Home / Security / CVE index / 2025
2025 NetApp CVEs (page 2)
Showing 300 CVEs with a 2025 identifier — page 2 of 3. Sorted by CVE id.
Always verify. NetApp's advisory is authoritative for affected versions and fixes; NVD carries the CVSS record.
Showing 300 of 300
| CVE | Published | Severity | CVSS | Summary / Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2025-30204 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250404-0002 |
CVE-2025-30211 | 2025-03-28 | HIGH | 7.5 | Erlang/OTP is a set of libraries for the Erlang programming language. Prior to versions OTP-27.3.1, 26.2.5.10, and 25.3.2.19, a maliciously formed KEX init mess NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250530-0006 |
CVE-2025-30258 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250904-0002 |
CVE-2025-3050 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250620-0002 |
CVE-2025-30513 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260311-0003 |
CVE-2025-30681 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250502-0006 |
CVE-2025-30682 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250502-0006 |
CVE-2025-30683 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250502-0006 |
CVE-2025-30684 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250502-0006 |
CVE-2025-30685 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250502-0006 |
CVE-2025-30687 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250502-0006 |
CVE-2025-30688 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250502-0006 |
CVE-2025-30689 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250502-0006 |
CVE-2025-30691 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250418-0004 |
CVE-2025-30693 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250502-0006 |
CVE-2025-30695 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250502-0006 |
CVE-2025-30696 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250502-0006 |
CVE-2025-30698 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260522-0001 · NTAP-20250502-0005 |
CVE-2025-30699 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250502-0006 |
CVE-2025-30703 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250502-0006 |
CVE-2025-30704 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250502-0006 |
CVE-2025-30705 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250502-0006 |
CVE-2025-30706 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250418-0007 |
CVE-2025-30715 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250502-0006 |
CVE-2025-30721 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250502-0006 |
CVE-2025-30722 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250418-0005 |
CVE-2025-30749 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260522-0001 · NTAP-20250724-0013 |
CVE-2025-30752 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250724-0011 |
CVE-2025-30754 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260522-0001 · NTAP-20250724-0013 |
CVE-2025-30761 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260522-0001 · NTAP-20250724-0010 |
CVE-2025-3083 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251114-0013 |
CVE-2025-3085 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251114-0012 |
CVE-2025-31115 | 2025-04-03 | HIGH | 8.7 | XZ Utils provide a general-purpose data-compression library plus command-line tools. In XZ Utils 5.3.3alpha to 5.8.0, the multithreaded .xz decoder in liblzma h NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250530-0001 |
CVE-2025-31133 | 2025-11-06 | HIGH | 7.8 | runc is a CLI tool for spawning and running containers according to the OCI specification. In versions 1.2.7 and below, 1.3.0-rc.1 through 1.3.1, 1.4.0-rc.1 and NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251121-0001 |
CVE-2025-31257 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251024-0009 |
CVE-2025-31498 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251114-0006 |
CVE-2025-31648 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260311-0002 |
CVE-2025-31650 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250530-0009 |
CVE-2025-31651 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250530-0010 |
CVE-2025-31672 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250523-0004 |
CVE-2025-31944 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260311-0003 |
CVE-2025-3198 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250904-0004 |
CVE-2025-32003 | 2026-02-10 | MEDIUM | 6.5 | Out-of-bounds read in the firmware for some 100GbE Intel(R) Ethernet Network Adapter E810 before version cvl fw 1.7.6, cpk 1.3.7 within Ring 0: Bare Metal OS ma NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260313-0014 |
CVE-2025-32007 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260311-0003 |
CVE-2025-32008 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260313-0015 |
CVE-2025-32086 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260121-0015 |
CVE-2025-32414 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250605-0004 |
CVE-2025-32415 | 2025-04-17 | LOW | 2.9 | In libxml2 before 2.13.8 and 2.14.x before 2.14.2, xmlSchemaIDCFillNodeTables in xmlschemas.c has a heap-based buffer under-read. To exploit this, a crafted XML NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250605-0003 |
CVE-2025-32433 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250425-0001 |
CVE-2025-32442 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250822-0001 |
CVE-2025-32462 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251003-0001 |
CVE-2025-32463 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250704-0010 |
CVE-2025-32467 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260311-0003 |
CVE-2025-32728 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250425-0002 |
CVE-2025-3277 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250530-0005 |
CVE-2025-32988 | 2025-07-10 | MEDIUM | 6.5 | A flaw was found in GnuTLS. A double-free vulnerability exists in GnuTLS due to incorrect ownership handling in the export logic of Subject Alternative Name (SA NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250725-0009 |
CVE-2025-32989 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250725-0008 |
CVE-2025-32990 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250725-0006 |
