Home / Security / CVE index / 2019
2019 NetApp CVEs (page 2)
Showing 300 CVEs with a 2019 identifier — page 2 of 3. Sorted by CVE id.
Always verify. NetApp's advisory is authoritative for affected versions and fixes; NVD carries the CVSS record.
Showing 300 of 300
| CVE | Published | Severity | CVSS | Summary / Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2019-15635 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191009-0002 |
CVE-2019-15666 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191004-0001 |
CVE-2019-15807 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191004-0001 |
CVE-2019-15845 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191122-0003 |
CVE-2019-15874 | 2020-04-29 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | In FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE before r356035, 12.1-RELEASE before 12.1-RELEASE-p4, 11.3-STABLE before r356036, and 11.3-RELEASE before 11.3-RELEASE-p8, incomplete pack NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200511-0002 |
CVE-2019-15875 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200210-0003 |
CVE-2019-15876 | 2020-04-28 | MEDIUM | 5.5 | In FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE before r356089, 12.1-RELEASE before 12.1-RELEASE-p3, 11.3-STABLE before r356090, and 11.3-RELEASE before 11.3-RELEASE-p7, driver specific NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200413-0001 |
CVE-2019-15877 | 2020-04-28 | MEDIUM | 5.5 | In FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE before r356606 and 12.1-RELEASE before 12.1-RELEASE-p3, driver specific ioctl command handlers in the ixl network driver failed to check NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200413-0001 |
CVE-2019-15878 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200518-0007 |
CVE-2019-15879 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200518-0005 |
CVE-2019-15880 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200518-0008 |
CVE-2019-15902 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191004-0001 |
CVE-2019-15903 | 2019-09-04 | HIGH | 7.5 | In libexpat before 2.2.8, crafted XML input could fool the parser into changing from DTD parsing to document parsing too early; a consecutive call to XML_GetCur NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190926-0004 |
CVE-2019-15916 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191004-0001 |
CVE-2019-15917 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191004-0001 |
CVE-2019-15918 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191004-0001 |
CVE-2019-15919 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191004-0001 |
CVE-2019-15920 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191004-0001 |
CVE-2019-15921 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191004-0001 |
CVE-2019-15922 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191004-0001 |
CVE-2019-15923 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191004-0001 |
CVE-2019-15924 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191004-0001 |
CVE-2019-15925 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191004-0001 |
CVE-2019-15926 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191004-0001 |
CVE-2019-15927 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191004-0001 |
CVE-2019-16056 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190926-0005 |
CVE-2019-16089 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191004-0001 |
CVE-2019-16168 | 2019-09-09 | MEDIUM | 6.5 | In SQLite through 3.29.0, whereLoopAddBtreeIndex in sqlite3.c can crash a browser or other application because of missing validation of a sqlite_stat1 sz field, NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200122-0003 · NTAP-20190926-0003 |
CVE-2019-16201 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191122-0003 |
CVE-2019-16203 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200511-0008 |
CVE-2019-16204 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200511-0007 |
CVE-2019-16229 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191004-0001 |
CVE-2019-16230 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191004-0001 |
CVE-2019-16231 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191004-0001 |
CVE-2019-16232 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191004-0001 |
CVE-2019-16233 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191004-0001 |
CVE-2019-16234 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191004-0001 |
CVE-2019-16254 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191122-0003 |
CVE-2019-16255 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191122-0003 |
CVE-2019-16276 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191122-0004 |
CVE-2019-16335 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191004-0002 |
CVE-2019-16413 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191004-0001 |
CVE-2019-16714 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191031-0005 |
CVE-2019-16746 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191031-0005 |
CVE-2019-16869 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220204-0001 |
CVE-2019-16884 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220221-0004 |
CVE-2019-16905 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191024-0003 |
CVE-2019-16935 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0004 |
CVE-2019-16942 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0006 |
CVE-2019-16943 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0006 |
CVE-2019-16994 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191031-0005 |
CVE-2019-16995 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191031-0005 |
CVE-2019-17006 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210129-0001 |
CVE-2019-17067 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191127-0003 |
CVE-2019-17068 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191127-0003 |
CVE-2019-17069 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191127-0003 |
CVE-2019-17133 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191031-0005 |
CVE-2019-17267 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0006 |
CVE-2019-17272 | 2019-11-21 | HIGH | 7.2 | All versions of ONTAP Select Deploy administration utility are susceptible to a vulnerability which when successfully exploited could allow an administrative us NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191121-0002 |
CVE-2019-17273 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200129-0001 |
CVE-2019-17274 | 2020-02-26 | HIGH | 7.8 | NetApp FAS 8300/8700 and AFF A400 Baseboard Management Controller (BMC) firmware versions 13.x prior to 13.1P1 were shipped with a default account enabled that NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200226-0001 |
CVE-2019-17275 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200226-0003 |
CVE-2019-17276 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200323-0001 |
CVE-2019-17351 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191031-0005 |
CVE-2019-17359 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191024-0006 |
CVE-2019-17450 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191024-0002 |
CVE-2019-17451 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191024-0002 |
CVE-2019-17498 | 2019-10-21 | HIGH | 8.1 | In libssh2 v1.9.0 and earlier versions, the SSH_MSG_DISCONNECT logic in packet.c has an integer overflow in a bounds check, enabling an attacker to specify an a NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220909-0004 |
CVE-2019-17514 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191107-0005 |
CVE-2019-17531 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191024-0005 |
CVE-2019-17543 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210723-0001 |
CVE-2019-17546 | 2019-10-14 | HIGH | 8.8 | tif_getimage.c in LibTIFF through 4.0.10, as used in GDAL through 3.0.1 and other products, has an integer overflow that potentially causes a heap-based buffer NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241220-0007 |
CVE-2019-17563 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200107-0001 |
CVE-2019-17567 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210702-0001 |
CVE-2019-17569 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200327-0005 |
CVE-2019-17571 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200110-0001 |
CVE-2019-17592 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191127-0002 |
CVE-2019-17596 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191122-0005 |
CVE-2019-17626 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240719-0006 |
CVE-2019-17666 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191031-0005 |
