Home / Security / CVE index / 2020
2020 NetApp CVEs (page 3)
Showing 295 CVEs with a 2020 identifier — page 3 of 3. Sorted by CVE id.
Always verify. NetApp's advisory is authoritative for affected versions and fixes; NVD carries the CVSS record.
Showing 295 of 295
| CVE | Published | Severity | CVSS | Summary / Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2020-28488 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210226-0001 |
CVE-2020-28500 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210312-0006 |
CVE-2020-2853 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0003 |
CVE-2020-28851 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210212-0004 |
CVE-2020-28852 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210212-0004 |
CVE-2020-2892 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0003 |
CVE-2020-2893 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0003 |
CVE-2020-2895 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0003 |
CVE-2020-2896 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0003 |
CVE-2020-2897 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0003 |
CVE-2020-28974 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210108-0003 |
CVE-2020-2898 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0003 |
CVE-2020-2901 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0003 |
CVE-2020-2903 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0003 |
CVE-2020-2904 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0003 |
CVE-2020-2921 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0003 |
CVE-2020-2922 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0003 |
CVE-2020-2923 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0003 |
CVE-2020-2924 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0003 |
CVE-2020-2925 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0003 |
CVE-2020-2926 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0003 |
CVE-2020-2928 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0003 |
CVE-2020-2930 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200416-0003 |
CVE-2020-29368 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210108-0002 |
CVE-2020-29369 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210115-0001 |
CVE-2020-29370 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201218-0001 |
CVE-2020-29374 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210115-0002 |
CVE-2020-29443 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210304-0003 |
CVE-2020-29509 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210129-0006 |
CVE-2020-29510 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210129-0006 |
CVE-2020-29511 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210129-0006 |
CVE-2020-29562 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210122-0004 |
CVE-2020-29569 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210205-0001 |
CVE-2020-29573 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210122-0004 |
CVE-2020-29660 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210122-0001 |
CVE-2020-29661 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210122-0001 |
CVE-2020-35342 | 2023-08-22 | HIGH | 7.5 | GNU Binutils before 2.34 has an uninitialized-heap vulnerability in function tic4x_print_cond (file opcodes/tic4x-dis.c) which could allow attackers to make an NVD ↗ · NTAP-20231006-0009 |
CVE-2020-35448 | 2020-12-27 | LOW | 3.3 | An issue was discovered in the Binary File Descriptor (BFD) library (aka libbfd), as distributed in GNU Binutils 2.35.1. A heap-based buffer over-read can occur NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210129-0008 |
CVE-2020-35452 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210702-0001 |
CVE-2020-35490 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210122-0005 |
CVE-2020-35491 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210122-0005 |
CVE-2020-35493 | 2021-01-04 | MEDIUM | 5.5 | A flaw exists in binutils in bfd/pef.c. An attacker who is able to submit a crafted PEF file to be parsed by objdump could cause a heap buffer overflow -> out-o NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210212-0007 |
CVE-2020-35494 | 2021-01-04 | MEDIUM | 6.1 | There's a flaw in binutils /opcodes/tic4x-dis.c. An attacker who is able to submit a crafted input file to be processed by binutils could cause usage of uniniti NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210212-0007 |
CVE-2020-35495 | 2021-01-04 | MEDIUM | 5.5 | There's a flaw in binutils /bfd/pef.c. An attacker who is able to submit a crafted input file to be processed by the objdump program could cause a null pointer NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210212-0007 |
CVE-2020-35496 | 2021-01-04 | MEDIUM | 5.5 | There's a flaw in bfd_pef_scan_start_address() of bfd/pef.c in binutils which could allow an attacker who is able to submit a crafted file to be processed by ob NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210212-0007 |
CVE-2020-35503 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210720-0008 |
CVE-2020-35504 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210713-0006 |
CVE-2020-35505 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210713-0006 |
CVE-2020-35506 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210713-0006 |
CVE-2020-35507 | 2021-01-04 | MEDIUM | 5.5 | There's a flaw in bfd_pef_parse_function_stubs of bfd/pef.c in binutils in versions prior to 2.34 which could allow an attacker who is able to submit a crafted NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210212-0007 |
CVE-2020-35508 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0006 |
CVE-2020-35517 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210312-0002 |
