifier — page 3 of 4. Sorted by CVE id.
Always verify. NetApp's advisory is authoritative for affected versions and fixes; NVD carries the CVSS record.
Showing 300 of 300
| CVE | Published | Severity | CVSS | Summary / Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2021-35597 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0005 |
CVE-2021-35598 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-35602 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-35603 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006 · NTAP-20211022-0004 |
CVE-2021-35604 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-35607 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-35608 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-35610 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-35612 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-35613 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-35618 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-35621 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-35622 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-35623 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-35624 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-35625 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-35626 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-35627 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-35628 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-35629 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-35630 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-35631 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-35632 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-35633 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-35634 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-35635 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-35636 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-35637 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-35638 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-35639 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-35640 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-35641 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-35642 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-35643 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-35644 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-35645 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-35646 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-35647 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-35648 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-3572 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006 |
CVE-2021-3580 | 2021-08-05 | HIGH | 7.5 | A flaw was found in the way nettle's RSA decryption functions handled specially crafted ciphertext. An attacker could use this flaw to provide a manipulated cip NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211104-0006 |
CVE-2021-3582 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220429-0003 |
CVE-2021-3592 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210805-0004 |
CVE-2021-3593 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210805-0004 |
CVE-2021-35937 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260612-0015 |
CVE-2021-35938 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260612-0017 |
CVE-2021-35939 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260612-0016 |
CVE-2021-3594 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210805-0004 |
CVE-2021-35942 | 2021-07-22 | CRITICAL | 9.1 | The wordexp function in the GNU C Library (aka glibc) through 2.33 may crash or read arbitrary memory in parse_param (in posix/wordexp.c) when called with an un NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210827-0005 |
CVE-2021-3595 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210805-0004 |
CVE-2021-3597 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220804-0003 |
CVE-2021-3607 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220318-0002 |
CVE-2021-3608 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220318-0002 |
CVE-2021-36084 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250207-0004 |
CVE-2021-36085 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250207-0004 |
CVE-2021-36086 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250207-0004 |
CVE-2021-36087 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250207-0004 |
CVE-2021-3609 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220419-0004 |
CVE-2021-36090 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0001 |
CVE-2021-3611 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220624-0001 |
CVE-2021-3612 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210805-0005 |
CVE-2021-36160 | 2021-09-16 | HIGH | 7.5 | A carefully crafted request uri-path can cause mod_proxy_uwsgi to read above the allocated memory and crash (DoS). This issue affects Apache HTTP Server version NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211008-0004 |
CVE-2021-36222 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211104-0007 · NTAP-20211022-0003 |
CVE-2021-3629 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0008 |
CVE-2021-3631 | 2022-03-02 | MEDIUM | 6.3 | A flaw was found in libvirt while it generates SELinux MCS category pairs for VMs' dynamic labels. This flaw allows one exploited guest to access files labeled NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220331-0010 |
CVE-2021-3634 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211004-0003 |
CVE-2021-36368 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250919-0002 |
CVE-2021-36373 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210819-0007 |
CVE-2021-36374 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210819-0007 |
CVE-2021-3638 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220407-0003 |
CVE-2021-3640 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220419-0003 |
CVE-2021-3658 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220407-0002 |
CVE-2021-3667 | 2022-03-02 | MEDIUM | 6.5 | An improper locking issue was found in the virStoragePoolLookupByTargetPath API of libvirt. It occurs in the storagePoolLookupByTargetPath function where a lock NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220331-0005 |
CVE-2021-3671 | 2021-10-12 | MEDIUM | 6.5 | A null pointer de-reference was found in the way samba kerberos server handled missing sname in TGS-REQ (Ticket Granting Server - Request). An authenticated use NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230216-0008 · NTAP-20221215-0002 |
CVE-2021-36713 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230406-0003 |
CVE-2021-3677 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220407-0008 |
CVE-2021-36770 | 2021-08-11 | HIGH | 7.8 | Encode.pm, as distributed in Perl through 5.34.0, allows local users to gain privileges via a Trojan horse Encode::ConfigLocal library (in the current working d NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241108-0002 · NTAP-20210909-0003 |
CVE-2021-3682 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210902-0006 |
CVE-2021-3690 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0021 |
CVE-2021-3695 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220930-0001 |