CVE-2019-18197 | 2019-10-18 | HIGH | 7.5 | In xsltCopyText in transform.c in libxslt 1.1.33, a pointer variable isn't reset under certain circumstances. If the relevant memory area happened to be freed a NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0004 · NTAP-20191031-0004 |
CVE-2019-18198 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191031-0005 |
CVE-2019-18218 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200115-0001 |
CVE-2019-18276 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200430-0003 |
CVE-2019-18282 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200204-0002 |
CVE-2019-18348 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191107-0004 |
CVE-2019-18634 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200210-0001 |
CVE-2019-18660 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200103-0001 |
CVE-2019-18675 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200103-0001 |
CVE-2019-18680 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-18683 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-18805 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-18807 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-18808 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-18809 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-18810 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-18811 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-18812 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-18813 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-18814 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-18885 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19036 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19037 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19043 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19044 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19045 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19047 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19048 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19050 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19051 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19052 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19053 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19054 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19056 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19057 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19058 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19059 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19060 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19061 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19062 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19063 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19065 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19066 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19068 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19069 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19071 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19072 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19073 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19074 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19075 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19076 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19077 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19078 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19079 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19080 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19081 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19082 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19083 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191205-0001 |
CVE-2019-19118 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191217-0003 |
CVE-2019-19227 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200103-0001 |
CVE-2019-19232 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200103-0004 |
CVE-2019-19234 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200103-0004 |
CVE-2019-19241 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200103-0001 |
CVE-2019-19252 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200103-0001 |
CVE-2019-19317 | 2019-12-05 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | lookupName in resolve.c in SQLite 3.30.1 omits bits from the colUsed bitmask in the case of a generated column, which allows attackers to cause a denial of serv NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191223-0001 |
CVE-2019-19318 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200103-0001 |
CVE-2019-19319 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200103-0001 |
CVE-2019-19332 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200204-0002 |
CVE-2019-19343 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220211-0002 |
CVE-2019-19344 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200122-0001 |
CVE-2019-19377 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200103-0001 |
CVE-2019-19378 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200103-0001 |
CVE-2019-19391 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251017-0014 |
CVE-2019-19447 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200103-0001 |
CVE-2019-19448 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200103-0001 |
CVE-2019-19449 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200103-0001 |
CVE-2019-19462 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210129-0004 |
CVE-2019-19499 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200918-0003 |
CVE-2019-19543 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200924-0005 |
CVE-2019-19602 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200103-0001 |
CVE-2019-19603 | 2019-12-09 | HIGH | 7.5 | SQLite 3.30.1 mishandles certain SELECT statements with a nonexistent VIEW, leading to an application crash. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191223-0001 |
CVE-2019-19645 | 2019-12-09 | MEDIUM | 5.5 | alter.c in SQLite through 3.30.1 allows attackers to trigger infinite recursion via certain types of self-referential views in conjunction with ALTER TABLE stat NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191223-0001 |
CVE-2019-19646 | 2019-12-09 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | pragma.c in SQLite through 3.30.1 mishandles NOT NULL in an integrity_check PRAGMA command in certain cases of generated columns. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191223-0001 |
CVE-2019-19767 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200103-0001 |
CVE-2019-19768 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200103-0001 |
CVE-2019-19769 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200103-0001 |
CVE-2019-19770 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200103-0001 |
CVE-2019-19807 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200103-0001 |
CVE-2019-19813 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200103-0001 |
CVE-2019-19814 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200103-0001 |
CVE-2019-19815 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200103-0001 |
CVE-2019-19816 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200103-0001 |
CVE-2019-19844 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200110-0003 |
CVE-2019-19880 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200114-0001 |
CVE-2019-19922 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200204-0002 |
CVE-2019-19923 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200114-0003 |
CVE-2019-19924 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200114-0003 |
CVE-2019-19925 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200114-0003 |
CVE-2019-19926 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200114-0003 |
CVE-2019-19927 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200204-0002 |
CVE-2019-19947 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200204-0002 |
CVE-2019-19956 | 2019-12-24 | HIGH | 7.5 | xmlParseBalancedChunkMemoryRecover in parser.c in libxml2 before 2.9.10 has a memory leak related to newDoc->oldNs. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200114-0002 |
CVE-2019-19959 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200204-0001 |
CVE-2019-19965 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200204-0002 |
CVE-2019-19966 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200204-0002 |
CVE-2019-20054 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200204-0002 |
CVE-2019-20095 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200204-0002 |
