Home / Security / CVE index / 2019
2019 NetApp CVEs (page 3)
Showing 258 CVEs with a 2019 identifier — page 3 of 3. Sorted by CVE id.
Always verify. NetApp's advisory is authoritative for affected versions and fixes; NVD carries the CVSS record.
Showing 258 of 258
| CVE | Published | Severity | CVSS | Summary / Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2019-2745 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0005 |
CVE-2019-2746 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2747 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2752 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2755 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2757 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2758 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2762 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0005 |
CVE-2019-2766 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0005 |
CVE-2019-2769 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0005 |
CVE-2019-2774 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2778 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2780 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2784 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2785 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2786 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0005 |
CVE-2019-2789 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2791 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2795 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2796 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2797 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2798 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2800 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2801 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2802 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2803 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2805 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2808 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2810 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2811 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2812 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2814 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2815 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2816 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0005 |
CVE-2019-2818 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0005 |
CVE-2019-2819 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2821 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0005 |
CVE-2019-2822 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2826 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2830 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2834 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2842 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0005 |
CVE-2019-2879 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 |
CVE-2019-2894 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0001 |
CVE-2019-2910 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0002 |
CVE-2019-2911 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0002 |
CVE-2019-2914 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0002 |
CVE-2019-2922 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0002 |
CVE-2019-2923 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0002 |
CVE-2019-2924 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0002 |
CVE-2019-2933 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0001 |
CVE-2019-2938 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0002 |
CVE-2019-2945 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0001 |
CVE-2019-2946 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0002 |
CVE-2019-2948 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0002 |
CVE-2019-2949 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0001 |
CVE-2019-2950 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0002 |
CVE-2019-2957 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0002 |
CVE-2019-2958 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0001 |
CVE-2019-2960 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0002 |
CVE-2019-2962 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0001 |
CVE-2019-2963 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0002 |
CVE-2019-2964 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0001 |
CVE-2019-2966 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0002 |
CVE-2019-2967 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0002 |
CVE-2019-2968 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0002 |
CVE-2019-2969 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0002 |
CVE-2019-2973 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0001 |
CVE-2019-2974 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0002 |
CVE-2019-2975 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0001 |
CVE-2019-2977 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0001 |
CVE-2019-2978 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0001 |
CVE-2019-2981 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0001 |
CVE-2019-2982 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0002 |
CVE-2019-2983 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0001 |
CVE-2019-2987 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0001 |
CVE-2019-2988 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0001 |
CVE-2019-2989 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0001 |
CVE-2019-2991 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0002 |
CVE-2019-2992 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0001 |