CVE-2021-3696 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220930-0001 |
CVE-2021-3697 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220930-0001 |
CVE-2021-3711 | 2021-08-24 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | In order to decrypt SM2 encrypted data an application is expected to call the API function EVP_PKEY_decrypt(). Typically an application will call this function NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006 · NTAP-20211022-0003 +1 |
CVE-2021-3712 | 2021-08-24 | HIGH | 7.4 | ASN.1 strings are represented internally within OpenSSL as an ASN1_STRING structure which contains a buffer holding the string data and a field holding the buff NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006 · NTAP-20210827-0010 |
CVE-2021-3713 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210923-0006 |
CVE-2021-37136 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0012 |
CVE-2021-37137 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0012 |
CVE-2021-3715 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211203-0003 |
CVE-2021-37159 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210819-0003 |
CVE-2021-3717 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220804-0002 |
CVE-2021-3733 | 2022-03-10 | MEDIUM | 6.5 | There's a flaw in urllib's AbstractBasicAuthHandler class. An attacker who controls a malicious HTTP server that an HTTP client (such as web browser) connects t NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220407-0001 |
CVE-2021-3735 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250228-0009 |
CVE-2021-3737 | 2022-03-04 | HIGH | 7.5 | A flaw was found in python. An improperly handled HTTP response in the HTTP client code of python may allow a remote attacker, who controls the HTTP server, to NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220407-0009 |
CVE-2021-3738 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211206-0001 |
CVE-2021-3739 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220407-0006 |
CVE-2021-37404 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220715-0007 |
CVE-2021-3743 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220407-0007 |
CVE-2021-3748 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220425-0004 |
CVE-2021-3749 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250829-0009 |
CVE-2021-3750 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220624-0003 |
CVE-2021-3752 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220318-0009 |
CVE-2021-3753 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0003 |
CVE-2021-37576 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210917-0005 |
CVE-2021-3760 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220318-0007 |
CVE-2021-37600 | 2021-07-30 | MEDIUM | 5.5 | An integer overflow in util-linux through 2.37.1 can potentially cause a buffer overflow if an attacker were able to use system resources in a way that leads to NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210902-0002 |
CVE-2021-3770 | 2021-09-06 | HIGH | 7.8 | vim is vulnerable to Heap-based Buffer Overflow NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221124-0003 |
CVE-2021-37714 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0022 |
CVE-2021-3772 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221007-0001 |
CVE-2021-3773 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250328-0004 |
CVE-2021-37750 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210923-0002 |
CVE-2021-3778 | 2021-09-15 | HIGH | 7.8 | vim is vulnerable to Heap-based Buffer Overflow NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221118-0003 |
CVE-2021-3796 | 2021-09-15 | HIGH | 7.3 | vim is vulnerable to Use After Free NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221118-0004 |
CVE-2021-3800 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221028-0004 |
CVE-2021-3807 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221014-0002 |
CVE-2021-38160 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210902-0010 |
CVE-2021-38166 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210909-0001 |
CVE-2021-38199 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210902-0010 |
CVE-2021-38201 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210902-0010 |
CVE-2021-38202 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210902-0010 |
CVE-2021-38203 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210902-0010 |
CVE-2021-38207 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210902-0007 |
CVE-2021-38297 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211118-0006 |
CVE-2021-38300 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211008-0003 |
CVE-2021-3859 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221201-0004 |
CVE-2021-38604 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210909-0005 |
CVE-2021-38886 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220602-0003 |
CVE-2021-38903 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220602-0003 |
CVE-2021-38904 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220602-0003 |
CVE-2021-38905 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220602-0003 |
CVE-2021-38909 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211223-0006 |
CVE-2021-38926 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220114-0002 |
CVE-2021-38931 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220114-0001 |
CVE-2021-38945 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0002 |
CVE-2021-38946 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220602-0003 |
CVE-2021-39002 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220114-0002 |
CVE-2021-39009 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221014-0005 |
CVE-2021-39036 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230622-0003 |
CVE-2021-39045 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221014-0005 |
CVE-2021-39047 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0002 |
CVE-2021-39139 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210923-0003 |
CVE-2021-39140 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210923-0003 |
CVE-2021-39141 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210923-0003 |
CVE-2021-39144 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210923-0003 |
CVE-2021-39145 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210923-0003 |
CVE-2021-39146 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210923-0003 |
CVE-2021-39147 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210923-0003 |
CVE-2021-39148 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210923-0003 |
CVE-2021-39149 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210923-0003 |
CVE-2021-39150 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210923-0003 |
CVE-2021-39151 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210923-0003 |
CVE-2021-39152 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210923-0003 |
CVE-2021-39153 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210923-0003 |
CVE-2021-39154 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210923-0003 |
CVE-2021-3918 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250117-0004 |
CVE-2021-39226 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211029-0008 |