CVE-2025-33012 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251121-0009 |
CVE-2025-33092 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250919-0005 |
CVE-2025-33114 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250919-0006 |
CVE-2025-33123 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260917-0001 |
CVE-2025-33143 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250919-0008 |
CVE-2025-33147 | 2026-09-18 | MEDIUM | 5.9 | IBM Cognos Analytics 12.1.0 through 12.1.3 FP1, and 12.0.4 through 12.0.4 FP2 could allow an attacker on a shared network to obtain sensitive information caused NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260917-0001 |
CVE-2025-3360 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250919-0010 |
CVE-2025-3454 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251010-0005 |
CVE-2025-3576 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250530-0008 |
CVE-2025-3580 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251010-0006 |
CVE-2025-36001 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260220-0009 |
CVE-2025-36006 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251121-0011 |
CVE-2025-36008 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260220-0003 |
CVE-2025-36009 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260213-0010 |
CVE-2025-36010 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250919-0004 |
CVE-2025-36070 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260213-0009 |
CVE-2025-36071 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250919-0007 |
CVE-2025-36076 | 2026-09-18 | MEDIUM | 4.3 | IBM Cognos Analytics 12.1.0 through 12.1.3 FP1, and 12.0.4 through 12.0.4 FP2 stores sensitive information in source code could be used by an authenticated user NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260917-0001 |
CVE-2025-36098 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260213-0006 |
CVE-2025-36122 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260422-0012 |
CVE-2025-36123 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260220-0010 |
CVE-2025-36126 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260522-0001 |
CVE-2025-36131 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251121-0008 |
CVE-2025-36136 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251121-0007 |
CVE-2025-36184 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260220-0005 |
CVE-2025-36185 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251121-0006 |
CVE-2025-36186 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251121-0010 |
CVE-2025-36247 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260227-0012 |
CVE-2025-3633 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260522-0001 |
CVE-2025-36353 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260305-0003 |
CVE-2025-36365 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260213-0004 |
CVE-2025-36366 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260220-0007 |
CVE-2025-36372 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260626-0011 |
CVE-2025-36384 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260220-0004 |
CVE-2025-36387 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260220-0008 |
CVE-2025-36423 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260213-0008 |
CVE-2025-36424 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260213-0007 |
CVE-2025-36425 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260227-0015 |
CVE-2025-36427 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260213-0005 |
CVE-2025-36428 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260305-0004 |
CVE-2025-36442 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260220-0002 |
CVE-2025-37731 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260305-0005 |
CVE-2025-37820 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251128-0008 |
CVE-2025-37864 | 2025-05-09 | MEDIUM | 5.5 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: dsa: clean up FDB, MDB, VLAN entries on unbind As explained in many places such as comm NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260925-0011 |
CVE-2025-37894 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251128-0009 |
CVE-2025-37924 | 2025-05-20 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ksmbd: fix use-after-free in kerberos authentication Setting sess->user = NULL was introduce NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260424-0011 |
CVE-2025-37944 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251114-0010 |
CVE-2025-37973 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251128-0010 |
CVE-2025-37997 | 2025-05-29 | HIGH | 7.8 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: ipset: fix region locking in hash types Region locking introduced in v5.6-rc4 con NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251128-0011 |
CVE-2025-38089 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260102-0009 |
CVE-2025-38092 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260102-0008 |
CVE-2025-38181 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260121-0009 |
CVE-2025-38249 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260121-0003 |
CVE-2025-38430 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260121-0004 |
CVE-2025-38465 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260121-0005 |
CVE-2025-38488 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260121-0007 |
CVE-2025-38491 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260121-0006 |
CVE-2025-38584 | 2025-08-19 | HIGH | 7.0 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: padata: Fix pd UAF once and for all There is a race condition/UAF in padata_reorder that goe NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260925-0008 |
CVE-2025-38622 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260213-0020 |
CVE-2025-38627 | 2025-08-22 | HIGH | 7.8 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: compress: fix UAF of f2fs_inode_info in f2fs_free_dic The decompress_io_ctx may be rel NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260925-0005 |
CVE-2025-38666 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260213-0019 |