CVE-2019-2993 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0002 |
CVE-2019-2996 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0001 |
CVE-2019-2997 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0002 |
CVE-2019-2998 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0002 |
CVE-2019-2999 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0001 |
CVE-2019-3003 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0002 |
CVE-2019-3004 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0002 |
CVE-2019-3009 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0002 |
CVE-2019-3011 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0002 |
CVE-2019-3016 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200313-0003 |
CVE-2019-3018 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0002 |
CVE-2019-3462 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190125-0002 |
CVE-2019-3773 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231227-0011 |
CVE-2019-3795 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250711-0003 |
CVE-2019-3805 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190517-0004 |
CVE-2019-3822 | 2019-02-06 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | libcurl versions from 7.36.0 to before 7.64.0 are vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow. The function creating an outgoing NTLM type-3 header (`lib/vauth/ NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0004 · NTAP-20190315-0001 |
CVE-2019-3823 | 2019-02-06 | MEDIUM | 4.3 | libcurl versions from 7.34.0 to before 7.64.0 are vulnerable to a heap out-of-bounds read in the code handling the end-of-response for SMTP. If the buffer passe NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190315-0001 |
CVE-2019-3824 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190226-0001 |
CVE-2019-3829 | 2019-03-27 | MEDIUM | 5.3 | A vulnerability was found in gnutls versions from 3.5.8 before 3.6.7. A memory corruption (double free) vulnerability in the certificate verification API. Any c NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190619-0004 |
CVE-2019-3836 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190502-0005 |
CVE-2019-3843 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190619-0002 |
CVE-2019-3844 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190619-0002 |
CVE-2019-3846 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190710-0002 |
CVE-2019-3855 | 2019-03-21 | HIGH | 8.8 | An integer overflow flaw which could lead to an out of bounds write was discovered in libssh2 before 1.8.1 in the way packets are read from the server. A remote NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190327-0005 |
CVE-2019-3856 | 2019-03-25 | HIGH | 8.8 | An integer overflow flaw, which could lead to an out of bounds write, was discovered in libssh2 before 1.8.1 in the way keyboard prompt requests are parsed. A r NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190327-0005 |
CVE-2019-3857 | 2019-03-25 | HIGH | 8.8 | An integer overflow flaw which could lead to an out of bounds write was discovered in libssh2 before 1.8.1 in the way SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_REQUEST packets with an ex NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190327-0005 |
CVE-2019-3858 | 2019-03-21 | MEDIUM | 5.0 | An out of bounds read flaw was discovered in libssh2 before 1.8.1 when a specially crafted SFTP packet is received from the server. A remote attacker who compro NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190327-0005 |
CVE-2019-3859 | 2019-03-21 | CRITICAL | 9.1 | An out of bounds read flaw was discovered in libssh2 before 1.8.1 in the _libssh2_packet_require and _libssh2_packet_requirev functions. A remote attacker who c NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190327-0005 |
CVE-2019-3860 | 2019-03-25 | MEDIUM | 5.0 | An out of bounds read flaw was discovered in libssh2 before 1.8.1 in the way SFTP packets with empty payloads are parsed. A remote attacker who compromises a SS NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190327-0005 |
CVE-2019-3861 | 2019-03-25 | MEDIUM | 5.0 | An out of bounds read flaw was discovered in libssh2 before 1.8.1 in the way SSH packets with a padding length value greater than the packet length are parsed. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190327-0005 |
CVE-2019-3862 | 2019-03-21 | HIGH | 7.3 | An out of bounds read flaw was discovered in libssh2 before 1.8.1 in the way SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_REQUEST packets with an exit status message and no payload are pars NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190327-0005 |
CVE-2019-3863 | 2019-03-25 | HIGH | 7.5 | A flaw was found in libssh2 before 1.8.1 creating a vulnerability on the SSH client side. A server could send a multiple keyboard interactive response messages NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190327-0005 |
CVE-2019-3870 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190408-0001 |
CVE-2019-3874 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190411-0003 |
CVE-2019-3880 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190411-0004 |
CVE-2019-3882 | 2019-04-24 | MEDIUM | 5.5 | A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's vfio interface implementation that permits violation of the user's locked memory limit. If a device is bound to a vfio dr NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190517-0005 |
CVE-2019-3888 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0019 |
CVE-2019-3894 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190517-0004 |
CVE-2019-3896 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190710-0002 |