CVE-2020-35519 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210618-0009 |
CVE-2020-35521 | 2021-03-09 | MEDIUM | 5.5 | A flaw was found in libtiff. Due to a memory allocation failure in tif_read.c, a crafted TIFF file can lead to an abort, resulting in denial of service. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210521-0009 |
CVE-2020-35522 | 2021-03-09 | MEDIUM | 5.5 | In LibTIFF, there is a memory malloc failure in tif_pixarlog.c. A crafted TIFF document can lead to an abort, resulting in a remote denial of service attack. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210521-0009 |
CVE-2020-35523 | 2021-03-09 | HIGH | 7.8 | An integer overflow flaw was found in libtiff that exists in the tif_getimage.c file. This flaw allows an attacker to inject and execute arbitrary code when a u NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210521-0009 |
CVE-2020-35524 | 2021-03-09 | HIGH | 7.8 | A heap-based buffer overflow flaw was found in libtiff in the handling of TIFF images in libtiff's TIFF2PDF tool. A specially crafted TIFF file can lead to arbi NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210521-0009 |
CVE-2020-35525 | 2022-09-01 | HIGH | 7.5 | In SQlite 3.31.1, a potential null pointer derreference was found in the INTERSEC query processing. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230706-0007 |
CVE-2020-35527 | 2022-09-01 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | In SQLite 3.31.1, there is an out of bounds access problem through ALTER TABLE for views that have a nested FROM clause. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221111-0007 |
CVE-2020-35728 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210129-0007 |
CVE-2020-36158 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210212-0002 |
CVE-2020-36164 | 2021-01-06 | CRITICAL | 9.3 | An issue was discovered in Veritas Enterprise Vault through 14.0. On start-up, it loads the OpenSSL library. The OpenSSL library then attempts to load the opens NVD ↗ · |
CVE-2020-36179 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210205-0005 |
CVE-2020-36180 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210205-0005 |
CVE-2020-36181 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210205-0005 |
CVE-2020-36182 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210205-0005 |
CVE-2020-36183 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210205-0005 |
CVE-2020-36184 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210205-0005 |
CVE-2020-36185 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210205-0005 |
CVE-2020-36186 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210205-0005 |
CVE-2020-36187 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210205-0005 |
CVE-2020-36188 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210205-0005 |
CVE-2020-36189 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210205-0005 |
CVE-2020-36221 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210226-0002 |
CVE-2020-36222 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210226-0002 |
CVE-2020-36223 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210226-0002 |
CVE-2020-36224 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210226-0002 |
CVE-2020-36225 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210226-0002 |
CVE-2020-36226 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210226-0002 |
CVE-2020-36227 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210226-0002 |
CVE-2020-36228 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210226-0002 |
CVE-2020-36229 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210226-0002 |
CVE-2020-36230 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210226-0002 |
CVE-2020-36309 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210507-0005 |
CVE-2020-36313 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210604-0005 |
CVE-2020-36328 | 2021-05-21 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | A flaw was found in libwebp in versions before 1.0.1. A heap-based buffer overflow in function WebPDecodeRGBInto is possible due to an invalid check for buffer NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211112-0001 |
CVE-2020-36329 | 2021-05-21 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | A flaw was found in libwebp in versions before 1.0.1. A use-after-free was found due to a thread being killed too early. The highest threat from this vulnerabil NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211112-0001 |
CVE-2020-36330 | 2021-05-21 | CRITICAL | 9.1 | A flaw was found in libwebp in versions before 1.0.1. An out-of-bounds read was found in function ChunkVerifyAndAssign. The highest threat from this vulnerabili NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211104-0004 |
CVE-2020-36331 | 2021-05-21 | CRITICAL | 9.1 | A flaw was found in libwebp in versions before 1.0.1. An out-of-bounds read was found in function ChunkAssignData. The highest threat from this vulnerability is NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211112-0001 |
CVE-2020-36332 | 2021-05-21 | HIGH | 7.5 | A flaw was found in libwebp in versions before 1.0.1. When reading a file libwebp allocates an excessive amount of memory. The highest threat from this vulnerab NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211104-0004 |
CVE-2020-36385 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210720-0004 |
CVE-2020-36387 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210727-0006 |
CVE-2020-36516 | 2022-02-26 | MEDIUM | 5.9 | An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel through 5.16.11. The mixed IPID assignment method with the hash-based IPID assignment policy allows an off-path atta NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220331-0003 |