CVE-2025-38710 | 2025-09-04 | HIGH | 7.8 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: gfs2: Validate i_depth for exhash directories A fuzzer test introduced corruption that ends NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260925-0006 |
CVE-2025-38728 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260121-0008 |
CVE-2025-38732 | 2025-09-05 | MEDIUM | 5.5 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nf_reject: don't leak dst refcount for loopback packets recent patches to add a W NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260123-0006 |
CVE-2025-38734 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251224-0010 |
CVE-2025-39823 | 2025-09-16 | HIGH | 7.8 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: x86: use array_index_nospec with indices that come from guest min and dest_id are guest NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251224-0012 |
CVE-2025-39828 | 2025-09-16 | HIGH | 7.8 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: atm: atmtcp: Prevent arbitrary write in atmtcp_recv_control(). syzbot reported the splat bel NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251224-0013 |
CVE-2025-39839 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251205-0015 |
CVE-2025-39942 | 2025-10-04 | HIGH | 7.5 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ksmbd: smbdirect: verify remaining_data_length respects max_fragmented_recv_size This is ins NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260123-0004 |
CVE-2025-39943 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260121-0011 |
CVE-2025-39946 | 2025-10-04 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tls: make sure to abort the stream if headers are bogus Normally we wait for the socket to b NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260121-0010 |
CVE-2025-39971 | 2025-10-15 | HIGH | 8.8 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: i40e: fix idx validation in config queues msg Ensure idx is within range of active/initializ NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260213-0017 |
CVE-2025-39973 | 2025-10-15 | HIGH | 8.8 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: i40e: add validation for ring_len param The `ring_len` parameter provided by the virtual fun NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260213-0016 |
CVE-2025-39997 | 2025-10-15 | — | — | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ALSA: usb-audio: fix race condition to UAF in snd_usbmidi_free The previous commit 0718a78f6 NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260925-0012 |
CVE-2025-40027 | 2025-10-28 | HIGH | 7.8 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/9p: fix double req put in p9_fd_cancelled Syzkaller reports a KASAN issue as below: gene NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260123-0005 |
CVE-2025-40281 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251224-0011 |
CVE-2025-40347 | 2025-12-16 | HIGH | 7.5 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: enetc: fix the deadlock of enetc_mdio_lock After applying the workaround for err050089, NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260925-0007 |
CVE-2025-4056 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251010-0010 |
CVE-2025-40775 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250523-0001 |
CVE-2025-40776 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250725-0001 |
CVE-2025-40777 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250725-0002 |
CVE-2025-40778 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251031-0001 |
CVE-2025-40780 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251031-0002 |
CVE-2025-40909 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250718-0002 |
CVE-2025-41115 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251128-0004 |
CVE-2025-41117 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260313-0006 |
CVE-2025-4123 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250620-0001 |
CVE-2025-41232 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250904-0006 |
CVE-2025-41234 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250711-0002 |
CVE-2025-41242 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250912-0002 |
CVE-2025-41244 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260605-0005 |
CVE-2025-41248 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251219-0011 |
CVE-2025-41249 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250926-0002 |
CVE-2025-41254 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251107-0010 |
CVE-2025-4138 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250718-0006 |
CVE-2025-4207 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251107-0003 |
CVE-2025-4330 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250718-0007 |
CVE-2025-43368 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260123-0013 |
CVE-2025-4373 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250919-0009 |
CVE-2025-4435 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250718-0008 |
CVE-2025-4447 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260522-0001 |
CVE-2025-4516 | 2025-05-15 | MEDIUM | 5.9 | There is an issue in CPython when using `bytes.decode("unicode_escape", error="ignore|replace")`. If you are not using the "unicode_escape" encoding or an error NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250711-0004 |
CVE-2025-4517 | 2025-06-03 | CRITICAL | 9.4 | Allows arbitrary filesystem writes outside the extraction directory during extraction with filter="data". You are affected by this vulnerability if using the ta NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260917-0001 · NTAP-20250718-0009 |
CVE-2025-4563 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250801-0010 |
CVE-2025-4575 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250613-0009 |
CVE-2025-4598 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250718-0001 |
CVE-2025-46392 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250704-0009 |
CVE-2025-46394 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260327-0010 |
CVE-2025-46701 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250808-0004 |
CVE-2025-46712 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251205-0011 |
CVE-2025-4673 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250822-0009 |
CVE-2025-4674 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250904-0010 |