CVE-2019-3900 | 2019-04-25 | HIGH | 7.7 | An infinite loop issue was found in the vhost_net kernel module in Linux Kernel up to and including v5.1-rc6, while handling incoming packets in handle_rx(). It NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190517-0005 |
CVE-2019-3901 | 2019-04-22 | MEDIUM | 4.7 | A race condition in perf_event_open() allows local attackers to leak sensitive data from setuid programs. As no relevant locks (in particular the cred_guard_mut NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190517-0005 |
CVE-2019-4139 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190617-0004 |
CVE-2019-4178 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190509-0004 |
CVE-2019-4183 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191009-0001 |
CVE-2019-4231 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200103-0003 |
CVE-2019-4253 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190903-0002 |
CVE-2019-4334 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191127-0001 |
CVE-2019-4342 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191009-0001 |
CVE-2019-4343 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200110-0002 |
CVE-2019-4471 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210622-0004 |
CVE-2019-4555 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200103-0003 |
CVE-2019-4588 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210629-0004 |
CVE-2019-4645 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191127-0001 |
CVE-2019-4653 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210622-0004 |
CVE-2019-4722 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210622-0004 |
CVE-2019-4723 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210622-0004 |
CVE-2019-4724 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210622-0004 |
CVE-2019-4729 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200504-0002 |
CVE-2019-4730 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210622-0004 |
CVE-2019-5018 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190521-0001 |
CVE-2019-5021 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190510-0001 |
CVE-2019-5094 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200115-0002 |
CVE-2019-5108 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200204-0002 |
CVE-2019-5188 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220506-0001 |
CVE-2019-5435 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190606-0004 |
CVE-2019-5436 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190606-0004 |
CVE-2019-5443 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191017-0002 |
CVE-2019-5481 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191004-0003 |
CVE-2019-5482 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0003 · NTAP-20191004-0003 |
CVE-2019-5489 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190307-0001 |
CVE-2019-5490 | 2019-03-21 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Certain versions between 2.x to 5.x (refer to advisory) of the NetApp Service Processor firmware were shipped with a default account enabled that could allow un NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190305-0001 |
CVE-2019-5491 | 2019-02-27 | HIGH | 7.5 | Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.1P15 and 9.3 prior to 9.3P7 are susceptible to a vulnerability which discloses sensitive information to an unauthentica NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190227-0001 |
CVE-2019-5492 | 2019-04-29 | HIGH | 7.5 | Element Plug-in for vCenter Server versions prior to 4.2.3 may disclose sensitive account information to an unauthenticated attacker. NetApp HCI Compute Node ve NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190426-0001 |
CVE-2019-5493 | 2019-08-02 | HIGH | 7.5 | Data ONTAP operating in 7-Mode versions prior to 8.2.5P3 are susceptible to a vulnerability which discloses information to an unauthenticated attacker. A succes NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190801-0002 |
CVE-2019-5494 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190509-0006 |
CVE-2019-5495 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190509-0007 |
CVE-2019-5496 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190509-0005 |
CVE-2019-5497 | 2019-07-01 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | NetApp AFF A700s Baseboard Management Controller (BMC) firmware versions 1.22 and higher were shipped with a default account enabled that could allow unauthoriz NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190627-0001 |
CVE-2019-5498 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190809-0001 |
CVE-2019-5500 | 2020-05-11 | HIGH | 7.5 | Certain versions of the NetApp Service Processor and Baseboard Management Controller firmware allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause a Denial of Servi NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190802-0003 |
CVE-2019-5501 | 2019-08-02 | HIGH | 7.5 | Data ONTAP operating in 7-Mode versions prior to 8.2.5P3 may disclose sensitive LDAP account information to unauthenticated remote attackers. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190801-0001 |
CVE-2019-5502 | 2019-08-05 | CRITICAL | 9.1 | SMB in Data ONTAP operating in 7-Mode versions prior to 8.2.5P3 has weak cryptography which when exploited could lead to information disclosure or addition or m NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190802-0002 |
CVE-2019-5503 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190909-0001 |