CVE-2020-36518 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220506-0004 |
CVE-2020-36694 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230622-0005 |
CVE-2020-36732 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20230706-0003 |
CVE-2020-4051 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-4135 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210108-0001 |
CVE-2020-4300 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210622-0004 |
CVE-2020-4301 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20221014-0005 |
CVE-2020-4354 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210622-0004 |
CVE-2020-4520 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210622-0004 |
CVE-2020-4561 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210622-0004 |
CVE-2020-4642 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210129-0009 |
CVE-2020-4885 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210720-0006 |
CVE-2020-4945 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210720-0006 |
CVE-2020-4951 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211112-0005 |
CVE-2020-4976 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210409-0003 |
CVE-2020-5024 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210409-0003 |
CVE-2020-5025 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210409-0003 |
CVE-2020-5397 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20260206-0007 |
CVE-2020-5398 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210917-0006 |
CVE-2020-5421 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210513-0009 |
CVE-2020-5863 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200430-0005 |
CVE-2020-5864 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200430-0005 |
CVE-2020-5865 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200430-0005 |
CVE-2020-5866 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200430-0005 |
CVE-2020-5867 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200430-0005 |
CVE-2020-5895 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200522-0001 |
CVE-2020-5953 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220222-0005 |
CVE-2020-5955 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220223-0003 |
CVE-2020-5956 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220223-0001 |
CVE-2020-6750 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200127-0001 |
CVE-2020-7009 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200403-0004 |
CVE-2020-7014 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200619-0003 |
CVE-2020-7019 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200827-0001 |
CVE-2020-7020 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201123-0001 |
CVE-2020-7021 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210319-0003 |
CVE-2020-7053 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200204-0002 |
CVE-2020-7059 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200221-0002 |
CVE-2020-7060 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200221-0002 |
CVE-2020-7064 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200403-0001 |
CVE-2020-7065 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200403-0001 |
CVE-2020-7066 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200403-0001 |
CVE-2020-7067 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200504-0001 |
CVE-2020-7068 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200918-0005 |
CVE-2020-7069 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201016-0001 |
CVE-2020-7070 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201016-0001 |
CVE-2020-7071 | 2021-02-15 | MEDIUM | 5.3 | In PHP versions 7.3.x below 7.3.26, 7.4.x below 7.4.14 and 8.0.0, when validating URL with functions like filter_var($url, FILTER_VALIDATE_URL), PHP will accept NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210312-0005 |
CVE-2020-7238 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220204-0001 |
CVE-2020-7450 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200210-0003 |
CVE-2020-7451 | 2020-04-28 | MEDIUM | 5.3 | In FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE before r358739, 12.1-RELEASE before 12.1-RELEASE-p3, 11.3-STABLE before r358740, and 11.3-RELEASE before 11.3-RELEASE-p7, a TCP SYN-ACK o NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200413-0001 |
CVE-2020-7452 | 2020-04-29 | CRITICAL | 9.1 | In FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE before r357490, 12.1-RELEASE before 12.1-RELEASE-p3, 11.3-STABLE before r357489, and 11.3-RELEASE before 11.3-RELEASE-p7, incorrect use o NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200413-0001 |
CVE-2020-7453 | 2020-04-29 | MEDIUM | 6.0 | In FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE before r359021, 12.1-RELEASE before 12.1-RELEASE-p3, 11.3-STABLE before r359020, and 11.3-RELEASE before 11.3-RELEASE-p7, a missing null NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200413-0001 |
CVE-2020-7454 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200518-0005 |
CVE-2020-7455 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200518-0005 |
CVE-2020-7456 | 2020-06-09 | MEDIUM | 6.8 | In FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE before r361918, 12.1-RELEASE before p6, 11.4-STABLE before r361919, 11.3-RELEASE before p10, and 11.4-RC2 before p1, an invalid memory lo NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200625-0005 |
CVE-2020-7457 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200724-0002 |
CVE-2020-7458 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200724-0002 |
CVE-2020-7459 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200821-0005 |