CVE-2019-20330 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200127-0004 |
CVE-2019-20372 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200127-0003 |
CVE-2019-20386 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200210-0002 |
CVE-2019-20388 | 2020-01-21 | HIGH | 7.5 | xmlSchemaPreRun in xmlschemas.c in libxml2 2.9.10 allows an xmlSchemaValidateStream memory leak. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200702-0005 |
CVE-2019-20422 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200313-0003 |
CVE-2019-20444 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220204-0001 |
CVE-2019-20445 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220204-0001 |
CVE-2019-20446 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221111-0004 |
CVE-2019-20636 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200430-0004 |
CVE-2019-20794 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200608-0001 |
CVE-2019-20806 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200619-0001 |
CVE-2019-20808 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210205-0003 |
CVE-2019-20907 | 2020-07-13 | HIGH | 7.5 | In Lib/tarfile.py in Python through 3.8.3, an attacker is able to craft a TAR archive leading to an infinite loop when opened by tarfile.open, because _proc_pax NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200731-0002 |
CVE-2019-20916 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260429-0001 |
CVE-2019-2215 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191031-0005 |
CVE-2019-2420 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190118-0002 |
CVE-2019-2422 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190118-0001 |
CVE-2019-2426 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190118-0001 |
CVE-2019-2434 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190118-0002 |
CVE-2019-2435 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190118-0002 |
CVE-2019-2436 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190118-0002 |
CVE-2019-2449 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190118-0001 |
CVE-2019-2455 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190118-0002 |
CVE-2019-2481 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190118-0002 |
CVE-2019-2482 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190118-0002 |
CVE-2019-2486 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190118-0002 |
CVE-2019-2494 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190118-0002 |
CVE-2019-2495 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190118-0002 |
CVE-2019-25013 | 2021-01-04 | MEDIUM | 5.9 | The iconv feature in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) through 2.32, when processing invalid multi-byte input sequences in the EUC-KR encoding, may have a NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210205-0004 |
CVE-2019-2502 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190118-0002 |
CVE-2019-2503 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190118-0002 |
CVE-2019-25031 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210507-0007 |
CVE-2019-25032 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210507-0007 |
CVE-2019-25033 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210507-0007 |
CVE-2019-25034 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210507-0007 |
CVE-2019-25035 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210507-0007 |
CVE-2019-25036 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210507-0007 |
CVE-2019-25037 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210507-0007 |
CVE-2019-25038 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210507-0007 |
CVE-2019-25039 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210507-0007 |
CVE-2019-25040 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210507-0007 |
CVE-2019-25041 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210507-0007 |
CVE-2019-25042 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210507-0007 |
CVE-2019-25044 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210629-0006 |
CVE-2019-25045 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210720-0003 |
CVE-2019-2507 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190118-0002 |
CVE-2019-2510 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190118-0002 |
CVE-2019-2513 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190118-0002 |
CVE-2019-2528 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190118-0002 |
CVE-2019-2529 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190118-0002 |
CVE-2019-2530 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190118-0002 |
CVE-2019-2531 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190118-0002 |
CVE-2019-2532 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190118-0002 |
CVE-2019-2533 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190118-0002 |
CVE-2019-2534 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190118-0002 |
CVE-2019-2535 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190118-0002 |
CVE-2019-2536 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190118-0002 |
CVE-2019-2537 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190118-0002 |
CVE-2019-2539 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190118-0002 |
CVE-2019-2540 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190118-0001 |
CVE-2019-2566 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2580 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2581 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2584 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2585 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2587 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2589 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2592 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2593 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2596 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2602 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0003 |
CVE-2019-2606 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2607 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2614 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2617 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2620 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2623 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2624 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2625 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2626 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2627 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2628 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2630 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2631 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2632 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2634 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2635 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2636 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2644 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2681 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2683 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2684 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0003 |
CVE-2019-2685 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2686 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2687 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2688 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2689 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2691 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2692 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2693 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2694 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2695 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0002 |
CVE-2019-2697 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0003 |
CVE-2019-2698 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0003 |
CVE-2019-2699 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190423-0003 |
CVE-2019-2730 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2731 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2737 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2738 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2739 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2740 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2741 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2743 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
Years: 2026 · 2025 · 2024 · 2023 · 2022 · 2021 · 2020 · 2019 · 2018 · 2017 · 2016 · 2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 1999