NetApp Black Box — ONTAP knowledge base

Home / Security / CVE index / 2021

2021 NetApp CVEs (page 2)

Showing 300 CVEs with a 2021 identifier — page 2 of 4. Sorted by CVE id.

Always verify. NetApp's advisory is authoritative for affected versions and fixes; NVD carries the CVSS record.
Showing 300 of 300
CVEPublishedSeverityCVSSSummary / Sources
CVE-2021-25218——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210909-0002
CVE-2021-25219——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211118-0002
CVE-2021-25220——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220408-0001
CVE-2021-25329——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210409-0002
CVE-2021-25642——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221201-0003
CVE-2021-25736——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231221-0003
CVE-2021-25737——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211004-0004
CVE-2021-25740——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211014-0001
CVE-2021-25741——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211008-0006
CVE-2021-25742——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211203-0001
CVE-2021-25743——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220217-0003
CVE-2021-25745——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220609-0006
CVE-2021-25746——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220609-0006
CVE-2021-26073——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210604-0004
CVE-2021-26117——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210304-0008
CVE-2021-26118——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210827-0002
CVE-2021-26296——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210528-0007
CVE-2021-26690——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210702-0001
CVE-2021-26691——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210702-0001
CVE-2021-26707——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210716-0008
CVE-2021-26708——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210312-0008
CVE-2021-26930——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210326-0001
CVE-2021-26931——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210326-0001
CVE-2021-26932——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210326-0001
CVE-2021-26934——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210326-0001
CVE-2021-26937——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250509-0004
CVE-2021-26987——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210315-0001
CVE-2021-269882021-03-04LOW3.5Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.3P21, 9.5P16, 9.6P12, 9.7P8 and 9.8 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow unauthorized tenant users to d NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210303-0001
CVE-2021-269892021-03-04MEDIUM6.5Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.3P21, 9.5P16, 9.6P12, 9.7P9 and 9.8 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow a remote authenticated attacke NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210303-0002
CVE-2021-26990——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210318-0001
CVE-2021-26991——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210318-0002
CVE-2021-26992——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210318-0003
CVE-2021-26993——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210610-0001
CVE-2021-269942021-06-04MEDIUM6.5Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.7P13 and 9.8P3 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow single workloads to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210601-0001
CVE-2021-26995——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210610-0002
CVE-2021-26996——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210610-0003
CVE-2021-26997——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210610-0004
CVE-2021-269982021-08-06MEDIUM4.3NetApp Cloud Manager versions prior to 3.9.9 log sensitive information that is available only to authenticated users. Customers with auto-upgrade enabled should NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210805-0011
CVE-2021-269992021-08-06MEDIUM4.3NetApp Cloud Manager versions prior to 3.9.9 log sensitive information when an Active Directory connection fails. The logged information is available only to au NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210805-0012
CVE-2021-270012021-10-19MEDIUM5.5Clustered Data ONTAP versions 9.x prior to 9.5P18, 9.6P16, 9.7P16, 9.8P7 and 9.9.1P2 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow an authenticated privi NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211018-0001
CVE-2021-270022021-10-11HIGH7.5NetApp Cloud Manager versions prior to 3.9.10 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to retrieve sensitive data NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211011-0001
CVE-2021-270032021-10-12MEDIUM4.7Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.5P18, 9.6P15, 9.7P14, 9.8P5 and 9.9.1 are missing an X-Frame-Options header which could allow a clickjacking attack. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211012-0001
CVE-2021-27004——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211029-0001
CVE-2021-270052021-11-01HIGH7.5Clustered Data ONTAP versions 9.6 and higher prior to 9.6P16, 9.7P16, 9.8P7 and 9.9.1P3 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow a remote attacker t NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211029-0002
CVE-2021-27006——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211221-0001
CVE-2021-270072021-12-23CRITICAL9.8NetApp Virtual Desktop Service (VDS) when used with an HTML5 gateway is susceptible to a vulnerability which when successfully exploited could allow an unauthen NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211223-0008
CVE-2021-27185——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210319-0002
CVE-2021-27191——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210319-0002
CVE-2021-27212——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210319-0005
CVE-2021-27218——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210319-0004
CVE-2021-27219——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210319-0004
CVE-2021-27358——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0007
CVE-2021-27363——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210409-0001
CVE-2021-27364——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210409-0001
CVE-2021-27365——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210409-0001
CVE-2021-27405——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210326-0002
CVE-2021-27789——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210819-0002
CVE-2021-27790——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210819-0002
CVE-2021-27791——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210819-0002
CVE-2021-27792——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210819-0002
CVE-2021-27793——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210819-0001
CVE-2021-27794——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210819-0001
CVE-2021-27796——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220217-0011
CVE-2021-27797——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220216-0001
CVE-2021-27850——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210528-0002
CVE-2021-27905——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210611-0009
CVE-2021-27919——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260206-0005