CVE-2021-39275 | 2021-09-16 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | ap_escape_quotes() may write beyond the end of a buffer when given malicious input. No included modules pass untrusted data to these functions, but third-party NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211008-0004 |
CVE-2021-3929 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250228-0010 |
CVE-2021-39293 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220217-0009 |
CVE-2021-3930 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220225-0007 |
CVE-2021-3947 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220318-0003 |
CVE-2021-39537 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230427-0012 |
CVE-2021-3975 | 2022-08-23 | MEDIUM | 6.5 | A use-after-free flaw was found in libvirt. The qemuMonitorUnregister() function in qemuProcessHandleMonitorEOF is called using multiple threads without being a NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221201-0002 |
CVE-2021-3995 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221209-0002 |
CVE-2021-3996 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221209-0002 |
CVE-2021-3998 | 2022-08-24 | HIGH | 7.5 | A flaw was found in glibc. The realpath() function can mistakenly return an unexpected value, potentially leading to information leakage and disclosure of sensi NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221020-0003 |
CVE-2021-3999 | 2022-08-24 | HIGH | 7.8 | A flaw was found in glibc. An off-by-one buffer overflow and underflow in getcwd() may lead to memory corruption when the size of the buffer is exactly 1. A loc NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221104-0001 |
CVE-2021-4008 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220114-0004 |
CVE-2021-4009 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220114-0004 |
CVE-2021-4010 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220114-0004 |
CVE-2021-4011 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220114-0004 |
CVE-2021-4028 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221228-0002 |
CVE-2021-4034 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220128-0001 |
CVE-2021-40438 | 2021-09-16 | CRITICAL | 9.0 | A crafted request uri-path can cause mod_proxy to forward the request to an origin server choosen by the remote user. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211008-0004 |
CVE-2021-4044 | 2021-12-14 | HIGH | 7.5 | Internally libssl in OpenSSL calls X509_verify_cert() on the client side to verify a certificate supplied by a server. That function may return a negative retur NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211229-0003 |
CVE-2021-40490 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211004-0001 |
CVE-2021-40663 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220826-0002 |
CVE-2021-40690 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230818-0002 |
CVE-2021-4083 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220217-0005 |
CVE-2021-40839 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211008-0001 |
CVE-2021-4090 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220318-0010 |
CVE-2021-41035 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006 |
CVE-2021-4104 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211223-0007 |
CVE-2021-41073 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211014-0003 |
CVE-2021-41079 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211008-0005 |
CVE-2021-41090 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211229-0004 |
CVE-2021-41099 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211104-0003 |
CVE-2021-41174 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211125-0003 |
CVE-2021-41182 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211118-0004 |
CVE-2021-41183 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211118-0004 |
CVE-2021-41184 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211118-0004 |
CVE-2021-41229 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211203-0004 |
CVE-2021-41244 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211223-0001 |
CVE-2021-41303 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220609-0001 |
CVE-2021-4145 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220311-0004 |
CVE-2021-4147 | 2022-03-25 | MEDIUM | 6.5 | A flaw was found in the libvirt libxl driver. A malicious guest could continuously reboot itself and cause libvirtd on the host to deadlock or crash, resulting NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220513-0004 |
CVE-2021-41524 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211029-0009 |
CVE-2021-4154 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220225-0004 |
CVE-2021-4157 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220602-0007 |
CVE-2021-4160 | 2022-01-28 | MEDIUM | 5.9 | There is a carry propagation bug in the MIPS32 and MIPS64 squaring procedure. Many EC algorithms are affected, including some of the TLS 1.3 default curves. Imp NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006 · NTAP-20220204-0005 |
CVE-2021-41617 | 2021-09-26 | HIGH | 7.0 | sshd in OpenSSH 6.2 through 8.x before 8.8, when certain non-default configurations are used, allows privilege escalation because supplemental groups are not in NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211014-0004 |
CVE-2021-41771 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211210-0003 |
CVE-2021-41772 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211210-0003 |
CVE-2021-41773 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211029-0009 |
CVE-2021-41805 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211229-0007 |
CVE-2021-41816 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220303-0006 |
CVE-2021-41817 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220131-0002 |
CVE-2021-41819 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0003 |
CVE-2021-41837 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220222-0003 |
CVE-2021-41838 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220222-0001 |
CVE-2021-41839 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220217-0016 |
CVE-2021-41840 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220217-0014 |
CVE-2021-41841 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220217-0012 |
CVE-2021-41842 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220223-0002 |
CVE-2021-41864 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211029-0004 |
CVE-2021-4189 | 2022-08-24 | MEDIUM | 5.3 | A flaw was found in Python, specifically in the FTP (File Transfer Protocol) client library in PASV (passive) mode. The issue is how the FTP client trusts the h NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221104-0004 |
CVE-2021-4197 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220602-0006 |
CVE-2021-42008 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211104-0002 |
CVE-2021-42013 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211029-0009 |
CVE-2021-4202 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220513-0002 |
CVE-2021-4203 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221111-0003 |
CVE-2021-4204 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221228-0003 |
CVE-2021-42059 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220216-0008 |
CVE-2021-4206 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250321-0010 |
CVE-2021-42060 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220217-0015 |