CVE-2020-7460 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200821-0005 |
CVE-2020-7461 | 2021-03-26 | HIGH | 7.3 | In FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE before r365010, 11.4-STABLE before r365011, 12.1-RELEASE before p9, 11.4-RELEASE before p3, and 11.3-RELEASE before p13, dhclient(8) fail NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201016-0002 |
CVE-2020-7462 | 2021-03-26 | MEDIUM | 5.5 | In 11.4-PRERELEASE before r360733 and 11.3-RELEASE before p13, improper mbuf handling in the kernel causes a use-after-free bug by sending IPv6 Hop-by-Hop optio NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201016-0002 |
CVE-2020-7463 | 2021-03-26 | MEDIUM | 5.5 | In FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE before r364644, 11.4-STABLE before r364651, 12.1-RELEASE before p9, 11.4-RELEASE before p3, and 11.3-RELEASE before p13, improper handlin NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201016-0002 |
CVE-2020-7464 | 2021-03-26 | MEDIUM | 5.3 | In FreeBSD 12.2-STABLE before r365730, 11.4-STABLE before r365738, 12.1-RELEASE before p10, 11.4-RELEASE before p4, and 11.3-RELEASE before p14, a programming e NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201016-0002 |
CVE-2020-7467 | 2021-03-26 | HIGH | 7.6 | In FreeBSD 12.2-STABLE before r365767, 11.4-STABLE before r365769, 12.1-RELEASE before p10, 11.4-RELEASE before p4 and 11.3-RELEASE before p14 a number of AMD v NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201016-0002 |
CVE-2020-7468 | 2021-03-26 | HIGH | 8.8 | In FreeBSD 12.2-STABLE before r365772, 11.4-STABLE before r365773, 12.1-RELEASE before p10, 11.4-RELEASE before p4 and 11.3-RELEASE before p14 a ftpd(8) bug in NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201016-0002 |
CVE-2020-7469 | 2021-06-04 | HIGH | 7.5 | In FreeBSD 12.2-STABLE before r367402, 11.4-STABLE before r368202, 12.2-RELEASE before p1, 12.1-RELEASE before p11 and 11.4-RELEASE before p5 the handler for a NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210720-0001 |
CVE-2020-7471 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200221-0006 |
CVE-2020-7595 | 2020-01-21 | HIGH | 7.5 | xmlStringLenDecodeEntities in parser.c in libxml2 2.9.10 has an infinite loop in a certain end-of-file situation. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200702-0005 |
CVE-2020-7656 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200528-0001 |
CVE-2020-7699 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200821-0003 |
CVE-2020-7919 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200327-0001 |
CVE-2020-8165 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20250509-0002 |
CVE-2020-8169 | 2020-12-14 | HIGH | 7.5 | curl 7.62.0 through 7.70.0 is vulnerable to an information disclosure vulnerability that can lead to a partial password being leaked over the network and to the NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200911-0002 |
CVE-2020-8172 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200625-0002 |
CVE-2020-8174 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201023-0003 |
CVE-2020-8177 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200911-0001 |
CVE-2020-8201 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201009-0004 |
CVE-2020-8203 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200724-0006 |
CVE-2020-8231 | 2020-12-14 | HIGH | 7.5 | Due to use of a dangling pointer, libcurl 7.29.0 through 7.71.1 can use the wrong connection when sending data. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200911-0003 |
CVE-2020-8251 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201009-0004 |
CVE-2020-8252 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201009-0004 |
CVE-2020-8265 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210212-0003 |
CVE-2020-8284 | 2020-12-14 | LOW | 3.7 | A malicious server can use the FTP PASV response to trick curl 7.73.0 and earlier into connecting back to a given IP address and port, and this way potentially NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210122-0007 |
CVE-2020-8285 | 2020-12-14 | HIGH | 7.5 | curl 7.21.0 to and including 7.73.0 is vulnerable to uncontrolled recursion due to a stack overflow issue in FTP wildcard match parsing. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210122-0007 |
CVE-2020-8286 | 2020-12-14 | HIGH | 7.5 | curl 7.41.0 through 7.73.0 is vulnerable to an improper check for certificate revocation due to insufficient verification of the OCSP response. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210122-0007 |
CVE-2020-8287 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210212-0003 |
CVE-2020-8428 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200313-0003 |
CVE-2020-8441 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200313-0001 |
CVE-2020-8449 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210304-0002 |
CVE-2020-8450 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210304-0002 |
CVE-2020-8492 | 2020-01-30 | MEDIUM | 6.5 | Python 2.7 through 2.7.17, 3.5 through 3.5.9, 3.6 through 3.6.10, 3.7 through 3.7.6, and 3.8 through 3.8.1 allows an HTTP server to conduct Regular Expression D NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200221-0001 |
CVE-2020-8517 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210304-0002 |
CVE-2020-8551 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200413-0003 |
CVE-2020-8552 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200413-0003 |
CVE-2020-8555 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200724-0005 |
CVE-2020-8557 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200821-0002 |
CVE-2020-8558 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200821-0001 |
CVE-2020-8559 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200810-0004 |
