Home / Security / CVE index / 2020
2020 NetApp CVEs (page 2)
Showing 300 CVEs with a 2020 identifier — page 2 of 3. Sorted by CVE id.
Always verify. NetApp's advisory is authoritative for affected versions and fixes; NVD carries the CVSS record.
Showing 300 of 300
| CVE | Published | Severity | CVSS | Summary / Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2020-14782 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0004 |
CVE-2020-14785 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14786 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14789 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14790 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14791 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14792 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0004 |
CVE-2020-14793 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14794 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14796 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0004 |
CVE-2020-14797 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0004 |
CVE-2020-14798 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0004 |
CVE-2020-14799 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14800 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14803 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0004 |
CVE-2020-14804 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14809 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14812 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14814 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14821 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14827 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14828 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14829 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14830 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14836 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14837 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14838 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14839 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14844 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14845 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14846 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14848 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14852 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14853 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14860 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14861 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14866 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14867 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14868 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14869 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14870 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14873 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14878 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14888 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14891 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14893 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-14966 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200724-0001 |
CVE-2020-14967 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200724-0001 |
CVE-2020-14968 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200724-0001 |
CVE-2020-15025 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200702-0002 |
CVE-2020-15049 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210312-0001 |
CVE-2020-15225 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210604-0010 |
CVE-2020-15358 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200709-0001 |
CVE-2020-15366 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0007 |
CVE-2020-15376 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201123-0007 |
CVE-2020-15383 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210819-0002 |
CVE-2020-15386 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210819-0002 |
CVE-2020-15388 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210819-0002 |
CVE-2020-15436 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201218-0002 |
CVE-2020-15522 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210622-0007 |
CVE-2020-15523 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210312-0004 |
CVE-2020-15586 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200731-0005 |
CVE-2020-15705 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200731-0008 |
CVE-2020-15706 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200731-0008 |
CVE-2020-15707 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200731-0008 |
CVE-2020-15778 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200731-0007 |
CVE-2020-15801 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200731-0003 |
CVE-2020-15810 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210226-0006 · NTAP-20210219-0007 |
CVE-2020-15811 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210226-0006 · NTAP-20210219-0007 |
CVE-2020-15852 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200810-0001 |
CVE-2020-15861 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200904-0001 |
CVE-2020-15862 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200904-0001 |
CVE-2020-15890 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251017-0011 |
CVE-2020-15999 | 2020-11-03 | CRITICAL | 9.6 | Heap buffer overflow in Freetype in Google Chrome prior to 86.0.4240.111 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML pag NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240812-0001 |
CVE-2020-16092 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200821-0006 |
CVE-2020-16119 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210304-0006 |
CVE-2020-16166 | 2020-07-30 | LOW | 3.7 | The Linux kernel through 5.7.11 allows remote attackers to make observations that help to obtain sensitive information about the internal state of the network R NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200814-0004 |
CVE-2020-16590 | 2020-12-09 | MEDIUM | 5.5 | A double free vulnerability exists in the Binary File Descriptor (BFD) (aka libbrd) in GNU Binutils 2.35 in the process_symbol_table, as demonstrated in readelf NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210115-0003 |
CVE-2020-16591 | 2020-12-09 | MEDIUM | 5.5 | A Denial of Service vulnerability exists in the Binary File Descriptor (BFD) in GNU Binutils 2.35 due to an invalid read in process_symbol_table, as demonstrate NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210115-0003 |
CVE-2020-16592 | 2020-12-09 | MEDIUM | 5.5 | A use after free issue exists in the Binary File Descriptor (BFD) library (aka libbfd) in GNU Binutils 2.34 in bfd_hash_lookup, as demonstrated in nm-new, that NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210115-0003 |