CVE-2021-28038——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210409-0001
CVE-2021-28039——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210409-0001
CVE-2021-28041——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210416-0002
CVE-2021-28092——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0008
CVE-2021-28147——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210430-0005
CVE-2021-28148——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210430-0005
CVE-2021-28153——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210416-0003
CVE-2021-281632021-04-01LOW2.7In Eclipse Jetty 9.4.32 to 9.4.38, 10.0.0.beta2 to 10.0.1, and 11.0.0.beta2 to 11.0.1, if a user uses a webapps directory that is a symlink, the contents of the NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210611-0006
CVE-2021-281642021-04-01MEDIUM5.3In Eclipse Jetty 9.4.37.v20210219 to 9.4.38.v20210224, the default compliance mode allows requests with URIs that contain %2e or %2e%2e segments to access prote NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210611-0006
CVE-2021-281652021-04-01HIGH7.5In Eclipse Jetty 7.2.2 to 9.4.38, 10.0.0.alpha0 to 10.0.1, and 11.0.0.alpha0 to 11.0.1, CPU usage can reach 100% upon receiving a large invalid TLS frame. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210611-0006
CVE-2021-28167——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006
CVE-2021-28169——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210727-0009
CVE-2021-28363——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0007
CVE-2021-28375——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210401-0003
CVE-2021-28651——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210716-0007
CVE-2021-28657——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210507-0004
CVE-2021-28658——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210528-0001
CVE-2021-28660——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210507-0008
CVE-2021-28691——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210805-0002
CVE-2021-28831——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250509-0005
CVE-2021-28860——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210618-0005
CVE-2021-28918——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210528-0010
CVE-2021-28951——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210430-0003
CVE-2021-28952——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210430-0003
CVE-2021-28957——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210521-0004
CVE-2021-28964——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210430-0003
CVE-2021-28965——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210528-0003
CVE-2021-28966——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210902-0004
CVE-2021-28971——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210430-0003
CVE-2021-28972——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210430-0003
CVE-2021-29154——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210604-0006
CVE-2021-29262——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210604-0009
CVE-2021-29266——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0005
CVE-2021-29418——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210604-0001
CVE-2021-29424——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210604-0007
CVE-2021-29425——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0004
CVE-2021-29469——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210611-0010
CVE-2021-29484——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210618-0006
CVE-2021-29489——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210622-0005
CVE-2021-29491——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210622-0002
CVE-2021-29505——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210708-0007
CVE-2021-29626——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210423-0008
CVE-2021-29627——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210423-0007
CVE-2021-29628——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210713-0002
CVE-2021-29629——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210713-0003
CVE-2021-29630——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210923-0005
CVE-2021-29631——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210923-0004
CVE-2021-29632——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220217-0004
CVE-2021-29657——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210902-0008
CVE-2021-29662——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210604-0002
CVE-2021-29678——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220114-0002
CVE-2021-29679——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211112-0005
CVE-2021-29702——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210720-0005
CVE-2021-29703——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210720-0006
CVE-2021-29716——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211223-0006
CVE-2021-29719——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211223-0006
CVE-2021-29745——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211112-0005
CVE-2021-29752——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220526-0003
CVE-2021-29756——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211223-0006
CVE-2021-29763——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211029-0005
CVE-2021-29768——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220729-0002
CVE-2021-29777——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210720-0006
CVE-2021-29823——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221014-0005
CVE-2021-29824——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220602-0003
CVE-2021-29825——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211029-0005
CVE-2021-29867——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211223-0006
CVE-2021-299212021-05-06CRITICAL9.8In Python before 3,9,5, the ipaddress library mishandles leading zero characters in the octets of an IP address string. This (in some situations) allows attacke NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210622-0003
CVE-2021-29943——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210604-0009
CVE-2021-30465——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210708-0003
CVE-2021-30468——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210917-0002
CVE-2021-30638——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210528-0004
CVE-2021-30639——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210827-0007
CVE-2021-30640——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210827-0007
CVE-2021-30641——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210702-0001
CVE-2021-3114——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0001
CVE-2021-3115——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0001
CVE-2021-3121——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0006
CVE-2021-31231——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210611-0001
CVE-2021-31239——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230609-0010
CVE-2021-31294——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230814-0007
CVE-2021-31440——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210706-0003
CVE-2021-31535——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210813-0001
CVE-2021-31542——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210618-0001 · NTAP-20210618-0010