CVE-2020-8561 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20211014-0002 |
CVE-2020-8562 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220225-0002 |
CVE-2020-8563 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210122-0006 |
CVE-2020-8564 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210122-0006 |
CVE-2020-8566 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210122-0006 |
CVE-2020-8571 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200313-0005 |
CVE-2020-8572 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200520-0001 |
CVE-2020-8573 | 2020-06-29 | MEDIUM | 6.5 | The NetApp HCI H610C, H615C and H610S Baseboard Management Controllers (BMC) are shipped with a documented default account and password that should be changed d NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200626-0001 |
CVE-2020-8574 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200803-0001 |
CVE-2020-8575 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200803-0002 |
CVE-2020-8576 | 2020-09-02 | MEDIUM | 5.4 | Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.3P19, 9.5P14, 9.6P9 and 9.7 are susceptible to a vulnerability which when successfully exploited could lead to addition NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200902-0001 |
CVE-2020-8577 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201105-0001 |
CVE-2020-8578 | 2021-02-08 | LOW | 3.3 | Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.3P20 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow an attacker to discover node names via AutoSupport bundles ev NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210208-0002 · NTAP-20210208-0003 |
CVE-2020-8579 | 2020-10-27 | HIGH | 7.5 | Clustered Data ONTAP versions 9.7 through 9.7P7 are susceptible to a vulnerability which allows an attacker with access to an intercluster LIF to cause a Denial NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201026-0001 |
CVE-2020-8580 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201105-0002 |
CVE-2020-8581 | 2021-01-19 | MEDIUM | 6.5 | Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.3P20 and 9.5 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow an authenticated but unauthorized attacker to overwri NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210119-0001 |
CVE-2020-8582 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201113-0007 |
CVE-2020-8583 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201113-0008 |
CVE-2020-8584 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210108-0008 |
CVE-2020-8585 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210128-0001 |
CVE-2020-8587 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210208-0001 |
CVE-2020-8588 | 2021-02-03 | LOW | 3.5 | Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.3P20 and 9.5P15 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow unauthorized tenant users to discover the existenc NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210201-0001 |
CVE-2020-8589 | 2021-02-03 | LOW | 3.5 | Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.3P20 and 9.5P15 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow unauthorized tenant users to discover the names of NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210201-0002 |
CVE-2020-8590 | 2021-02-08 | LOW | 3.3 | Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.1P18 and 9.3P12 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow an attacker to discover node names via AutoSupport NVD ↗ · |
CVE-2020-8597 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200313-0004 |
CVE-2020-8608 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201001-0002 |
CVE-2020-8616 | 2020-05-19 | HIGH | 8.6 | A malicious actor who intentionally exploits this lack of effective limitation on the number of fetches performed when processing referrals can, through the use NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200522-0002 |
CVE-2020-8617 | 2020-05-19 | HIGH | 7.5 | Using a specially-crafted message, an attacker may potentially cause a BIND server to reach an inconsistent state if the attacker knows (or successfully guesses NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200522-0002 |
CVE-2020-8618 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200625-0003 |
CVE-2020-8619 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200625-0003 |
CVE-2020-8620 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200827-0003 |
CVE-2020-8621 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200827-0003 |
CVE-2020-8622 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200827-0003 |
CVE-2020-8623 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200827-0003 |
CVE-2020-8624 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200827-0003 |
CVE-2020-8625 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210319-0001 |
CVE-2020-8648 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200924-0004 |
CVE-2020-8670 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210702-0002 |
CVE-2020-8674 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200611-0007 |
CVE-2020-8678 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210212-0006 |
CVE-2020-8696 | 2020-11-12 | MEDIUM | 5.5 | Improper removal of sensitive information before storage or transfer in some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable informati NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201113-0006 |
CVE-2020-8698 | 2020-11-12 | MEDIUM | 5.5 | Improper isolation of shared resources in some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201113-0006 |
CVE-2020-8700 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210702-0002 |
CVE-2020-8703 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210611-0004 |