CVE-2020-16593 | 2020-12-09 | MEDIUM | 5.5 | A Null Pointer Dereference vulnerability exists in the Binary File Descriptor (BFD) library (aka libbfd), as distributed in GNU Binutils 2.35, in scan_unit_for_ NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210122-0003 |
CVE-2020-16598 | 2020-12-09 | — | — | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was n NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210115-0003 |
CVE-2020-16599 | 2020-12-09 | MEDIUM | 5.5 | A Null Pointer Dereference vulnerability exists in the Binary File Descriptor (BFD) library (aka libbfd), as distributed in GNU Binutils 2.35, in _bfd_elf_get_s NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210122-0003 |
CVE-2020-16845 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200924-0002 |
CVE-2020-1730 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200424-0001 |
CVE-2020-17380 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210312-0003 |
CVE-2020-1745 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240216-0011 |
CVE-2020-1748 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201001-0005 |
CVE-2020-1749 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201222-0001 |
CVE-2020-1751 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200430-0002 |
CVE-2020-17516 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210521-0002 |
CVE-2020-1752 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200511-0005 |
CVE-2020-17521 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201218-0006 |
CVE-2020-17527 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201210-0003 |
CVE-2020-17530 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210115-0005 |
CVE-2020-17531 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210115-0007 |
CVE-2020-19143 | 2021-09-09 | MEDIUM | 6.5 | Buffer Overflow in LibTiff v4.0.10 allows attackers to cause a denial of service via the "TIFFVGetField" funtion in the component 'libtiff/tif_dir.c'. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211004-0005 |
CVE-2020-19144 | 2021-09-09 | MEDIUM | 6.5 | Buffer Overflow in LibTiff v4.0.10 allows attackers to cause a denial of service via the 'in _TIFFmemcpy' funtion in the component 'tif_unix.c'. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211004-0005 |
CVE-2020-19185 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231006-0005 |
CVE-2020-19186 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231006-0005 |
CVE-2020-19187 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231006-0005 |
CVE-2020-19188 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231006-0005 |
CVE-2020-19189 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231006-0005 |
CVE-2020-19190 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231006-0005 |
CVE-2020-1927 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200413-0002 |
CVE-2020-1934 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200413-0002 |
CVE-2020-1935 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200327-0005 |
CVE-2020-1938 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200226-0002 |
CVE-2020-1954 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0001 |
CVE-2020-1967 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200717-0004 · NTAP-20200424-0003 |
CVE-2020-1968 | 2020-09-09 | LOW | 3.7 | The Raccoon attack exploits a flaw in the TLS specification which can lead to an attacker being able to compute the pre-master secret in connections which have NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200911-0004 |
CVE-2020-1971 | 2020-12-08 | MEDIUM | 5.9 | The X.509 GeneralName type is a generic type for representing different types of names. One of those name types is known as EDIPartyName. OpenSSL provides a fun NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006 · NTAP-20210513-0002 +1 |
CVE-2020-21490 | 2023-08-22 | MEDIUM | 5.5 | An issue was discovered in GNU Binutils 2.34. It is a memory leak when process microblaze-dis.c. This one will consume memory on each insn disassembled. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230929-0007 |
CVE-2020-21583 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20241220-0006 |
CVE-2020-21913 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260123-0007 |
CVE-2020-22218 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231006-0002 |
CVE-2020-22403 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210909-0004 |
CVE-2020-23064 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230725-0003 |
CVE-2020-24165 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231006-0012 |
CVE-2020-24303 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201123-0002 |
CVE-2020-24346 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200918-0001 |
CVE-2020-24347 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200918-0001 |
CVE-2020-24348 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200918-0001 |
CVE-2020-24349 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200918-0001 |
CVE-2020-24352 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201123-0003 |
CVE-2020-24372 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20251017-0012 |
CVE-2020-24394 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200904-0003 |
CVE-2020-24448 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210212-0006 |
CVE-2020-24450 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210212-0006 |
CVE-2020-24486 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210702-0002 |
CVE-2020-24490 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201016-0006 |
CVE-2020-24492 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210212-0005 |
CVE-2020-24493 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210212-0005 |
CVE-2020-24494 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210212-0005 |
CVE-2020-24495 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210212-0005 |
CVE-2020-24496 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210212-0005 |
CVE-2020-24497 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210212-0005 |
CVE-2020-24498 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210212-0005 |
CVE-2020-24500 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210212-0005 |
CVE-2020-24501 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210212-0005 |
CVE-2020-24505 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210212-0005 |
CVE-2020-24506 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210611-0004 |
CVE-2020-24507 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210611-0004 |
CVE-2020-24509 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210611-0003 |
CVE-2020-24511 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210611-0005 |
CVE-2020-24512 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210611-0005 |
CVE-2020-24516 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210625-0008 |
CVE-2020-24553 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200924-0003 |