CVE-2021-4207 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250321-0009 |
CVE-2021-4209 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220915-0005 |
CVE-2021-42113 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220216-0012 |
CVE-2021-4214 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221020-0001 |
CVE-2021-42252 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211112-0006 |
CVE-2021-42327 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211118-0005 |
CVE-2021-42340 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211104-0001 |
CVE-2021-42373 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211223-0002 |
CVE-2021-42374 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211223-0002 |
CVE-2021-42375 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211223-0002 |
CVE-2021-42376 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211223-0002 |
CVE-2021-42377 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211223-0002 |
CVE-2021-42378 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211223-0002 |
CVE-2021-42379 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211223-0002 |
CVE-2021-42380 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211223-0002 |
CVE-2021-42381 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211223-0002 |
CVE-2021-42382 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211223-0002 |
CVE-2021-42383 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211223-0002 |
CVE-2021-42384 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211223-0002 |
CVE-2021-42385 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211223-0002 |
CVE-2021-42386 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211223-0002 |
CVE-2021-42392 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220119-0001 |
CVE-2021-42550 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211229-0001 |
CVE-2021-42554 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220216-0007 |
CVE-2021-42739 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211118-0001 |
CVE-2021-42771 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251017-0003 |
CVE-2021-43057 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211125-0001 |
CVE-2021-43138 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006 |
CVE-2021-43267 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211125-0002 |
CVE-2021-43323 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220217-0013 |
CVE-2021-43466 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221014-0001 |
CVE-2021-43522 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220216-0003 |
CVE-2021-43527 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211229-0002 |
CVE-2021-43566 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220110-0001 |
CVE-2021-43615 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220216-0010 |
CVE-2021-43616 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211210-0002 |
CVE-2021-43618 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221111-0001 |
CVE-2021-43797 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220107-0003 |
CVE-2021-43798 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211229-0004 |
CVE-2021-43813 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220107-0006 |
CVE-2021-43815 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220107-0006 |
CVE-2021-43818 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220107-0005 |
CVE-2021-43975 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211210-0001 |
CVE-2021-43976 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211210-0001 |
CVE-2021-44141 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220201-0001 |
CVE-2021-44142 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220201-0002 |
CVE-2021-44224 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211224-0001 |
CVE-2021-44228 | 2021-12-10 | CRITICAL | 10.0 | Apache Log4j2 2.0-beta9 through 2.15.0 (excluding security releases 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1) JNDI features used in configuration, log messages, and parameters NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211210-0007 |
CVE-2021-44420 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211229-0006 |
CVE-2021-44521 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220225-0001 |
CVE-2021-44528 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240208-0003 |
CVE-2021-44531 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220325-0007 |
CVE-2021-44532 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220325-0007 |
CVE-2021-44533 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220325-0007 |
CVE-2021-44548 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220114-0005 |
CVE-2021-44716 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0002 |
CVE-2021-44733 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220114-0003 |
CVE-2021-44758 | 2022-12-26 | HIGH | 7.5 | Heimdal before 7.7.1 allows attackers to cause a NULL pointer dereference in a SPNEGO acceptor via a preferred_mech_type of GSS_C_NO_OID and a nonzero initial_r NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230216-0008 |
CVE-2021-44790 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211224-0001 |
CVE-2021-44832 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220104-0001 |
CVE-2021-44906 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006 |
CVE-2021-45046 | 2021-12-14 | CRITICAL | 9.0 | It was found that the fix to address CVE-2021-44228 in Apache Log4j 2.15.0 was incomplete in certain non-default configurations. This could allows attackers wit NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211215-0001 |
CVE-2021-45078 | 2021-12-15 | HIGH | 7.8 | stab_xcoff_builtin_type in stabs.c in GNU Binutils through 2.37 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer overflow) or possibly have unsp NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220107-0002 |
CVE-2021-45100 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220107-0001 |
CVE-2021-45105 | 2021-12-18 | MEDIUM | 5.9 | Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This al NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211218-0001 |
CVE-2021-45115 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0005 |
CVE-2021-45116 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0005 |
CVE-2021-45346 | 2022-02-14 | MEDIUM | 4.3 | A Memory Leak vulnerability exists in SQLite Project SQLite3 3.35.1 and 3.37.0 via maliciously crafted SQL Queries (made via editing the Database File), it is p NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220303-0001 |
CVE-2021-45452 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0005 |
CVE-2021-45459 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220107-0004 |
CVE-2021-45469 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220114-0003 |
CVE-2021-45485 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0001 |
CVE-2021-45868 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220419-0003 |
CVE-2021-45960 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220121-0004 |
CVE-2021-45969 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220216-0004 |
CVE-2021-45970 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220216-0004 |
Years: 2026 · 2025 · 2024 · 2023 · 2022 · 2021 · 2020 · 2019 · 2018 · 2017 · 2016 · 2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 1999