CVE-2020-8705 | 2020-11-12 | MEDIUM | 6.8 | Insecure default initialization of resource in Intel(R) Boot Guard in Intel(R) CSME versions before 11.8.80, 11.12.80, 11.22.80, 12.0.70, 13.0.40, 13.30.10, 14. NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201113-0004 · NTAP-20201113-0002 +1 |
CVE-2020-8706 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200814-0002 |
CVE-2020-8707 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200814-0002 |
CVE-2020-8708 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200814-0002 |
CVE-2020-8709 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200814-0002 |
CVE-2020-8710 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200814-0002 |
CVE-2020-8711 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200814-0002 |
CVE-2020-8712 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200814-0002 |
CVE-2020-8713 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200814-0002 |
CVE-2020-8714 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200814-0002 |
CVE-2020-8715 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200814-0002 |
CVE-2020-8716 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200814-0002 |
CVE-2020-8717 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200814-0002 |
CVE-2020-8718 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200814-0002 |
CVE-2020-8719 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200814-0002 |
CVE-2020-8720 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200814-0002 |
CVE-2020-8721 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200814-0002 |
CVE-2020-8722 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200814-0002 |
CVE-2020-8723 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200814-0002 |
CVE-2020-8729 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200814-0002 |
CVE-2020-8730 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200814-0002 |
CVE-2020-8731 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200814-0002 |
CVE-2020-8732 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200814-0002 |
CVE-2020-8733 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200814-0003 |
CVE-2020-8734 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200814-0003 |
CVE-2020-8738 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210122-0008 |
CVE-2020-8739 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210122-0008 |
CVE-2020-8740 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210122-0008 |
CVE-2020-8744 | 2020-11-12 | HIGH | 7.8 | Improper initialization in subsystem for Intel(R) CSME versions before12.0.70, 13.0.40, 13.30.10, 14.0.45 and 14.5.25, Intel(R) TXE versions before 4.0.30 Intel NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201113-0004 · NTAP-20201113-0002 +1 |
CVE-2020-8745 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201113-0002 · NTAP-20201113-0005 |
CVE-2020-8746 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201113-0003 |
CVE-2020-8747 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201113-0003 |
CVE-2020-8749 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201113-0003 |
CVE-2020-8750 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201113-0005 |
CVE-2020-8751 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201113-0002 · NTAP-20201113-0005 |
CVE-2020-8752 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201113-0003 |
CVE-2020-8753 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201113-0003 |
CVE-2020-8754 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201113-0003 |
CVE-2020-8755 | 2020-11-12 | MEDIUM | 6.4 | Race condition in subsystem for Intel(R) CSME versions before 12.0.70 and 14.0.45, Intel(R) SPS versions before E5_04.01.04.400 and E3_05.01.04.200 may allow an NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201113-0004 · NTAP-20201113-0002 |
CVE-2020-8756 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201113-0002 |
CVE-2020-8757 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201113-0003 |
CVE-2020-8758 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200911-0005 |
CVE-2020-8760 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201113-0003 |
CVE-2020-8761 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20201113-0002 |
CVE-2020-8764 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210122-0008 |
CVE-2020-8832 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200430-0004 |
CVE-2020-8835 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200430-0004 |
CVE-2020-8840 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200327-0002 |
CVE-2020-8908 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20220210-0003 |
CVE-2020-8992 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200313-0003 |
CVE-2020-9327 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200313-0002 |
CVE-2020-9383 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200313-0003 |
CVE-2020-9391 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200313-0003 |
CVE-2020-9402 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200327-0004 |
CVE-2020-9484 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200528-0005 |
CVE-2020-9488 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200504-0003 |
CVE-2020-9490 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200814-0005 |
CVE-2020-9492 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20210304-0001 |
CVE-2020-9546 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200904-0006 |
CVE-2020-9547 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200904-0006 |
CVE-2020-9548 | — | — | — | NVD ↗ · NTAP-20200904-0006 |
Years: 2026 · 2025 · 2024 · 2023 · 2022 · 2021 · 2020 · 2019 · 2018 · 2017 · 2016 · 2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 1999