CVE-2020-24583 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200918-0004 |
CVE-2020-24584 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200918-0004 |
CVE-2020-24606 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210226-0006 · NTAP-20210219-0007 |
CVE-2020-24616 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200904-0006 |
CVE-2020-24659 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200911-0006 |
CVE-2020-24718 | 2020-09-25 | HIGH | 8.2 | bhyve, as used in FreeBSD through 12.1 and illumos (e.g., OmniOS CE through r151034 and OpenIndiana through Hipster 2020.04), does not properly restrict VMCS an NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201016-0002 |
CVE-2020-24736 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230526-0005 |
CVE-2020-24750 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201009-0003 |
CVE-2020-24977 | 2020-09-04 | MEDIUM | 6.5 | GNOME project libxml2 v2.9.10 has a global buffer over-read vulnerability in xmlEncodeEntitiesInternal at libxml2/entities.c. The issue has been fixed in commit NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200924-0001 |
CVE-2020-25066 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210201-0003 |
CVE-2020-25084 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201009-0005 |
CVE-2020-25085 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201009-0005 |
CVE-2020-25097 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210727-0010 |
CVE-2020-25211 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201009-0001 |
CVE-2020-25220 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201001-0004 |
CVE-2020-25221 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201001-0003 |
CVE-2020-25285 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201009-0002 |
CVE-2020-25577 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210423-0001 |
CVE-2020-25578 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210423-0002 |
CVE-2020-25579 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210423-0002 |
CVE-2020-25580 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210423-0005 |
CVE-2020-25581 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210423-0006 |
CVE-2020-25582 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210423-0003 |
CVE-2020-25583 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210423-0004 |
CVE-2020-25584 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210423-0009 |
CVE-2020-25613 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210115-0008 |
CVE-2020-25624 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201210-0005 |
CVE-2020-25625 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201009-0005 |
CVE-2020-25626 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201016-0003 |
CVE-2020-25632 | 2021-03-03 | HIGH | 8.2 | A flaw was found in grub2 in versions prior to 2.06. The rmmod implementation allows the unloading of a module used as a dependency without checking if any othe NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220325-0001 |
CVE-2020-25638 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220204-0003 |
CVE-2020-25640 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201210-0001 |
CVE-2020-25643 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201103-0002 |
CVE-2020-25644 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201016-0004 |
CVE-2020-25645 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201103-0004 |
CVE-2020-25647 | 2021-03-03 | HIGH | 7.6 | A flaw was found in grub2 in versions prior to 2.06. During USB device initialization, descriptors are read with very little bounds checking and assumes the USB NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220325-0001 |
CVE-2020-25649 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210108-0007 |
CVE-2020-25668 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210702-0005 |
CVE-2020-25669 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210702-0006 |
CVE-2020-25670 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210702-0008 |
CVE-2020-25671 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210702-0008 |
CVE-2020-25672 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210702-0008 |
CVE-2020-25673 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210702-0008 |
CVE-2020-25689 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201123-0006 |
CVE-2020-25692 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210108-0006 |
CVE-2020-25694 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201202-0003 |
CVE-2020-25695 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201202-0003 |
CVE-2020-25705 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201210-0002 |
CVE-2020-25709 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210716-0003 |
CVE-2020-25710 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210716-0003 |
CVE-2020-25711 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0023 |
CVE-2020-25717 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211206-0001 |
CVE-2020-25718 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211206-0001 |
CVE-2020-25719 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211206-0001 |
CVE-2020-2572 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200122-0002 |
CVE-2020-25721 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211206-0001 |
CVE-2020-25722 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211206-0001 |
CVE-2020-25723 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201218-0004 |
CVE-2020-25724 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210702-0003 |
CVE-2020-2573 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200122-0002 |
CVE-2020-2574 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200122-0002 |
CVE-2020-25741 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201009-0005 |
CVE-2020-2577 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200122-0002 |
CVE-2020-2579 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200122-0002 |
CVE-2020-2580 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200122-0002 |
CVE-2020-2583 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200122-0003 |
CVE-2020-2584 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200122-0002 |
CVE-2020-2585 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200122-0003 |
CVE-2020-2588 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200122-0002 |
CVE-2020-2589 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200122-0002 |
CVE-2020-2590 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200122-0003 |
CVE-2020-2593 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200122-0003 |
CVE-2020-2601 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200122-0003 |
CVE-2020-2604 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200122-0003 |
CVE-2020-26116 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0001 |
CVE-2020-26217 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210409-0004 |