CVE-2025-46836 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260429-0002 |
CVE-2025-47219 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260123-0013 |
CVE-2025-47273 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251017-0007 |
CVE-2025-47279 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251205-0010 |
CVE-2025-4748 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250808-0005 |
CVE-2025-47906 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251024-0005 |
CVE-2025-47907 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250829-0001 |
CVE-2025-47910 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251219-0002 |
CVE-2025-47911 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260313-0004 |
CVE-2025-47912 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251219-0004 |
CVE-2025-47913 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251128-0003 |
CVE-2025-47914 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251128-0002 |
CVE-2025-4802 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250627-0010 |
CVE-2025-48038 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251205-0012 |
CVE-2025-48040 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251205-0013 |
CVE-2025-48041 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251205-0014 |
CVE-2025-48431 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260529-0015 |
CVE-2025-48734 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250725-0004 |
CVE-2025-4877 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260109-0011 |
CVE-2025-4878 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260109-0008 |
CVE-2025-48795 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260327-0014 |
CVE-2025-48913 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250912-0001 |
CVE-2025-48976 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260522-0001 · NTAP-20251107-0004 |
CVE-2025-48988 | 2025-06-16 | HIGH | 7.5 | Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in Apache Tomcat. This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.7, from 10.1. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251114-0003 |
CVE-2025-48989 | 2025-08-13 | HIGH | 7.5 | Improper Resource Shutdown or Release vulnerability in Apache Tomcat made Tomcat vulnerable to the made you reset attack. This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250822-0010 |
CVE-2025-49124 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250620-0005 |
CVE-2025-49125 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250620-0006 |
CVE-2025-4947 | 2025-05-28 | MEDIUM | 6.5 | libcurl accidentally skips the certificate verification for QUIC connections when connecting to a host specified as an IP address in the URL. Therefore, it does NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250620-0009 |
CVE-2025-49630 | 2025-07-10 | HIGH | 7.5 | In certain proxy configurations, a denial of service attack against Apache HTTP Server versions 2.4.26 through to 2.4.63 can be triggered by untrusted clients c NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250718-0013 |
CVE-2025-49794 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250718-0003 |
CVE-2025-49795 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251017-0001 |
CVE-2025-49796 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250718-0004 |
CVE-2025-49812 | 2025-07-10 | HIGH | 7.4 | In some mod_ssl configurations on Apache HTTP Server versions through to 2.4.63, an HTTP desynchronisation attack allows a man-in-the-middle attacker to hijack NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250718-0013 |
CVE-2025-49844 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251010-0012 |
CVE-2025-50059 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260522-0001 · NTAP-20250724-0009 |
CVE-2025-50063 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250808-0006 |
CVE-2025-50076 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250724-0004 |
CVE-2025-50077 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250724-0008 |
CVE-2025-50078 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250724-0008 |
CVE-2025-50079 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250724-0008 |
CVE-2025-50080 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250724-0008 |
CVE-2025-50081 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250724-0005 |
CVE-2025-50082 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250724-0008 |
CVE-2025-50083 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250724-0008 |
CVE-2025-50084 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250724-0008 |
CVE-2025-50085 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250724-0008 |
CVE-2025-50086 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250724-0008 |
CVE-2025-50087 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250724-0008 |
CVE-2025-50088 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250724-0003 |
CVE-2025-50089 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250724-0007 |
CVE-2025-50091 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250724-0008 |
CVE-2025-50092 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250724-0008 |
CVE-2025-50093 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250724-0008 |
CVE-2025-50094 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250724-0002 |
CVE-2025-50095 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250724-0006 |
CVE-2025-50096 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250724-0008 |
CVE-2025-50097 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250724-0008 |
CVE-2025-50098 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250724-0008 |
CVE-2025-50099 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250724-0008 |
CVE-2025-50100 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250724-0008 |
CVE-2025-50101 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250724-0008 |
CVE-2025-50102 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250724-0008 |
CVE-2025-50103 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250724-0006 |
CVE-2025-50104 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250724-0008 |
CVE-2025-50106 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260522-0001 · NTAP-20250724-0013 |