CVE-2021-31562021-01-26HIGH7.8Sudo before 1.9.5p2 contains an off-by-one error that can result in a heap-based buffer overflow, which allows privilege escalation to root via "sudoedit -s" an NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210128-0002
CVE-2021-31597——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210618-0004
CVE-2021-31618——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210727-0008
CVE-2021-31684——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006
CVE-2021-31693——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221223-0009
CVE-2021-31772021-01-19CRITICAL9.8Python 3.x through 3.9.1 has a buffer overflow in PyCArg_repr in _ctypes/callproc.c, which may lead to remote code execution in certain Python applications that NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210226-0003
CVE-2021-31799——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210902-0004
CVE-2021-31805——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220420-0001
CVE-2021-31806——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210716-0007
CVE-2021-31807——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210716-0007
CVE-2021-31808——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210716-0007
CVE-2021-31810——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210917-0001
CVE-2021-318792021-04-29MEDIUM6.1GNU Wget through 1.21.1 does not omit the Authorization header upon a redirect to a different origin, a related issue to CVE-2018-1000007. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210618-0002
CVE-2021-3189——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210401-0004
CVE-2021-32027——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210713-0004
CVE-2021-32028——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211112-0003
CVE-2021-32029——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211112-0003
CVE-2021-32040——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220609-0005
CVE-2021-32050——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231006-0001
CVE-2021-32052——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210611-0002
CVE-2021-32066——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210902-0004
CVE-2021-32078——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210813-0002
CVE-2021-32256——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230824-0013
CVE-2021-32292——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230929-0010
CVE-2021-3236——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230915-0001
CVE-2021-32399——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210622-0006
CVE-2021-32606——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210625-0001
CVE-2021-32626——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211104-0003
CVE-2021-32627——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211104-0003
CVE-2021-32628——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211104-0003
CVE-2021-32640——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210706-0005
CVE-2021-32672——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211104-0003
CVE-2021-32675——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211104-0003
CVE-2021-32687——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211104-0003
CVE-2021-32761——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210827-0004
CVE-2021-32762——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211104-0003
CVE-2021-32765——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211104-0003
CVE-2021-32785——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210902-0001
CVE-2021-32786——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210902-0001
CVE-2021-3281——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210226-0004
CVE-2021-33036——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220722-0003
CVE-2021-33037——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210827-0007
CVE-2021-33058——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211210-0005
CVE-2021-33059——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211210-0005
CVE-2021-33060——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220930-0004
CVE-2021-33061——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0010
CVE-2021-33068——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0006
CVE-2021-33096——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0010
CVE-2021-33098——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211210-0005
CVE-2021-33103——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220818-0003
CVE-2021-33117——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220818-0001
CVE-2021-33122——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220818-0003
CVE-2021-33123——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220818-0003
CVE-2021-33124——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220818-0003
CVE-2021-33141——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250718-0012
CVE-2021-33142——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250718-0012
CVE-2021-33145——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250718-0012
CVE-2021-33146——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250718-0012
CVE-2021-33149——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220818-0002
CVE-2021-33150——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220311-0001
CVE-2021-33157——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250718-0012
CVE-2021-33158——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250718-0012
CVE-2021-33161——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250718-0012
CVE-2021-33162——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250718-0012
CVE-2021-33193——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210917-0004
CVE-2021-33195——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210902-0005
CVE-2021-33200——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210706-0004
CVE-2021-33203——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210727-0004
CVE-2021-33204——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210625-0006
CVE-2021-33262021-01-27HIGH7.5The iconv function in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) 2.32 and earlier, when processing invalid input sequences in the ISO-2022-JP-3 encoding, fails an a NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210304-0007
CVE-2021-3347——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210304-0005
CVE-2021-33473——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220715-0004
CVE-2021-33502——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210706-0001
CVE-2021-33571——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210727-0004
CVE-2021-33574——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210629-0005
CVE-2021-33587——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210706-0007
CVE-2021-33621——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221228-0004
CVE-2021-33623——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210702-0007
CVE-2021-33625——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220222-0004
CVE-2021-33626——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220216-0006
CVE-2021-33627——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220222-0002
CVE-2021-3377——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241108-0002
CVE-2021-33909——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210819-0004
CVE-2021-33910——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211104-0008
CVE-2021-3392——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210507-0001
CVE-2021-3393——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210507-0006