CVE-2020-26258 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210409-0005 |
CVE-2020-26259 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210409-0005 |
CVE-2020-2627 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200122-0002 |
CVE-2020-2654 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200122-0003 |
CVE-2020-2655 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200122-0003 |
CVE-2020-2659 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200122-0003 |
CVE-2020-2660 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200122-0002 |
CVE-2020-26708 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230908-0003 |
CVE-2020-2679 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200122-0002 |
CVE-2020-2686 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200122-0002 |
CVE-2020-26939 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201202-0005 |
CVE-2020-2694 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200122-0002 |
CVE-2020-27216 | 2020-10-23 | HIGH | 7.0 | In Eclipse Jetty versions 1.0 thru 9.4.32.v20200930, 10.0.0.alpha1 thru 10.0.0.beta2, and 11.0.0.alpha1 thru 11.0.0.beta2O, on Unix like systems, the system's t NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201123-0005 |
CVE-2020-27218 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201218-0003 |
CVE-2020-27223 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210401-0005 |
CVE-2020-27336 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210201-0003 |
CVE-2020-27337 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210201-0003 |
CVE-2020-27338 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210201-0003 |
CVE-2020-27339 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220216-0005 |
CVE-2020-27350 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210108-0005 |
CVE-2020-2752 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0003 |
CVE-2020-2754 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0004 |
CVE-2020-27543 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210401-0002 |
CVE-2020-2755 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0004 |
CVE-2020-2756 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0004 |
CVE-2020-2757 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0004 |
CVE-2020-2759 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0003 |
CVE-2020-2760 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0003 |
CVE-2020-2761 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0003 |
CVE-2020-27616 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201202-0002 |
CVE-2020-27617 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201202-0002 |
CVE-2020-27618 | 2021-02-26 | MEDIUM | 5.5 | The iconv function in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) 2.32 and earlier, when processing invalid multi-byte input sequences in IBM1364, IBM1371, IBM1388, NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210401-0006 |
CVE-2020-27619 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201123-0004 |
CVE-2020-2762 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0003 |
CVE-2020-2763 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0003 |
CVE-2020-2764 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0004 |
CVE-2020-2765 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0003 |
CVE-2020-27661 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210720-0010 |
CVE-2020-2767 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0004 |
CVE-2020-2768 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0003 |
CVE-2020-2770 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0003 |
CVE-2020-2773 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0004 |
CVE-2020-27730 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210115-0004 |
CVE-2020-2774 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0003 |
CVE-2020-27749 | 2021-03-03 | MEDIUM | 6.7 | A flaw was found in grub2 in versions prior to 2.06. Variable names present are expanded in the supplied command line into their corresponding variable contents NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220325-0001 |
CVE-2020-27779 | 2021-03-03 | HIGH | 7.5 | A flaw was found in grub2 in versions prior to 2.06. The cutmem command does not honor secure boot locking allowing an privileged attacker to remove address ran NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220325-0001 |
CVE-2020-2778 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0004 |
CVE-2020-27783 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210521-0003 |
CVE-2020-27786 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210122-0002 |
CVE-2020-2779 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0003 |
CVE-2020-2780 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0003 |
CVE-2020-2781 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0004 |
CVE-2020-27815 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210702-0004 |
CVE-2020-27821 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210115-0006 |
CVE-2020-27825 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210521-0008 |
CVE-2020-27830 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210625-0004 |
CVE-2020-27840 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210326-0007 |
CVE-2020-27846 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210205-0002 |
CVE-2020-2790 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0003 |
CVE-2020-2800 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0004 |
CVE-2020-2803 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0004 |
CVE-2020-2804 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0003 |
CVE-2020-2805 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0004 |
CVE-2020-2806 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0003 |
CVE-2020-28097 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210805-0001 |
CVE-2020-2812 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0003 |
CVE-2020-2814 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0003 |
CVE-2020-2816 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0004 |
CVE-2020-28196 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0002 · NTAP-20201202-0001 |
CVE-2020-2830 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0004 |
CVE-2020-28362 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201202-0004 |
CVE-2020-28366 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201202-0004 |
CVE-2020-28367 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201202-0004 |
CVE-2020-28374 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210219-0002 |
CVE-2020-28445 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220901-0012 |
CVE-2020-28458 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20240621-0006 |
Years: 2026 · 2025 · 2024 · 2023 · 2022 · 2021 · 2020 · 2019 · 2018 · 2017 · 2016 · 2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 1999