CVE-2025-50181 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260522-0001 · NTAP-20260102-0005 |
CVE-2025-50182 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260522-0001 · NTAP-20260102-0004 |
CVE-2025-50200 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250808-0001 |
CVE-2025-5025 | 2025-05-28 | MEDIUM | 4.8 | libcurl supports *pinning* of the server certificate public key for HTTPS transfers. Due to an omission, this check is not performed when connecting with QUIC f NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250620-0008 |
CVE-2025-5115 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251003-0006 |
CVE-2025-5187 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260327-0013 |
CVE-2025-52099 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251107-0015 |
CVE-2025-5222 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260116-0002 |
CVE-2025-52434 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250718-0014 |
CVE-2025-5244 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250904-0005 |
CVE-2025-5245 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250718-0010 |
CVE-2025-52520 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250718-0015 |
CVE-2025-52565 | 2025-11-06 | HIGH | 7.5 | runc is a CLI tool for spawning and running containers according to the OCI specification. Versions 1.0.0-rc3 through 1.2.7, 1.3.0-rc.1 through 1.3.2, and 1.4.0 NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251121-0002 |
CVE-2025-5278 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260102-0011 |
CVE-2025-52881 | 2025-11-06 | HIGH | 7.5 | runc is a CLI tool for spawning and running containers according to the OCI specification. In versions 1.2.7, 1.3.2 and 1.4.0-rc.2, an attacker can trick runc i NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251121-0003 |
CVE-2025-53020 | 2025-07-10 | HIGH | 7.5 | Late Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime vulnerability in Apache HTTP Server. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server: from 2.4.17 up to 2.4.63. Users are NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250718-0013 |
CVE-2025-53023 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250724-0001 |
CVE-2025-53032 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250724-0007 |
CVE-2025-53040 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251031-0013 |
CVE-2025-53042 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251031-0013 |
CVE-2025-53044 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251031-0013 |
CVE-2025-53045 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251031-0013 |
CVE-2025-53053 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251031-0013 |
CVE-2025-53054 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251031-0013 |
CVE-2025-53057 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260522-0001 · NTAP-20251031-0006 |
CVE-2025-53062 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251031-0013 |
CVE-2025-53066 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260522-0001 · NTAP-20251031-0006 |
CVE-2025-53067 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251031-0012 |
CVE-2025-53069 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251031-0013 |
CVE-2025-5318 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260102-0001 |
CVE-2025-53506 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250725-0003 |
CVE-2025-5351 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250801-0006 |
CVE-2025-5372 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251128-0005 · NTAP-20250801-0005 |
CVE-2025-53816 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260102-0015 |
CVE-2025-53817 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250829-0002 |
CVE-2025-53905 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251205-0007 |
CVE-2025-53906 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251205-0006 |
CVE-2025-5399 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250724-0008 · NTAP-20250711-0010 |
CVE-2025-54090 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250829-0014 |
CVE-2025-54349 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250912-0003 |
CVE-2025-54350 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260109-0006 |
CVE-2025-54351 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250912-0004 |
CVE-2025-54410 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251107-0009 |
CVE-2025-5449 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260206-0011 |
CVE-2025-54798 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260522-0001 |
CVE-2025-54988 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260618-0005 |
CVE-2025-55130 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260320-0007 |
CVE-2025-55131 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260320-0008 |
CVE-2025-55132 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260320-0007 |
CVE-2025-55163 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251003-0005 |
CVE-2025-55182 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251205-0001 |
CVE-2025-55184 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251219-0015 |
CVE-2025-55193 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260213-0002 |
CVE-2025-55315 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260422-0020 |
CVE-2025-55668 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251003-0003 |
CVE-2025-55752 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251107-0013 |
CVE-2025-55753 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251212-0002 |
CVE-2025-55754 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251031-0011 |
CVE-2025-56200 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260522-0001 |
CVE-2025-5702 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260313-0002 |
CVE-2025-57347 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260327-0008 |
CVE-2025-58056 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260130-0016 |
CVE-2025-58057 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260130-0016 |
CVE-2025-58060 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260327-0009 |
CVE-2025-58098 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251212-0004 |
Years: 2026 · 2025 · 2024 · 2023 · 2022 · 2021 · 2020 · 2019 · 2018 · 2017 · 2016 · 2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 1999