CVE-2019-5504 | 2019-09-24 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | ONTAP Select Deploy administration utility versions 2.12 & 2.12.1 ship with an HTTP service bound to the network allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to pe NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190923-0001 |
CVE-2019-5505 | 2019-09-24 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | ONTAP Select Deploy administration utility versions 2.2 through 2.12.1 transmit credentials in plaintext. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190923-0002 |
CVE-2019-5506 | 2019-10-09 | MEDIUM | 5.9 | Clustered Data ONTAP versions 9.0 and higher do not enforce hostname verification under certain circumstances making them susceptible to impersonation via man-i NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191009-0003 |
CVE-2019-5508 | 2019-10-25 | HIGH | 7.5 | Clustered Data ONTAP versions 9.2 through 9.4 are susceptible to a vulnerability which allows an attacker to use l2ping to cause a Denial of Service (DoS). NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191024-0001 |
CVE-2019-5509 | 2019-11-21 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | ONTAP Select Deploy administration utility versions 2.11.2 through 2.12.2 are susceptible to a code injection vulnerability which when successfully exploited co NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191121-0001 |
CVE-2019-5597 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190611-0001 |
CVE-2019-5598 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190611-0001 |
CVE-2019-5599 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190625-0004 |
CVE-2019-5603 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190814-0003 |
CVE-2019-5604 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190814-0003 |
CVE-2019-5605 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190814-0003 |
CVE-2019-5606 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190814-0003 |
CVE-2019-5607 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190814-0003 |
CVE-2019-5608 | 2019-08-30 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | In FreeBSD 12.0-STABLE before r350648, 12.0-RELEASE before 12.0-RELEASE-p9, 11.3-STABLE before r350650, 11.3-RELEASE before 11.3-RELEASE-p2, and 11.2-RELEASE be NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190910-0002 |
CVE-2019-5609 | 2019-08-30 | HIGH | 7.5 | In FreeBSD 12.0-STABLE before r350619, 12.0-RELEASE before 12.0-RELEASE-p9, 11.3-STABLE before r350619, 11.3-RELEASE before 11.3-RELEASE-p2, and 11.2-RELEASE be NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190910-0002 |
CVE-2019-5610 | 2019-08-30 | HIGH | 7.5 | In FreeBSD 12.0-STABLE before r350637, 12.0-RELEASE before 12.0-RELEASE-p9, 11.3-STABLE before r350638, 11.3-RELEASE before 11.3-RELEASE-p2, and 11.2-RELEASE be NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190910-0002 |
CVE-2019-5611 | 2019-08-30 | HIGH | 7.5 | In FreeBSD 12.0-STABLE before r350828, 12.0-RELEASE before 12.0-RELEASE-p10, 11.3-STABLE before r350829, 11.3-RELEASE before 11.3-RELEASE-p3, and 11.2-RELEASE b NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190910-0002 |
CVE-2019-5612 | 2019-08-30 | HIGH | 7.5 | In FreeBSD 12.0-STABLE before r351264, 12.0-RELEASE before 12.0-RELEASE-p10, 11.3-STABLE before r351265, 11.3-RELEASE before 11.3-RELEASE-p3, and 11.2-RELEASE b NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190910-0002 |
CVE-2019-5613 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200210-0003 |
CVE-2019-5614 | 2020-04-29 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | In FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE before r356035, 12.1-RELEASE before 12.1-RELEASE-p4, 11.3-STABLE before r356036, and 11.3-RELEASE before 11.3-RELEASE-p8, incomplete pack NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200511-0002 |
CVE-2019-5736 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190307-0008 |
CVE-2019-5737 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190502-0008 |
CVE-2019-5739 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190502-0008 |
CVE-2019-5953 | 2019-05-17 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Buffer overflow in GNU Wget 1.20.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial-of-service (DoS) or may execute an arbitrary code via unspecified vecto NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190509-0001 |
CVE-2019-6109 | 2019-01-31 | MEDIUM | 6.8 | An issue was discovered in OpenSSH 7.9. Due to missing character encoding in the progress display, a malicious server (or Man-in-The-Middle attacker) can employ NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190213-0001 |
CVE-2019-6110 | 2019-01-31 | MEDIUM | 6.8 | In OpenSSH 7.9, due to accepting and displaying arbitrary stderr output from the server, a malicious server (or Man-in-The-Middle attacker) can manipulate the c NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190213-0001 |
CVE-2019-6111 | 2019-01-31 | MEDIUM | 5.9 | An issue was discovered in OpenSSH 7.9. Due to the scp implementation being derived from 1983 rcp, the server chooses which files/directories are sent to the cl NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190213-0001 |
CVE-2019-6260 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190314-0001 |
CVE-2019-6454 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190327-0004 |
CVE-2019-6465 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190814-0004 |
CVE-2019-6467 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190514-0002 |
CVE-2019-6468 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190514-0002 |
CVE-2019-6471 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190625-0003 |
CVE-2019-6475 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191024-0004 |