CVE-2021-3409——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210507-0001
CVE-2021-3416——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210507-0002
CVE-2021-3421——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260612-0020
CVE-2021-34262021-05-20MEDIUM5.7There's a flaw in Python 3's pydoc. A local or adjacent attacker who discovers or is able to convince another local or adjacent user to start a pydoc server cou NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210629-0003
CVE-2021-34428——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210813-0003
CVE-2021-34429——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210819-0006
CVE-2021-3444——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210416-0006
CVE-2021-34492021-03-25MEDIUM5.9An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006 · NTAP-20210513-0002 +1
CVE-2021-34502021-03-25HIGH7.4The X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT flag enables additional security checks of the certificates present in a certificate chain. It is not set by default. Starting from NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210326-0006
CVE-2021-34558——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210813-0005
CVE-2021-347982021-09-16HIGH7.5Malformed requests may cause the server to dereference a NULL pointer. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 and earlier. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211008-0004
CVE-2021-3483——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210629-0002
CVE-2021-34866——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220217-0008
CVE-2021-3489——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210716-0004
CVE-2021-3490——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210716-0004
CVE-2021-3491——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210716-0004
CVE-2021-3501——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210618-0008
CVE-2021-3503——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220609-0004
CVE-2021-35039——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210813-0004
CVE-2021-35042——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210805-0008
CVE-2021-3506——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210611-0007
CVE-2021-35065——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230214-0010
CVE-2021-3507——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210528-0005
CVE-2021-35162021-06-01HIGH7.8There's a flaw in libxml2's xmllint in versions before 2.9.11. An attacker who is able to submit a crafted file to be processed by xmllint could trigger a use-a NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210716-0005
CVE-2021-35172021-05-19HIGH8.6There is a flaw in the xml entity encoding functionality of libxml2 in versions before 2.9.11. An attacker who is able to supply a crafted file to be processed NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0004 · NTAP-20210625-0002
CVE-2021-35182021-05-18HIGH8.8There's a flaw in libxml2 in versions before 2.9.11. An attacker who is able to submit a crafted file to be processed by an application linked with libxml2 coul NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210625-0002
CVE-2021-35202021-06-02CRITICAL9.8There's a flaw in lz4. An attacker who submits a crafted file to an application linked with lz4 may be able to trigger an integer overflow, leading to calling o NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211104-0005
CVE-2021-3521——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260612-0018
CVE-2021-3522——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0004
CVE-2021-3527——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210708-0008
CVE-2021-35302021-06-02HIGH7.5A flaw was discovered in GNU libiberty within demangle_path() in rust-demangle.c, as distributed in GNU Binutils version 2.36. A crafted symbol can cause stack NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210716-0006
CVE-2021-35372021-05-14MEDIUM5.9A vulnerability found in libxml2 in versions before 2.9.11 shows that it did not propagate errors while parsing XML mixed content, causing a NULL dereference. I NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210625-0002
CVE-2021-35412021-07-09MEDIUM6.5A flaw was found in libxml2. Exponential entity expansion attack its possible bypassing all existing protection mechanisms and leading to denial of service. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210805-0007
CVE-2021-3544——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210720-0008
CVE-2021-3545——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210720-0008
CVE-2021-3546——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210720-0008
CVE-2021-35492021-05-26HIGH7.1An out of bounds flaw was found in GNU binutils objdump utility version 2.36. An attacker could use this flaw and pass a large section to avr_elf32_load_records NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250228-0005
CVE-2021-35515——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0001
CVE-2021-35516——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0001
CVE-2021-35517——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0001
CVE-2021-35537——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003
CVE-2021-35546——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003
CVE-2021-35550——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006 · NTAP-20211022-0004
CVE-2021-35556——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006 · NTAP-20211022-0004
CVE-2021-35559——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006 · NTAP-20211022-0004
CVE-2021-35560——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006 · NTAP-20211022-0004
CVE-2021-35561——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0004
CVE-2021-35564——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006 · NTAP-20211022-0004
CVE-2021-35565——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006 · NTAP-20211022-0004
CVE-2021-35567——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0004
CVE-2021-35575——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003
CVE-2021-35577——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003
CVE-2021-35578——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006 · NTAP-20211022-0004
CVE-2021-35583——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003
CVE-2021-35584——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003
CVE-2021-35586——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006 · NTAP-20211022-0004
CVE-2021-35588——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006 · NTAP-20211022-0004
CVE-2021-35592021-05-24MEDIUM6.5A flaw was found in libvirt in the virConnectListAllNodeDevices API in versions before 7.0.0. It only affects hosts with a PCI device and driver that supports m NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210706-0006
CVE-2021-35590——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003
CVE-2021-35591——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003
CVE-2021-35592——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003
CVE-2021-35593——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003
CVE-2021-35594——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003
CVE-2021-35596——— NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211022-0003

Years: 2026 · 2025 · 2024 · 2023 · 2022 · 2021 · 2020 · 2019 · 2018 · 2017 · 2016 · 2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 1999

← CVE index · Security hub