CVE-2019-6476 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191024-0004 |
CVE-2019-6477 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20191122-0001 |
CVE-2019-6501 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190411-0006 |
CVE-2019-6977 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190315-0003 |
CVE-2019-7221 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190404-0002 |
CVE-2019-7222 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190404-0002 |
CVE-2019-7317 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190719-0005 |
CVE-2019-7612 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190411-0002 |
CVE-2019-8457 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190606-0002 |
CVE-2019-8460 | 2019-08-26 | HIGH | 7.5 | OpenBSD kernel version <= 6.5 can be forced to create long chains of TCP SACK holes that causes very expensive calls to tcp_sack_option() for every incoming SAC NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190905-0001 |
CVE-2019-8921 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211203-0002 |
CVE-2019-8922 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211203-0002 |
CVE-2019-8934 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190411-0006 |
CVE-2019-8936 | 2019-05-15 | HIGH | 7.5 | NTP through 4.2.8p12 has a NULL Pointer Dereference. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190503-0001 |
CVE-2019-9003 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190327-0002 |
CVE-2019-9020 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190321-0001 |
CVE-2019-9021 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190321-0001 |
CVE-2019-9022 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190321-0001 |
CVE-2019-9023 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190321-0001 |
CVE-2019-9024 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190321-0001 |
CVE-2019-9025 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190321-0001 |
CVE-2019-9070 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190314-0003 |
CVE-2019-9071 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190314-0003 |
CVE-2019-9072 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190314-0003 |
CVE-2019-9073 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190314-0003 |
CVE-2019-9074 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190314-0003 |
CVE-2019-9075 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190314-0003 |
CVE-2019-9076 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190314-0003 |
CVE-2019-9077 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190314-0003 |
CVE-2019-9162 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190327-0002 |
CVE-2019-9169 | 2019-02-26 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | In the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) through 2.29, proceed_next_node in posix/regexec.c has a heap-based buffer over-read via an attempted case-insensitive NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190315-0002 |
CVE-2019-9193 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190502-0003 |
CVE-2019-9511 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190823-0002 · NTAP-20190823-0005 |
CVE-2019-9512 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190823-0005 · NTAP-20190823-0001 +1 |
CVE-2019-9513 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190823-0002 · NTAP-20190823-0005 |
CVE-2019-9514 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190823-0005 · NTAP-20190823-0001 +1 |
CVE-2019-9515 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190823-0005 |
CVE-2019-9516 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190823-0002 · NTAP-20190823-0005 |
CVE-2019-9517 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190823-0005 · NTAP-20190823-0003 |
CVE-2019-9518 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190823-0005 |
CVE-2019-9628 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190611-0003 |
CVE-2019-9636 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190517-0001 |
CVE-2019-9637 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190502-0007 |
CVE-2019-9638 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190502-0007 |
CVE-2019-9639 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190502-0007 |
CVE-2019-9640 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190502-0007 |
CVE-2019-9641 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190502-0007 |
CVE-2019-9674 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200221-0003 |
CVE-2019-9740 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190619-0005 |
CVE-2019-9857 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190404-0002 |
CVE-2019-9894 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190404-0001 |
CVE-2019-9895 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190404-0001 |
CVE-2019-9896 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190404-0001 |
CVE-2019-9897 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190404-0001 |
CVE-2019-9898 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190401-0002 |
CVE-2019-9924 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190411-0001 |
CVE-2019-9936 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190416-0005 |
CVE-2019-9937 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190416-0005 |
CVE-2019-9946 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190416-0002 |
CVE-2019-9947 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190404-0004 |
CVE-2019-9948 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20190404-0004 |
Years: 2026 · 2025 · 2024 · 2023 · 2022 · 2021 · 2020 · 2019 · 2018 · 2017 · 2016 · 2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 1999